• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Zen

The Wise Ones
Member
Nov 1, 2017
9,656
She has been teetering between terrible person and benevolent savior the whole show. The bells was her moment to decide who she wanted to be. She decided to be the former, knowing people would never accept her as the latter. It's just that people weren't forced to come face to face with her brutality without room for rationalization before now, so it came as a shock. Before we were always given a more pleasant perspective to view her character through.
 

Lunar Wolf

Banned
Nov 6, 2017
16,237
Los Angeles
Something else that got a chuckle out of me. If Drogon's fire breath had that much concussive force behind it, shouldn't mowing the zombies with dragon fire have caused huge swaths of trenches to form? His fire breath was blowing up brick buildings, so I would imagine that where it hit on the ground would be cratered right? Maybe he has power level slider 🤔

In GRRM's original idea for Daenerys, she had powers like Bran Stark except she had access to pyrokinesis.

Imagine Daenerys running around King's Landing going full Azula:

giphy.gif


tumblr_mokfv85KUl1r8tyjfo1_r1_500.gif
 

Surfinn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,590
USA
Makes sense for his character. Even if he only told Arya, Sansa would probably hear about it eventually and be even more pissed.

Sansa trying to force Jon to be king afterwards by leaking it was mad dumb.
No I mean, do you think the right thing to do would be to keep it to yourself forever (hypothetically if EP5 hadn't happened yet)?
All I know is it was cheap as hell to not show how they reacted.
I really wanted to see this too
To be fair, maybe Ned wanted to tell the secret but he felt honorbound by Lyanna's wishes. He did tell Jon they'd speak of his mother the next time they met.
That's true, but he also promised to protect Jon. Telling Jon the truth puts him in immediate danger and brings undue stress and complications into his life. I think he would have told Jon some smaller details, but nothing about the big truth he swore to protect.
 

Surfinn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,590
USA
To make Tyrion idiotically believe Cersei would make the right, benevolent choice.

Twice.

Hack writing.
Honestly, I don't mind Tryion failing over and over with Dany. Dany was going to do what she wanted regardless; no one was going to succeed in keeping her from doing what she wanted. This was outright stated to the viewer in her conversation with Olenna. However.. there's no excuse for constantly misreading Cersei in that context. Was very out of character.
 

NaDannMaGoGo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,963
In the books:

He can warg any living thing including human beings. He can even warg groups of living things like ravens.

If he dies, he can take over someone's body and live as that animal or person as a second life.

An extended lifespan.

Use the weirwoods to go back in time and see things or see anything anywhere in the present through the trees although the Three Eyed Crow says in time he'll be able to see beyond the trees themselves.

He's potentially able to take free will away. There's a point in the books where he reaches out to Hodor and tells him to be quiet after he's running around screaming. He accidentally wargs into him at that moment but then leaves him just as quickly and Hodor stays quiet unable to talk. So he might have the equivalent of the One Ring.

He'll be a god-like being in the books too though:







The weirwoods are the old gods and Bloodraven and Bran are hooked into them.





If you read GRRM's other stories, humans becoming gods (not in the divine sense) are a subject that's fascinated with along with memory, identity, psychics, moral flexibility and hiveminds.

Aye, thank you!

If he does end up getting all-seeing powers, in particular ones which allow him to see or predict future outcomes to a tee, I'm sure interested if GRRM can write and use him in a fashion I find appealing. Show-Bran is obviously sidelined because D&D have enough troubles writing without including his powers.

That said, I dislike prophecies anyway, in part because it makes the world seem deterministic and easily readable, and ASOIAF is obviously filled to the brim with those.
 

Deleted member 1635

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,800
She has been teetering between terrible person and benevolent savior the whole show. The bells was her moment to decide who she wanted to be. She decided to be the former, knowing people would never accept her as the latter. It's just that people weren't forced to come face to face with her brutality without room for rationalization before now, so it came as a shock. Before we were always given a more pleasant perspective to view her character through.

I really do not buy this perspective at all.

She has never went out of her way to kill innocents. Quite the opposite in fact.

She even delayed her quest to reclaim Westeros out of a desire to save more innocents.

She's just never been portrayed to be the kind of person who would indiscriminately slaughter people for no good reason.
 

BossAttack

Member
Oct 27, 2017
42,927
Can someone remind me about book version Bran's capabilities? Because I quite frankly dislike creatures and people with essentially godlike powers in a setting like that. While I've read the books I've kinda forgotten what exactly happened to Bran so far, though I guess he didn't develop/get powers like show Bran yet or I would have remembered.

