• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.
OP
OP
DigitalOp

DigitalOp

Member
Nov 16, 2017
9,288
American company copies dances from Americans and it's stealing culture from where exactly? How is it not American culture already? I mean, these aren't ancient dances passed on through the ages. Or the pinnacle of the art of dance, to be fair.

Lets try to not pretend that Black Culture is widely considered American culture.....

Yeah by definition it is, but we gonna ignore the vast amount of racist white majority who otherize us to the point of creating a "Black Culture" sub-category?

Its funny how y'all try to include us in the AMERICAN story whenever you want to attack us for taking on our own identity

An Identity we had to create because we weren't included in the first place.....

Looking around a bit it looks like Gangnam Style is called Ride The Pony. So not credited either.

and Fortnite stole that from the Koreans
 

Spruchy

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
134
Credit all the dance, at the very least put the originator in the item description. I don't see why anyone would be against this.
 
Oct 30, 2017
2,206
Like I said in my last post. I see no issue with Epic naming their dances after the artist, seems fair.

Would Epic even be able to put these artists names in without having to create time consuming negotiations and contracts allowing the use of their identity with no compensation?

Seems like Epic should just stop taking people's dance moves and make their own up.
 

HeroR

Banned
Dec 10, 2017
7,450
Thanks, although that wasnt the main thrust.

The point is that the 'Moonwalk' is old and existed long before Jeffrey Daniel. So for MJ to give credit, he would have site blacks from at least the 30s.

So it's better to give credit to the thing that popularize an idea or move if the origins are lost in history like who invent the Backslide.
 

Zukuu

Member
Oct 30, 2017
6,809
That was definitely the case during world of Warcraft times but I imagine nowadays they're mostly mo-caped by professional dancers


No. The tools nowadays - if handled by a professional - are way better to recreate moves. In particular in Fortnight, I think they do frame-by-frame animation. It's way too identical to be just "mo-capped":
 

Olaf

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,419
How would you even know where a dance move originated from? Jumping on one foot and moving your arm?

Let's say Epic pays some black artist $1M for a dance move, how exactly does this change cultural erasure? It's still forever a Fortnite thing.
 

Deleted member 8593

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
27,176
It's especially funny because those corporations are extremely anal when it comes to copyright and trademarks but what are you gonna do.
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,240
1164.jpg
 

Razor Mom

Member
Jan 2, 2018
2,547
United Kingdom
Its basically if you do the dance in public, and someone says "Thats from Fortnite!!!"

its basically this:

ed2.png
You can apply this logic to any thing ever invented. Everything we create is influenced by things before it. Even outright "stealing" someone else's idea but executing it in a way that reaches more people is pretty standard. This isn't erasure any more than a dominos pizza is erasing Raffaele Esposito.
 

Blah

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,602
If they were lifting something else like artwork or music from artists would people then have an issue with it? Is it that y'all just don't take it seriously because it's, predominately, dances from black artists?

I remember when Uncharted 4 had a painting in the background that used a picture from Assassin's Creed and they had to remove and apologize over it after backlash. The painting on the wall was completely irrelevant to the game. These dances aren't and they're essentially framing them as their own.

How is this so difficult to grasp? It's not, y'all just don't care.
 

Moose the Fattest Cat

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Dec 15, 2017
1,439
<dances up to hottie in the club> hey

Bouncer: HOLD UP - do you own the rights to those moves?

<a 90s music video ensues>
 

Raonak

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
2,170
Pointing out that white people can't dance aside, which they can't, it wouldn't hurt Fornite to give some credits. Paying though? Yeah, good luck sorting that out logistically.

I mean, some white people can dance, like how some black people can't dance. I know one of my friends can boogie when he gets wasted enough.

Logistics of payment is gonna be legal hell though. Because, if you are paying for one dance, then it's favoritism.
Ideally, you should be paying the creators of every dance they use.

So business wise, you're left with 4 options:
  • Pay for all dances.
  • Pay for no dances.
  • Remove the dances
Ideally they should just credit the originator of the dance... But that wouldn't really solve OP's issue.
People will still collectively know it as the fortnight dance.
 
