The NYT spot-on in its analysis. Money quote:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/13/arts/television/game-of-thrones-season-8-episode-5-bells.html
From the beginning, Daenerys has been merciless with enemies like the witch Mirri Maz Duur, the Essos slave masters, the Lannister army and the Tarlys. Back in Qarth she promised to "lay waste to armies and burn cities to the ground." (Done and done.) As I wrote
before this season began, messianic streaks as profound as hers can, like Targaryens, go either way.
The problem is we've seen far more evidence that she has deep sympathy for the downtrodden, seemingly born of she herself being treated like chattel in the early phases of this story. It was the main driver of the viewer sympathy that just got upended on Sunday.
"In that swollen moment as the bells rang and everyone watched to see what the Mother of Dragons, Breaker of Chains would do,
I thought she would fly straight for Cersei, her understandable flaming rage at the woman who has legitimately wronged her in multiple ways leading to the sort of tragic unintended consequences that can result from messianic leaders following impulsive instincts.
But what we got was Dany deciding to methodically mass murder the exact same kinds of people she lifted up to forge her savior reputation. (Mother of Dragons, Breaker of Chains, Scorcher of Innocents doesn't have the same ring to it.)"