What you have to understand is the show has never cared for the supernatural elements or lore in the books like religion. To the North the Old Gods are their religion, represented by their Weirwood trees. What we learn in ADWD is that the Old Gods appear to b Greenseers who "see" through these Weirwood trees. This also explains why the Children of the Forest were so angry with the First Men for chopping down their Weirwood trees, but also makes you understand why the First Men did it in the first place. Their seers can literally spy on people through Weirwood trees.

We are only just beginning to understand Bran's power in the books, but the time manipulation is the most intriguing part. Bloodraven states that Bran can't change the past or speak to people in the past, at best they hear a faint voice in the wind they can't make out. A VERY curious statement since people talk all the time about how the Weirwood trees seem like they are saying something when they are near them. But, in the second book we know that Bran seemed to have a conversation with Jon, but Jon thought it was a dream.


In any case, this leads to theories like that Bran (and all seers) are actually the Gods. The Old Gods, The Lord of Light, the Black Goat of Qohor, the Drowned God, whatever; it's all Bran and other powerful seers. But, people call them different names and attribute different aspects to them. But, who knows how much of that theory is true.

Here's Jon Snow (knowingly warging into Ghost) having a "dream" about Bran:

ACOK said:
A weirwood.

It seemed to sprout from solid rock, its pale roots twisting up from a myriad of fissures and hairline cracks. The tree was slender compared to other weirwoods he had seen, no more than a sapling, yet it was growing as he watched, its limbs thickening as they reached for the sky. Wary, he circled the smooth white trunk until he came to the face. Red eyes looked at him. Fierce eyes they were, yet glad to see him. The weirwood had his brother's face. Had his brother always had three eyes?

Not always, came the silent shout. Not before the crow.

He sniffed at the bark, smelled wolf and tree and boy, but behind that there were other scents, the rich brown smell of warm earth and the hard grey smell of stone and something else, something terrible. Death, he knew. He was smelling death. He cringed back, his hair bristling, and bared his fangs.

Don't be afraid, I like it in the dark. No one can see you, but you can see them. But first you have to open your eyes. See? Like this. And the tree reached down and touched him.

And suddenly he was back in the mountains, his paws sunk deep in a drift of snow as he stood upon the edge of a great precipice. Before him the Skirling Pass opened up into airy emptiness, and a long vee-shaped valley lay spread beneath him like a quilt, awash in all the colors of an autumn afternoon.

What's important here is that this happens BEFORE Bran ever met Bloodraven/3ER. This is when Jon first goes North of the Wall with Qhorin Halfhand.
 

DonaldKimball

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,413
Honestly, I don't mind Tryion failing over and over with Dany. Dany was going to do what she wanted regardless; no one was going to succeed in keeping her from doing what she wanted. This was outright stated to the viewer in her conversation with Olenna. However.. there's no excuse for constantly misreading Cersei in that context. Was very out of character.

But he did succeed, she wanted to attack KL, he convinced her not to. Same with all his other stupid plans.
 

Heshinsi

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,089
The way I see it, the justification works, as long as her actions follow it. And the realest action here would have been for her to try and execute Jon to strengthen her claim.

Woulda been a hell of a storyline. How would Tyrion, Varys, Davos, Grey Worm, etc. react?

With both Tyrion and Dany having just one brain cell working between the two of them, they missed how illogical it is to worry that anyone can actually put Jon on the throne if they tried to. Dany has the Unsullied, Dothraki, and a dragon. But she also has Yara Greyjoy who wouldn't give two shits about Jon's claim. But most importantly as it was established in episode 4, she now once again has the support of Dorne and its untouched armies. The Dornish do not strike me as being interested to crown the son of the woman Ellia Martell was abandoned for by Rheagar. So it's highly unlikely they would support Jon over Dany.

That's enough power to effectively crown anyone ruler of the seven kingdoms. Dany has got to be insane (hilarious in its onset) because no one would do what she did as a calculated move. No one.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
No I mean, do you think the right thing to do would be to keep it to yourself forever (hypothetically if EP5 hadn't happened yet)?

I really wanted to see this too

That's true, but he also promised to protect Jon. Telling Jon the truth puts him in immediate danger and brings undue stress and complications into his life. I think he would have told Jon some smaller details, but nothing about the big truth he swore to protect.
I think ultimately there's no right choice and it's really up to how he feels about it.

