Francis Ford Coppola backs Scorsese in row over Marvel films

Angie

Best Avatar Thread Ever!
Member
Nov 20, 2017
15,893
Kingdom of Corona
Being all like "Marvel movies are all the same lel" is indefensible nonsense. And not even seeing the movies before misrepresenting them is next level shitposting.

This behavior would be embarrassing enough from some nobody DC fanboy, but from a respected creator in the industry? Outrageously tactless.
But here is the thing. Scorsese saw a few, and even says they are well made and all that. he was using the phrase “cinema” in a very esoteric, scholarly and insular sense.
Keep in mind that Scorsese and Coppola are actual film historians and scholars, and not only awarded Directors. So saying their opinion is not worth because they are just "old men", would not makes their views and opinions the embarrassing ones.
 

TDLink

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,383
There’s only one MCU ensemble film truly worth a damn, and that was Infinity War. The two best MCU movies solo are the two that stray most from formula; Thor Ragnarok and Iron Man 3. Everything else is forgettable tripe, yes even Winter Soldier with that horrendous, bed-shitting third act.
Infinity War both succeeds and fails entirely on the back of the 20 movies that came before it. Which is a major problem. They are using built up affection for these characters in lieu of any character development -- which is needed for the climax to hit the way they want it to. The whole thing is effectively the most purified version of slamming action figures together for 2 and a half hours. And it's really fun because of that. But also because of that it is impossible for it to stand on its own as any sort of effective film. I suppose it is extra memorable in a way because of that, but it also is going to prevent it from being easy to revisit or get anything out of for people who weren't there for it at the time.
 

Tabs2002

Member
Feb 1, 2018
1,163
I don't get why this thread is so big. He's entitled to his opinion. Are we going to get a thread everytime someone says anything about the MCU
 
Oct 26, 2017
9,859
I don't get why this thread is so big. He's entitled to his opinion. Are we going to get a thread everytime someone says anything about the MCU
Because people on ERA can't accept opinions, and when something they care about (see MCU) is criticized they need to start insulting and getting mad because someone dared to say that Marvel movies are not good or they are not cinema. The first page is embarassing.
 

SolidChamp

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,867
Infinity War both succeeds and fails entirely on the back of the 20 movies that came before it. Which is a major problem. They are using built up affection for these characters in lieu of any character development -- which is needed for the climax to hit the way they want it to. The whole thing is effectively the most purified version of slamming action figures together for 2 and a half hours. And it's really fun because of that. But also because of that it is impossible for it to stand on its own as any sort of effective film. I suppose it is extra memorable in a way because of that, but it also is going to prevent it from being easy to revisit or get anything out of for people who weren't there for it at the time.
You’ve hit the proverbial nail precisely on the head: In 90% of the cases, these films do not stand on their own two legs. There’s no true “cinematic classic” that can stand the test of time as a real achievement beyond being just another cog in a well-oiled money making mega franchise. Taken as a whole it’s an impressive feat; the most successful movie franchise in history. But like any franchise it offers nothing but empty calories. And that’s totally fine! That’s still an enjoyable, popcorn-munching time at the movies. But no, it’s not “cinema” in the purest sense of the art form, I’m sorry to say.

They’re not saying people can’t enjoy them; they’re simply saying what I’ve known and felt from the start: these films could never touch on the human condition in the ways other genre pictures have. A film like LOGAN has more emotion, subtext, and resonance in its two hour runtime than the whole of the MCU put together.

I just don’t feel shit when I watch an MCU movie other than “Hey, neat.”
 

Trup1aya

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,348
Is there a theme to like Ant-Man 2 or the new Spider-Man? It's not something I really deconstruct to be honest.
Of course- standard fair for both of them. Good vs Evil, Perseverance, Courage/Heroism

For Ant-Man 2 there's Vengeance and Redemption

In Spider-man you've got : Coming of Age, Transformation

Really, mcu films are simple, On-the-nose Thematically. The idea that there are no themes present is really silly. They aren't any more Thematically void than great blockbuster like Jaws or Star Wars.
 

Boiled Goose

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
10,003
I don't get why this thread is so big. He's entitled to his opinion. Are we going to get a thread everytime someone says anything about the MCU
Because people on ERA can't accept opinions, and when something they care about (see MCU) is criticized they need to start insulting and getting mad because someone dared to say that Marvel movies are not good or they are not cinema. The first page is embarassing.
Scorcese admitted he hasn't seen the movies.

This thread would be much shorter if he had seen them and said they aren't good.

