Yep. Waste of time. But Fox paid for the rights so they are trying to salvage some advertiser dollars.
Extra $$ ? I think you are overestimating how much people would care about this.
And forgetting that clubs don't want to release their players in the summer (much less for friendly loser's competition) and that they are heavily compensated by FIFA for the World cup (200 millions for 2018).
Hmm. This gives teams playing in the World Cup a possible alternative if they dont want to play in Russia..
I don't see why everyone is defaulting to "no" on this, it sounds better than a string of random friendlies. If top players decline, fine, there are plenty of players looking for playing time and a chance to show the national team coaches what they can do. That could even be a selling point of the "showcase," don't allow players that start more than 25% of a top division team's games and call it a "rising stars" showcase. And the bribe money to get FIFA's blessing is probably a drop in the bucket compared to what Fox stands to lose in a USA-less WC.
First time Im hearing about this and Im fascinated reading those wikipedia pages. I had no idea this was ever a thing!You can have... competitions outside of FIFA, no problem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIFI_Wild_Cup
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederation_of_Independent_Football_Associations
Just look at that lineup.
I didn't realize the existence of one tournament precluded the existence of another, especially one not restricted in the same way as another one.
I take issue with that statement. The USMNT couldn't even draw against T&T (thats all they needed to clinch at least the playoff).Lmao. Who the fuck wants to see these shitty teams? USA couldn't beat Trinidad and Tobago. Italy couldn't beat Sweden. Chile couldn't beat Bolivia. Lol.
Exactly, seems like here's atleast one sports fan among the nerds and geeks!I don't see why everyone is defaulting to "no" on this, it sounds better than a string of random friendlies. If top players decline, fine, there are plenty of players looking for playing time and a chance to show the national team coaches what they can do. That could even be a selling point of the "showcase," don't allow players that start more than 25% of a top division team's games and call it a "rising stars" showcase. And the bribe money to get FIFA's blessing is probably a drop in the bucket compared to what Fox stands to lose in a USA-less WC.
I don't mind it. These are international games, people root for their country even if it's not the most prestigious tournament there is. And even if the best players aren't there. It's still football. And especially the younger guys benefit a lot for playing games like these. People who truly love hockey watch something like EHT too. Even though it never has the best players, not even close. It's still quality sports to watch. Or like college basketball isn't exactly the same as the NBA. But people still seem to enjoy it.
It's quite shocking to see some of the reactions here. Seems like knee-jerk once again.
Exactly, seems like here's atleast one sports fan among the nerds and geeks!
I don't know much about American leagues. I'm a Finn myself, so my perspective naturally comes from hockey. There have been many different international tournaments as long as I remember watching it from early 90's. Some are worldwide and some are European teams only. There was a small tournament just last week played between Finland, Czech, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland and Canada. Tickets were sold out and here in Finland these games gathered the biggest viewership from TV watchers for the Fin-Can and Fin-Swe matches. We love hockey here. Fox probably isn't intending this to be another World Cup.This is international football, not your feel-good, pay-to-win, at-least-you-tried 'American leagues.
In football there is not next year, no loser pick first. In football you go home, lick your wounds, get ready to not fail in 4 years.
None of this "you too are special" tournament dumbfoolery.