He was never considered a stark by blood anyway so in a way it doesn't matter as much if they thought he was cat's child too.
 

Blah

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,602
I really do not buy this perspective at all.

She has never went out of her way to kill innocents. Quite the opposite in fact.

She even delayed her quest to reclaim Westeros out of a desire to save more innocents.

She's just never been portrayed to be the kind of person who would indiscriminately slaughter people for no good reason.

She even locked her dragons in a cave, without advisement, after 1 innocent girl was burned to death.
 

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,595
Are we really debating the strength and physical properties of the fire from the dragon now and how it might impact bricks lol.. let's not overthink this

Also, how do we feel about Jon telling his secret to Arya/Sansa?
Calling a character stupid is imo the worst, laziest piece of criticism because 9 times out of 10 when people say this character is stupid, they're projecting their own hindsight + third-person omniscience onto a character who would naturally have neither. But having said that, Jon is just that stupid. He's honorable to the point of idiocy. He shouldn't have told Sansa, he shouldn't have told Dany in the first place, he shouldn't have told Cersei he pledged himself to Dany, and so on and so on. Jon is just a bad leader.

I think its more an issue of them not accurately showing the size of the armies in previous episodes rather than the actual numbers she has left.

This is a longstanding issue I have with the show, where we're constantly being how told this army has however many tens of thousands of soldiers, or that family has however many more tens of thousands. And naturally it's never going to line up with what we see on screen. But I wish they wouldn't keep framing it in the writing as these insane quantities of people or populations that just can't be represented as such. The only time it ever really worked for me was with there wights being estimated around 100k, and that's probably just because so much of The Long Night obfuscates their numbers with the dark that it's easier to get away with the army of the dead feeling like an endlessly large threat.
 

Lunar Wolf

Banned
Nov 6, 2017
16,237
Los Angeles
Aye, thank you!

If he does end up getting all-seeing powers, in particular ones which allow him to see or predict future outcomes to a tee, I'm sure interested if GRRM can write and use him in a fashion I find appealing. Show-Bran is obviously sidelined because D&D have enough troubles writing without including his powers.

That said, I dislike prophecies anyway, in part because it makes the world seem deterministic and easily readable, and ASOIAF is obviously filled to the brim with those.

If it helps, it's explicitly stated that there are multiple futures but some are more likely than others:

"Or you might have joined your strength to his to bring down the Lannisters," Davos protested. "Why not that? If she saw two futures, well . . . both cannot be true."

King Stannis pointed a finger. "There you err, Onion Knight. Some lights cast more than one shadow. Stand before the nightfire and you'll see for yourself. The flames shift and dance, never still. The shadows grow tall and short, and every man casts a dozen. Some are fainter than others, that's all. Well, men cast their shadows across the future as well. One shadow or many. Melisandre sees them all."

You can change the future like MMD did when she killed baby Rhaego who would've grown up to be Genghis Khan.
 

Gamer @ Heart

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,526
She has been teetering between terrible person and benevolent savior the whole show. The bells was her moment to decide who she wanted to be. She decided to be the former, knowing people would never accept her as the latter. It's just that people weren't forced to come face to face with her brutality without room for rationalization before now, so it came as a shock. Before we were always given a more pleasant perspective to view her character through.

She has multiple times expressed how she didn't want to rule by fear like the mareen slavers, or be the queen of ashes. She has been portrayed as the savior come to westeros since she landed. She has been nothing but the good guy. Then suddenly, her 2 male advisors, one of which previously said fuck those people, he wish he hadn't saved them and would watch them burn, is now pleading for a minimal bloodshed resolution. The same man who knew a secret fucking tunnel into the castle and could have sent a hit squad, but nope, not worth a mention.
Her turning point was jon continuing to be an absolutely fucking stubborn idiot and not kissing her back the night before, when she says, 'It's fear then'.
Rheagars dying, missendai being captured because they 'forgot' the iron fleet, Jon actively going against the wishes of his love/queen to tell his secret, to what end? He said he doesn't want the throne. Varys asinine coup attempt and Tyrion being an absolute dipshit for falling for his sister's lies twice and giving bad advice after bad advice...everything is the result of these character being poorly written. Everything screams being written backward from, Mad queen Dany, and choosing the most obvious idiotic path to get there.
 

The Silver

Member
Oct 28, 2017
10,705
Big dick calculated move by Dany would be to have Grey Worm kill Jon in the middle of the chaos of the battle and blame the Lannisters for it.
 