The fact that he didn't watch them plus the cinema take is what's absurd

He thinks they don't have narratives
 

Holundrian

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,948
Nah I think this is just old people gatekeeping bullshit.
All of cinema is trash(MCU included) on the basis of being enlightening to be honest never learned anything useful from it, maybe they should try writing books instead if they want to create enlightening content.

All you ever learn from cinema is fake garbage often painting you a toxic worldview from misogyny, to trash depictions of mathemticians, to trash depictions of musicians, to trash depictions of ton of other jobs, so enlightening.... xD

Cinema has never been about depicting what is true, but what is exciting.
 
Last edited:

TDLink

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,383
A lot of fast food is garbage. The marvel films aren't high art but they aren't garbage.
I don't think when people are using that analogy they are talking about quality. They are talking about how it's the same frozen and reheated thing every time, and it makes you feel good/crave it, but is never as tasty or nice as a meal at a good sit down restaurant.
They’re not saying people can’t enjoy them; they’re simply saying what I’ve known and felt from the start: these films could never touch on the human condition in the ways other genre pictures have. A film like LOGAN has more emotion, subtext, and resonance in its two hour runtime than the whole of the MCU put together.

I just don’t feel shit when I watch an MCU movie other than “Hey, neat.”
Yup. Exactly. And it's why so many people like Logan and call it one of the better superhero movies out there -- despite NOT being a 250 mil big spectacle superhero film. Even if they can't vocalize that's why.
 

UltraMagnus

Member
Oct 27, 2017
12,553
Of course- standard fair for both of them. Good vs Evil, Perseverance, Courage/Heroism

For Ant-Man 2 there's Vengeance and Redemption

In Spider-man you've got : Coming of Age, Transformation

Really, mcu films are simple, On-the-nose Thematically. The idea that there are no themes present is really silly.
Good Vs. Evil isn't really a theme though, that's just a standard conflict, if you took a writing class and said that was your theme you'd likely get an F from the teacher. You have to something to say about the idea of good vs. evil.

Like even a "basic" film like Star Wars is deeper themeatically than that. Star Wars among other themes very clearly wants to speak about spiritualism and it's place in a highly technological world, which a very obvious allegory for the world we live in and not just random "sci-fi issues", and it's a theme that Darth Vader even directly says in the first film.

That's more than just "well good versus evilz" as an example.
 
Last edited:

TDLink

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,383
Scorcese admitted he hasnt seen them.
Scorcese admitted he hasn't seen the movies.

This thread would be much shorter if he had seen them and said they aren't good.

The fact that he didn't watch them plus the cinema take is what's absurd

He thinks they don't have narratives
That's simply not true. He has stated he has seen several of them multiple times in the past. We just don't know which ones. But frankly it doesn't matter. We know Coppola has seen more than one also, with Black Panther definitely being one of them.


Of course- standard fair for both of them. Good vs Evil, Perseverance, Courage/Heroism

In Spider-man you've got : Coming of Age, Transformation
These apply to literally every one of the MCU films. Yes, ALL of them. They're also extremely surface level without deep things to say about any of them.


Good Vs. Evil isn't really a theme though, that's just a standard conflict, if you took a writing class and said that was your theme you'd likely get an F from the teacher. You have to something to say about the idea of good vs. evil.

Like even a "basic" film like Star Wars is deeper themeatically than that. Star Wars among other themes very clearly wants to speak about spiritualism and it's place in a highly technological world, which a very obvious allegory for the world we live in and not just random "sci-fi issues", and it's a theme that Darth Vader even directly says in the first film.

That's more than just "well good versus evilz".
This gets it.
 
Last edited:

Slayven

CEO of ZAIA
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
62,745
Like clockwork... Keep on fighting the good fight Sculli.
A
Nah, sorry. These two don't own the word cinema. They're just talking about their opinions. No matter what they are just saying words. And both of them are having trouble getting their own films funded precisely because Marvel is literally gatekeeping the industry (as Sculli so effectively gave an example of). Marvel IS the gate.
Which is more likely reality Marvel books studio time to make movies or they do it just to cock block Coppola or Scorsese? One is reality the other is tinfoil hat land. Hell Scorsese just got 150 million for The Irishman? Damn dude can barely catch a break
 

apocat

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,906
Nah I think this is just old people gatekeeping bullshit.
All of cinema is trash(MCU included) on the basis of being enlightening to be honest never learned anything useful from it, maybe they should try writing books instead if they want to create enlightening content.

