I love this trope and the hilarious scenarios it leads to, where awful murderers can just chill out with the good guys like nothing happened. The sunny naivety of it all is appealing somehow. Maybe just for the contrast to more grounded stories.
Please remember that Shaw did NOTHING WRONG. A minor traffic incident. As you can clearly see, Shaw barely scraped Han's vehicle, then promptly made a phone call to extend his friendship to Dom in his time of grief.
Well they fought a tank with their cars so...
Kakyoin was mind controlled and Bruno only killed/hurt other gangsters. Funny af, but hardly unforgivable. What people have been talking about here would be the equivalent of forgiving Dio and Kira. In fact, Jojo is probably the most vindictive outlier of shonen that comes to mindDio and Kira get fuuuuucked up super hard lol
It's often purely used as a way to showcase the moral "power" of the main character, completely ignoring how actual rehabilitation or redemption would work, in turn giving a strong immoral or amoral tint to the whole.
Then again, Freezing was pretty meh even for a titty anime. As titty animes go, I'd definitely rank it below stuff like Seikon no Qwaser, Sekirei or even Manyuu Hikenchou.What's worse than the forgiveness is straight up not punishing them.
If you want to rage hard at an anime, look no further than Freezing.
All I have are three words: Louis El Bridget
Heh. I'm trying to imagine an angry scream version of "This is not ok!" and the results are amusing.許す is to allow, permit, say it's okay, etc.
This is not okay, this will not do, I will not stand for this, this cannot be, etc, all could be proper interpretations for 許されない.
I believe it is a concept of Asian tales that no one is truly good or evil just different and that unless the act is completely harmful, you can be forgiven. That said I think there certain media that may misunderstand where the line is to forgive (The Freezing example).
Western media is fairly guilty of this too, Darth Vader being the most famous example. One good act doesn't undo all the genocide he did because he had a spooky dream.
The thing I hate MOST about the fogiveness trope is that you have a show of how many random guards/soldiers/security guards/grunts etc. the main characters are willing to dispose of, but when it comes to the leader? Forgive them or you'll be as bad as them!
My uncle works for Nintendo he can confirm.I think it has something to do with the Japanese concepts of honor and shame, but I'm not quite sure, I'm not an expert
It's definitely something you can say, but it really only makes sense if you're talking to someone who... cares about you I guess? Like in a sense you're withdrawing any chance at reconciling but that wouldn't matter if you were never friends in the first place.uh... didn't knew it was something you don't say in english... i've seen it a lot in french and not from japanese media
I understand the usage of the redemption instead of forgiveness as the intended trope but much like the complaints in this thread, what she does to redeem herself is not even close to sufficient to feel earned.The mom who plotted with the enemies and was responsible for the death of all of her coworkers as well as probably hundreds of thousands at least in cities around the world, if she had a change of heart and was just able to escape on a helicopter with her family it would have been an act of forgiveness that would feel unearned, but since she sacrificed herself to stop what she started, it was an earned act of redemption.