Because he knew he could get away with it. Parents let their children sleep with him. Nobody asked questions or batted an eye.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Footage of Michael Jackson ring shopping with a young boy resurfaces
- Thread starter Rilakkuma Fanatic
- Start date
Because he knew he could get away with it. Parents let their children sleep with him. Nobody asked questions or batted an eye.
How about read the OP? The information is in the first post.
....
Have you actually watched the full documentary and Oprah interview?
Enjoy music crafted by the same hands that committed disgusting acts. Fucking gross.
Sure I also eat meat and drive a car that runs on gas, I should just kill myself to avoid supporting anything evil.
And yet you still have people moving goalposts and engaging in ridiculous mental gymnastics (maybe Jimmy bought the rings himself!). The image Jackson created and the power it has over people is incredible. Robson was dead on in the doc when he said Jackson groomed the entire world.
Yeah, it's all a big hazy mess. You're going to have different sides as he was such a big worldwide star, with people giving different info with what is available to them and how they view things.
Michael Jackson threads are going to be a headache for people no matter what you believe unless some decree is given by God himself giving an official ruling. I don't know how any thread on him can come to a safe ending until that, unless somehow discussion on him is banned totally.
User Banned (2 Weeks): Conspiratorial Rhetoric Surrounding Allegations of Abuse
Yes, maybe I phrased it incorrectly. I meant it was possible Safechuck bought the rings he showed off in the documentary sometime when he was an adult and the reason he did so is that he knew as a child he was with Michael when he went ring shopping so it would corroborate what he was saying. Not saying it's likely at all just it's those doubts that make me struggle to believe it as 100% fact. Unless you're going on about something else?
Michael Jackson discussions are a headache because of people like you.
Or they know hes guilty and just don't care because they like his music. Thing is He wasn't even that good. Michael Jackson's success was due to Quincy Jones far more than Michael Jackson. It's not a coincidence that after they stopped working together MJ never made another song worth listening to. Just another mediocre pedophile.
Just fucking floored someone can watch James tell his account in the documentary and interview, and then go on to suggest he could have staged it all and bought the rings that he shows during one of the most harrowing moments of the documentary. In a thread with CCTV footage of Michael buying rings with an unrelated boy.
Just trash, fucking trash.
I haven't said anything against Michael Jackson, nor Wade Robson or James Safechuck.
Do you extend these kind of outlandish, unlikely (even in your own words) hypotheticals to other victims of abuse or does it only apply when its the guy who wrote Thriller so you want so badly for it to not be true? What you wrote is about as likely as the "It's R Kelly's twin brother in the video!" or "it was OJ's son that committed the murders!" yet would you for a second entertain any of that bullshit?
All I'm saying is that AI is a thing now. How do I not know that the video wasn't generated by AI and isn't completely fake? It's concerns like this which makes me not able to 100% commit to the idea that he's a pedophile (and btw any percentage below 100% is functionally the same as 0% but I can't say I don't believe them or I'll get banned tee hee).
You've said plenty. You brushed their accounts aside. Your agenda is incredibly transparent.
Apparently not because youre in here talking about stuff that you're asking others to inform you on.
Isn't there a bit in the South Park episode with him where he wears a cheap fake mustache and it keeps falling off? Wonder if that's a reference that went over my head until now or a huge coincidence.
Well I'm not the one who asked the question, but I personally would ask for proof rather than what is in the OP. However this ring situation isn't new to me and so I don't need to have anything about it confirmed. It's fine to want definitive proof though. People shouldn't be chastised for that.
Obviously not, but when you know 100% fact that this ONE person is behind awful acts, you mean to tell me you can't turn it down? Comparing food and transportation to music as well. Good lord.
Banning all the relentless twats like yourself who persist in just 'saying facts' in efforts to discredit and have-wave child abuse victims would be a good start.
"I'm just asking questions!"
"I need definitive proof!"
"I just can't get behind it!"
Jesus do y'all subscribe to the same newsletter or something?
"I need definitive proof!"
"I just can't get behind it!"
Jesus do y'all subscribe to the same newsletter or something?
'Here's more evicence that gives more plausibility to the victim's claims'
'idk bro what if he's faking it'
'idk bro what if he's faking it'
Last edited:
Really? Show me a single post where I did that. I'll bet you a hundred dollars you can't.
19:30 but at 15:00 its a roll coaster of nonsense from the guy he's interviewing
Buying a Rolex ring to fake it for a documentary he wasn't being paid for.
Talk about a gamble!
Seriously. Oh, but he was just a weird dude, who never had a childhood. And he's dead! Leave him alone! It's all cult-like and it's all really sickening once you get past the facade of the artist and his works. All that art takes on a new light knowing the truth.
What upsets me is that people completely ignore the fact that he deceptively groomed/destroyed families and ruined childhoods/actively sought to destroy the credibility/lives of anyone that would ever believe otherwise. No, he really wasn't this innocent naive Peter Pan figure, he was a ruthless predator. And he fucking bought and spent literal millions of his dollars on acres of secluded land, a gigantic estate, and a literal amusement park/zoo to entice and have sex with adolescent boys while flaunting it in everyone's face.
It's fucking sickening that there's anyone really trying to question it at this point. And though I feel for Robson/Safechuck, I feel most of all for Arvizo who's name got dragged through the mud but we now know was probably telling the truth and never got proper justice for what was done to him.
It's fucking wild that security turned out to be right to think of him as a suspicious person but then laughed it off just because he was Micheal Jackson.
Because Jackson groomed the world into thinking he was just some weird but harmless manchild.
Between this and the sleeping in beds with little boys behind locked doors and the child pornography found at his home and the multiple detailed allegations, I'm inclined to believe this is all a giant conspiracy against Michael Jackson. What other conclusion is there?
They do. There's a couple pro Jackson websites out there that all tell people to spout the same bullshit talking points.
Yeah I have been losing faith in MJ the last couple of weeks and this settles it.
Michael Jackson can get fucked.
Michael Jackson can get fucked.