All you ever learn from cinema is fake garbage often painting you a toxic worldview from misogyny, to trash depictions of mathemticians, to trash depictions of musicians, to trash depictions of ton of other jobs, so enlightening.... xD

Cinema has never been about depicting what is true, but what is exciting.
You should watch better movies...
 

TDLink

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,383
He said he tried to watch them. He didn't say he finished a single one. Given his takes, I'm highly skeptical.

They're not too different from a decent action flick as to be unwatchable.
Scorsese isn't the kind of guy to walk out of the theater. He has seen a MCU movie. You don't need to move your goal posts, you're just not right about this. He never said they're unwatchable.
 

Scullibundo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,674
Which is more likely reality Marvel books studio time to make movies or they do it just to cock block Coppola or Scorsese? One is reality the other is tinfoil hat land. Hell Scorsese just got 150 million for The Irishman? Damn dude can barely catch a break
I... don’t understand what you’re trying to say in this post. Nobody is saying that Marvel are gatekeeping, just that the notion that Marvel movies are being denied access is beyond ridiculous.
 

Trup1aya

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,348
You can't really "gatekeep" a term though I don't think. They can give an opinion on it but that's about it.
"Gatekeeping" is colloquially used to describe the act of an individual taking it upon themselves to decide who/what has access to a particular communitty/ identity/ classification.


Scorsese fabricating his own definition of cinema so that he can exclude MCU is a classic example of gatekeeping.
 

Boiled Goose

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
10,003
That's simply not true. He has stated he has seen several of them multiple times in the past. We just don't know which ones. But frankly it doesn't matter. We know Coppola has seen more than one also, with Black Panther definitely being one of them.



These apply to literally every one of the MCU films. Yes, ALL of them. They're also extremely surface level without deep things to say about any of them.



This gets it.
Unless there are other quotes. The one below doesn't really suggest he's watched them. It's honestly an absurd take. All marvel movies have some emotional angle and definitely a narrative angle. His characterization of the movies to me implies he thinks they're something that they're not

"I don’t see them. I tried, you know? But that’s not cinema. Honestly, the closest I can think of them, as well made as they are, with actors doing the best they can under the circumstances, is theme parks. It isn’t the cinema of human beings trying to convey emotional, psychological experiences to another human being."
 

Gustaf

Member
Oct 28, 2017
11,520
Good Vs. Evil isn't really a theme though, that's just a standard conflict, if you took a writing class and said that was your theme you'd likely get an F from the teacher. You have to something to say about the idea of good vs. evil.

Like even a "basic" film like Star Wars is deeper themeatically than that. Star Wars among other themes very clearly wants to speak about spiritualism and it's place in a highly technological world, which a very obvious allegory for the world we live in and not just random "sci-fi issues", and it's a theme that Darth Vader even directly says in the first film.

That's more than just "well good versus evilz" as an example.
this is bullshit tho

take captain marvel as an example of how "good vs evil" can be used to different degrees
 

Slayven

CEO of ZAIA
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
62,745
gatekeeping
noun

  1. 1.
    the activity of controlling, and usually limiting, general access to something.

No one is limiting or deleting your Marvel movies, they are just giving their own opinion, if you don't like it, move on.
Both Scorsese and Coppola ain't doing a campaign to control Hollywood and stop Disney from producing movies, i don't think this is hard to understand.
I don't know why you coming at me silly. A man shits on the good work of others and folks happy feelings about said work. People make have something to say about it. If you going to dismiss the conversation cause you don't folks have valid thoughts and opinions it, then that is on you bro.
 

TDLink

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,383
Which is more likely reality Marvel books studio time to make movies or they do it just to cock block Coppola or Scorsese? One is reality the other is tinfoil hat land. Hell Scorsese just got 150 million for The Irishman? Damn dude can barely catch a break
You're thinking on too small a scale. It's not about Marvel personally fucking either of these guys. It's about how they fought for creator-control in Hollywood and now the MCU machine (and others) have transformed it back into a producer/studio-controlled world where it's incredibly difficult to get any big budget picture made that doesn't fit this mold.

And yes, bringing up The Irishman is a good example, but not in the way you think. Scorsese couldn't get a studio to fund his vision, so he had to go outside of the system, to Netflix, in order to get his movie made. That is part of the "inciting incident" to this whole comment as it stemmed from a question he was asked on press tour for The Irishman.
 
Oct 26, 2017
15,320
"Gatekeeping" is colloquially used to describe the act of an individual taking it upon themselves to decide who/what has access to a particular communitty/ identity/ classification.