Meows

Member
Oct 28, 2017
6,399
A mother loses two of her three children, one unnecessarily for a foolish cause, and is surrounded by people who are openly betraying her or do not trust her. Her two right hand men have led her to ruin - one being completely incompetent and the other trying to outright murder her. The man who loved her is dead, her best friend was ruthlessly murdered, and her armies have been nearly exterminated - and no one is grateful for her help after all that she has lost. Even the man she loved will no longer reciprocate his love to her. After all the good she has done throughout the world, saving slaves, riding towns of warlords and slave owners, giving all her power to end the White Walkers and the Night King - she has nothing and no one but her child and the goal she set out for from the beginning: conquest.

Reading it out like this is so compelling and tragic. You can see how someone under these circumstances would snap and finally say "enough." The recipe is there for one of the saddest arcs in television. But the execution just isn't there, we haven't even gotten scenes of her mourning these individual things. We don't see her totally distraught until the very beginning of the last episode. Her trajectory leading to this moment makes sense but it is told to us and not shown. Just one episode could have set the stage for this (ideally two or three). Emilia clearly has the chops for it.

It is very sad to me that they rushed this when it could have been fantastic.
 
Oct 26, 2017
19,722
She has been teetering between terrible person and benevolent savior the whole show. The bells was her moment to decide who she wanted to be. She decided to be the former, knowing people would never accept her as the latter. It's just that people weren't forced to come face to face with her brutality without room for rationalization before now, so it came as a shock. Before we were always given a more pleasant perspective to view her character through.
Agreed.

A mother loses two of her three children, one unnecessarily for a foolish cause, and is surrounded by people who are openly betraying her or do not trust her. Her two right hand men have led her to ruin - one being completely incompetent and the other trying to outright murder her. The man who loved her is dead, her best friend was ruthlessly murdered, and her armies have been nearly exterminated - and no one is grateful for her help after all that she has lost. Even the man she loved will no longer reciprocate his love to her. After all the good she has done throughout the world, saving slaves, riding towns of warlords and slave owners, giving all her power to end the White Walkers and the Night King - she has nothing and no one but her child and the goal she set out for from the beginning: conquest.

Reading it out like this is so compelling and tragic. You can see how someone under these circumstances would snap and finally say "enough." The recipe is there for one of the saddest arcs in television. But the execution just isn't there, we haven't even gotten scenes of her mourning these individual things. We don't see her totally distraught until the very beginning of the last episode. Her trajectory leading to this moment makes sense but it is told to us and not shown. Just one episode could have set the stage for this (ideally two or three). Emilia clearly has the chops for it.

It is very sad to me that they rushed this when it could have been fantastic.
I'm getting deja vu.
 

Surfinn

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,590
USA
Calling a character stupid is imo the worst, laziest piece of criticism because 9 times out of 10 when people say this character is stupid, they're projecting their own hindsight + third-person omniscience onto a character who would naturally have neither. But having said that, Jon is just that stupid. He's honorable to the point of idiocy. He shouldn't have told Sansa, he shouldn't have told Dany in the first place, he shouldn't have told Cersei he pledged himself to Dany, and so on and so on. Jon is just a bad leader.
What's interesting to me is Jon's speech to Cersei in the S7 finale. "I feel we need to be honest with each other if we're going to fight together", for Jon, also applies to the truth about himself, and even his immediate family. He's always thought that honesty outweighs all else. It's endearing to me in a way but completely foolish in another. Anybody with any sense could tell you what would happen once he told his sisters. He did the wrong thing for the right reasons, which is basically Jon in a nutshell.
 
Oct 27, 2017
3,897
Portland, OR
That Tyrion video reminded me; has he done anything useful or intelligent since becoming Dany's Hand?
It's so bizarre, because in Season 2, Tyrion was basically the perfect Hand for Joffrey. He exposed the treachery of Janos Slynt and dismissed him to the Wall, he exposed the treachery of Pycelle and dismissed him from the small council, he promoted Bronn, he discovered the wildfire plot and repurposed it for the battle of Blackwater (which could have easily been lost without that gambit), and successfully holds off the attack long enough for Tywin to show up with the cavalry (and promptly take over as Hand of the king), all while stopping most of Joffrey's worst impulses. And he slapped the shit out of Joffrey for being a fucking idiot. Season 2 is the whole reason people fell in love with Tyrion in the first place; it showed him as being actually competent at managing things. So to see him make every possible wrong decision after joining Daenerys makes no damn sense at all. But I guess it goes in line with Daenerys "I want to help people, I don't want to be queen of the ashes, SYYYYYKE, fuck that place."
 