OP
OP
DigitalOp

DigitalOp

Member
Nov 16, 2017
9,288
How would you even know where a dance move originated from? Jumping on one foot and moving your arm?

Let's say Epic pays some black artist $1M for a dance move, how exactly does this change cultural erasure? It's still forever a Fortnite thing.

So you're fucking asking me where the Shoot originated, and theres a fucking video in the OP....

Credit fixes erasure more than payment.

It's especially funny because those corporations are extremely anal when it comes to copyright and trademarks but what are you gonna do.

Yeah, corps can fuck you sideways with 2 sentences, but little man can't protect his own shit. Capitalism.


Riveting thought process. I see the light now.
 

HeroR

Banned
Dec 10, 2017
7,450
It's especially funny because those corporations are extremely anal when it comes to copyright and trademarks but what are you gonna do.

Except the dances in this case are not copyrighted or trademark. Something cooperates do through courts like Disney trying to copyright 'Wish Upon a Star' despite them not inventing that phase.
 

Syntsui

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,874
They could give Blocboy 100 million dollars, make his name pop up in giant letters everytime someone uses in game an still no one would associate it with him, it is and will forever be a Fortnite dance as harsh as it may be. Crediting him wouldn't solve the appropriation issue by any means.

The masses will call it the fortnite dance the same way they called video games ''nintendos/playstations'', the same way they call bandages ''baid-aid'' and yogurts ''danones''.
 

Skux

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,942
Like I said in my last post. I see no issue with Epic naming their dances after the artist, seems fair.

Would Epic even be able to put these artists names in without having to create time consuming negotiations and contracts allowing the use of their identity with no compensation?

This actually causes more issues than it solves. Part of the reason the dance moves are renamed is to avoid the possibility of using a trademarked name, leaving them open to litigation.

Not to mention the cultural issue of everyone claiming "I made this dance first".
 

ynthrepic

Member
Oct 25, 2017
633
If they were lifting something else like artwork or music from artists would people then have an issue with it? Is it that y'all just don't take it seriously because it's, predominately, dances from black artists?

I remember when Uncharted 4 had a painting in the background that used a picture from Assassin's Creed and they had to remove and apologize over it after backlash. The painting on the wall was completely irrelevant to the game. These dances aren't and they're essentially selling them as their own.

How is this so difficult to grasp? It's not, y'all just don't care.

They used artwork from another developer likely as a placeholder and removed it because it was an obvious oversight. Im not sure how this relates at all to the current subject?
 

TheBaldwin

Member
Feb 25, 2018
8,285
Would acknowledging the source material (say in item descriptions) mean bigger potential for a lawsuit from the originator of the dance?
 
OP
OP
DigitalOp

DigitalOp

Member
Nov 16, 2017
9,288
If they were lifting something else like artwork or music from artists would people then have an issue with it? Is it that y'all just don't take it seriously because it's, predominately, dances from black artists?

I remember when Uncharted 4 had a painting in the background that used a picture from Assassin's Creed and they had to remove and apologize over it after backlash. The painting on the wall was completely irrelevant to the game. These dances aren't and they're essentially framing them as their own.

How is this so difficult to grasp? It's not, y'all just don't care.

Excellent fucking point.

Y'all shit the bed over concept art.

But this... nah, its totally okay. Fuck the blacks.

An extension of GAMERS for sure.
 

Sim

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,871
It'd be cool if they acknowledged the history behind the dance, even if it's just the name. Maybe it helps some people learn a thing or two about it, maybe people ignore it. Whatever, the attempt would be appreciated. If it's a potential copyright issue, then maybe that's a conversation worth having. I don't know, I would have liked to read a nice, friendly conversation about that. But hey, maybe we can just have a gamer ass argument over this and low key mock the culture too. Sure.
 

Deleted member 4093

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,671
If they were lifting something else like artwork or music from artists would people then have an issue with it? Is it that y'all just don't take it seriously because it's, predominately, dances from black artists?

I remember when Uncharted 4 had a painting in the background that used a picture from Assassin's Creed and they had to remove and apologize over it after backlash. The painting on the wall was completely irrelevant to the game. These dances aren't and they're essentially framing them as their own.

How is this so difficult to grasp? It's not, y'all just don't care.
Wonderful analogy.