Scorsese fabricating his own definition of cinema so that he can exclude MCU is a classic example of gatekeeping.
Disney is the biggest blockbuster maker, makes the most money at the theatres, and is supposedly pressuring theatres in various way. To say Scorsese or Copolla are gatekeeping is incredibly hilarious. Yeah, they may gatekeep a word in an elitist way, but how harmful is that?
 

Trup1aya

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,348
Like clockwork... Keep on fighting the good fight Sculli.
A
Nah, sorry. These two don't own the word cinema. They're just talking about their opinions. No matter what they are just saying words. And both of them are having trouble getting their own films funded precisely because Marvel is literally gatekeeping the industry (as Sculli so effectively gave an example of). Marvel IS the gate.
How is the definition of a word an opinion? Cinema has an objective definition.The reason they are "Gatekeeping" is because they are trying to dictate what classifies as cinema.

Disney is the biggest blockbuster maker, makes the most money at the theatres, and is supposedly pressuring theatres in various way. To say Scorsese or Copolla are gatekeeping is incredibly hilarious. Yeah, they may gatekeep a word in an elitist way, but how harmful is that?
Money/ theater terms have nothing to do with whether or not Scorsese or Copolla are gatekeeping nor anything to do with the discussion at hand.

They are disqualifying movies as "cinema" based on a their own, made-up definitions of the word. They are gatekeeping.
 

SageShinigami

Member
Oct 27, 2017
24,080
Not a single one of you care about FFC or Scorsese's opinion. It only matters to you because it either props up your opinion that MCU films "are trash", or makes it look like it invalidates your opinion amongst people who think those movies are bad. " This famous director says they suck, see?"

So what? Did you enjoy them when you saw them? Did the characters reach you? The story resonate with you? Let that be enough.
 

Boiled Goose

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
10,003
I don't think when people are using that analogy they are talking about quality. They are talking about how it's the same frozen and reheated thing every time, and it makes you feel good/crave it, but is never as tasty or nice as a meal at a good sit down restaurant.

Yup. Exactly. And it's why so many people like Logan and call it one of the better superhero movies out there -- despite NOT being a 250 mil big spectacle superhero film. Even if they can't vocalize that's why.
I still think that's a terrible analogy.

First, not all marvel films are of the same quality.
Second, not all films trying to be higher art are good.

If a sit down meal is better, that is about quality. So your post is self refuting
 

Holundrian

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,948
You should watch better movies...
Why when I can read books *shrug*. Cinema still playing catchup to the actual enlightening content of books.
Also dunno aren't good will hunting, whiplash, interstellar all considered good movies? They're all trash on the basis of being enlightening.
Good will hunting shows you math is easy if you're born for it, which is not reality as stated by the actual person proving fermat's last theorem.
Interstellar bends physics where convenient to tell a more entertaining story not sure what's enlightening about that, I guess some people find fake news enlightening too. Whiplash also twists what being a musicians is about for a more exciting narrative angle but that does not enlighten, it entertains.
As much as these old men try to pretend their doing high art teaching you anything in the end it's just bogus because in the end it's just fancy entertaining lies.

Heck games are more enlightening content compared to cinema.
 

Boiled Goose

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
10,003
Scorsese isn't the kind of guy to walk out of the theater. He has seen a MCU movie. You don't need to move your goal posts, you're just not right about this. He never said they're unwatchable.
If you show me a quote where he says so, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. The quotes I found to me imply he hasn't.
 

Slayven

CEO of ZAIA
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
62,745
I... don’t understand what you’re trying to say in this post. Nobody is saying that Marvel are gatekeeping, just that the notion that Marvel movies are being denied access is beyond ridiculous.
You are being pediantic, "gatekeeping" has many meanings one being demeaning something by saying it isn't legitimate. And also
Like clockwork... Keep on fighting the good fight Sculli.
A
Nah, sorry. These two don't own the word cinema. They're just talking about their opinions. No matter what they are just saying words. And both of them are having trouble getting their own films funded precisely because Marvel is literally gatekeeping the industry (as Sculli so effectively gave an example of). Marvel IS the gate.
 

TDLink

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,383
Unless there are other quotes. The one below doesn't really suggest he's watched them. It's honestly an absurd take. All marvel movies have some emotional angle and definitely a narrative angle. His characterization of the movies to me implies he thinks they're something that they're not

"I don’t see them. I tried, you know? But that’s not cinema. Honestly, the closest I can think of them, as well made as they are, with actors doing the best they can under the circumstances, is theme parks. It isn’t the cinema of human beings trying to convey emotional, psychological experiences to another human being."
"I tried" = he saw at least one. I am not going to go digging right now, but I am positive he has mentioned seeing more than one in the past.