I swear to god they do not give a fuck.
 

Razor Mom

Member
Jan 2, 2018
2,547
United Kingdom
So you're fucking asking me where the Shoot originated, and theres a fucking video in the OP....
And you're gonna do this with every dance? Who's to say a dance wasn't actually invented by the person that you think popularised it, but rather that they saw some kid dancing on a street corner and decided to incorporate that. Like for real, what's the plan with deciding who the credit goes to here? You want people to apply for patents?
 

Moose the Fattest Cat

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Dec 15, 2017
1,439
If they were lifting something else like artwork or music from artists would people then have an issue with it? Is it that y'all just don't take it seriously because it's, predominately, dances from black artists?

I remember when Uncharted 4 had a painting in the background that used a picture from Assassin's Creed and they had to remove and apologize over it after backlash. The painting on the wall was completely irrelevant to the game. These dances aren't and they're essentially selling them as their own.

How is this so difficult to grasp? It's not, y'all just don't care.

I'm absolutely sympathetic to the appropriation argument. I think the hurdle here is that copyright law is an absurd concept to begin with, and owning/monetizing movement is a very slippery slope kind of argument.

In this specific case, I think that the classy move for Epic would be to credit the source inspiration in the dance's page on the store. Cite the sources. Offering payment begins to make it legally more strenuous, and arguably what Epic is charging you money for is the movement to your character, not the dance itself.

The aspect of this that is the nuance of copyright law is where people lose interest, because not only is it a tedious topic, but it's one that interferes with the way we interact with the games as consumers, which is as its own complete artistic piece. I suspect that's why the comments haven't been to your liking.
 

RedOnePunch

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,628
The legal and financial aspect of it are way above my head so I'm not going to comment on that but if the developers are clearly inspired by or copying a dance, they should give the artist credit in the game.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
I mean, some white people can dance, like how some black people can't dance. I know one of my friends can boogie when he gets wasted enough.

Logistics of payment is gonna be legal hell though. Because, if you are paying for one dance, then it's favoritism.
Ideally, you should be paying the creators of every dance they use.

So business wise, you're left with 4 options:
  • Pay for all dances.
  • Pay for no dances.
  • Remove the dances

Once white people hit the drugs or booze then they THINK they can dance. That's when smartphones are their worst enemy.

I don't see any problem whatsoever with Epic acknowledging all of these things as well?

I agree but the only issue there might be the irony in actually mentioning an artist or some sort of other videos/media directly. Hence why a lot of the time when things are done across mediums/media they come with generic or ripped off names to not infringe on trademarks/copyright.

Coca-Cola becomes Kokey-Koala, but similar colours might be used.

I mean look at this



There's plenty of things in there taken from other forms of media that mentioning by name might ironically be what infringes on copyright, but the dance itself doesn't.

What's supposed to be culturally relevant is people see something like a well-known dance and they already know what it's from. That's how the diverse and good parts of culture get shared/propagated and spread/remembered.
 

BernardoOne

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,289
If they were lifting something else like artwork or music from artists would people then have an issue with it? Is it that y'all just don't take it seriously because it's, predominately, dances from black artists?

I remember when Uncharted 4 had a painting in the background that used a picture from Assassin's Creed and they had to remove and apologize over it after backlash. The painting on the wall was completely irrelevant to the game. These dances aren't and they're essentially framing them as their own.

How is this so difficult to grasp? It's not, y'all just don't care.
It's not predominately dances from black artists. Have you actually played the game?
 

Deleted member 5167

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,114
Is it that y'all just don't take it seriously because it's, predominately, dances from black artists?

But they're not predominantly from black artists. There are enough "origin of fortnite dances!!" videos on youtube to show that.
A big chunks aren't even from 'artists' period, they're jokes from sitcoms.
 

signal

Member
Oct 28, 2017
40,199
And you're gonna do this with every dance? Who's to say a dance wasn't actually invented by the person that you think popularised it, but rather that they saw some kid dancing on a street corner and decided to incorporate that. Like for real, what's the plan with deciding who the credit goes to here? You want people to apply for patents?
Just credit the inspiration. You don't need to make a universal claim about the verified origin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.