You're also putting words in his mouth. He never said they don't have a narrative, or narrative angle, or an emotional angle.
How is the definition of a word an opinion? Cinema has an objective definition.The reason they are "Gatekeeping" is because they are trying to dictate what classifies as cinema.
Their words have 0 effect on anything except people debating nonsense on the Internet. That is why it isn't gatekeeping.
 
Oct 26, 2017
15,320
How is the definition of a word an opinion? Cinema has an objective definition.The reason they are "Gatekeeping" is because they are trying to dictate what classifies as cinema.
How do you gatekeep when you cannot physical stop or pressure anyone from doing so? Do you think studios are going, "Well, time to not try and copy the MCU formula because these 2 directors don't like it?"

These are publicly traded companies.
 
Oct 26, 2017
9,859
I don't know why you coming at me silly. A man shits on the good work of others and folks happy feelings about said work. People make have something to say about it. If you going to dismiss the conversation cause you don't folks have valid thoughts and opinions it, then that is on you bro.
I'm not coming silly on you at all, he gave his opinion on the MCU and that's fine, i mean, if he said the same thing about "Logan", "Joker" or another comic movie that i really like, who cares? He has his own idea of cinema and that's completely fine, his opinion won't stop me from enjoying movies and he is not erasing comic movies from theatres.

If people can't accept different opinions that's on them.
 

Boiled Goose

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
10,003
"I tried" = he saw at least one. I am not going to go digging right now, but I am positive he has mentioned seeing more than one in the past.

You're also putting words in his mouth. He never said they don't have a narrative, or narrative angle, or an emotional angle.

Their words have 0 effect on anything except people debating nonsense on the Internet. That is why it isn't gatekeeping.
LOL so you are arguing a positive without any support. FO.

When I read his quotes about trying, no emotion, and narrative films, to me it suggests he hasn't really watched them.

Like I said, I don't think marvel movies are a far cry from other action movies.....

Now... I can agree with part of his sentiment. That theaters are largely dominated by action spectacles rather than more subtle non action movies. Sure. That sucks. But just like dramas, not all action movies are equally bad or equally good
 

Slayven

CEO of ZAIA
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
62,745
I'm not coming silly on you at all, he gave his opinion on the MCU and that's fine, i mean, if he said the same thing about "Logan", "Joker" or another comic movie that i really like, who cares? He has his own idea of cinema and that's completely fine, his opinion won't stop me from enjoying movies and he is not erasing comic movies from theatres.

If people can't accept different opinions that's on them.
And people are giving their opinions on his opinion, that how things should work
 

Trup1aya

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,348
"I tried" = he saw at least one. I am not going to go digging right now, but I am positive he has mentioned seeing more than one in the past.

You're also putting words in his mouth. He never said they don't have a narrative, or narrative angle, or an emotional angle.

Their words have 0 effect on anything except people debating nonsense on the Internet. That is why it isn't gatekeeping.
There words having little actual effect has NOTHING to do with whether they are gatekeeping are not.

What are you talking about?

They are posturing themselves as gatekeepers of cinema - no movie counts as cinema unless it meets their made-up criteria. That's textbook gatekeeping.
 

Aprikurt

Nintendo Die-rect
Member
Oct 29, 2017
13,776
Yeah well, the IT guy from my work can’t get enough of Marvel. Yeah that’s right, THE it guy from work.
 

Darknight

"I'd buy that for a dollar!"
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,131
People can have bad taste. Like people saying rogue 1 is a good movie.

In scorcese case I don't think he has bad taste. Just think he's misinformed
You pissing on fast food and claiming anyone who likes it has bad taste is just the same shit you’re arguing against. To some people, Marvel movies are the equivalent in quality of fast food. Lots of people love Marvel movies just like lots of people like fast food. It’s amazing you can’t grasp how the analogy can be made when you’re doing it from the other end of it to dispel it.
 
Oct 26, 2017
9,859
And people are giving their opinions on his opinion, that how things should work
Giving your opinion is fine, saying that he is gatekeeping is not true.
And i'm not here debating who is wrong or not.
And if you scroll down in the thread, people are not just giving their opinion .

You wrote this, not me
Same gatekeeping elitism from the hollywood old boys network
Difference is their opinion carries a lot more weight seeing as how they've made some of the greatest modern films period versus ... "random dude on internet".
Also this.