Eugene's Axe

Member
Jan 17, 2019
3,611
Interested to hear how my mom handles Melisandre birthing that shadow demon. She's been liking the show so far (season 2 beginning), even said that the violence is rather well done and not too gratuitous which surprised me. Of course she hasn't seen the worst yet. She called out the sexposition scene with Littlefinger and I absolutely agree, one of the dumbest moments in the show for me too. But my mom had rather hilarious commentary during it. But as the silly nonsense like shadow babies, white walkers and dragons are getting biggert part, I wonder if she'll just drop the show.
giphy.gif
Just wait for that scene I think it was in season 5 where there's a close up of some random dude's balls for no goddamn reason.
 

Majik13

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,844
Was there any point to Cersei's pregnancy? Because it sure doesn't seem like there was any point to it.

didn't it sort of keep Euron around. And was a bargaining chip Tyrion used to think he could persuade Cersei to surrender. As well as maybe one of the reasons Jamie returned to KL. Was also used to make Tyrion think Cersei would help against the NK.
 

tareqsalah

Banned
Nov 6, 2017
243
Serious question, why are people wanting danny to be the queen? And saying she is the heir to the throne? She is a targaryan, i dont care if she is nice, they usurped the throne, they burnt people and conquered westeros. They are invaders. As far as i'm concerned she has no right to step foot in there.

Go rule esos if you want. Im glad she turned bad and i hope she gets killed.
 

Heshinsi

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,089
Big dick calculated move by Dany would be to have Grey Worm kill Jon in the middle of the chaos of the battle and blame the Lannisters for it.

Calculated, thinking long term, boss level strategy move, was to let the zombies kill Jon after the NK resurrected them. The end of the episode would still play out the same, and no more messy heir nonsense. Hell, Jorah might still be alive too. I would have done it 🤷‍♂️
 

Solo

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
15,730
Serious question, why are people wanting danny to be the queen? And saying she is the heir to the throne? She is a targaryan, i dont care if she is nice, they usurped the throne, they burnt people and conquered westeros. They are invaders. As far as i'm concerned she has no right to step foot in there.

Go rule esos if you want. Im glad she turned bad and i hope she gets killed.

Arent most rulers throughout history usurpers? Doesnt mean you arent the legit ruler if you pull off a coup.
 

Zen

The Wise Ones
Member
Nov 1, 2017
9,656
She has multiple times expressed how she didn't want to rule by fear like the mareen slavers, or be the queen of ashes. She has been portrayed as the savior come to westeros since she landed. She has been nothing but the good guy. Then suddenly, her 2 male advisors, one of which previously said fuck those people, he wish he hadn't saved them and would watch them burn, is now pleading for a minimal bloodshed resolution. The same man who knew a secret fucking tunnel into the castle and could have sent a hit squad, but nope, not worth a mention.
Her turning point was jon continuing to be an absolutely fucking stubborn idiot and not kissing her back the night before, when she says, 'It's fear then'.
Rheagars dying, missendai being captured because they 'forgot' the iron fleet, Jon actively going against the wishes of his love/queen to tell his secret, to what end? He said he doesn't want the throne. Varys asinine coup attempt and Tyrion being an absolute dipshit for falling for his sister's lies twice and giving bad advice after bad advice...everything is the result of these character being poorly written. Everything screams being written backward from, Mad queen Dany, and choosing the most obvious idiotic path to get there.
Yeah the writing leaves a lot to be desired on how she got to this point, in part because her acts of brutality before have always had an out or caveat we can use to justify it. She is a hero in Essos but once she sailed for Westeros she couldn't really be called well-meaning anymore. She says she wants to break the wheel and free the people, but IMO that wasn't something we were supposed to take at face value.
 

Heckler456

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,256
Belgium
Serious question, why are people wanting danny to be the queen? And saying she is the heir to the throne? She is a targaryan, i dont care if she is nice, they usurped the throne, they burnt people and conquered westeros. They are invaders. As far as i'm concerned she has no right to step foot in there.

Go rule esos if you want. Im glad she turned bad and i hope she gets killed.
Go back far enough, and everyone's an invader.

They were rightful rulers for like 300 years, all told, I think. That carries a lot of weight, in terms of legitimacy. Invaders or not.
 
Oct 25, 2017
7,510

Punished Goku

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,950
courtesy-of-hbo.jpg


New promo image.

Holy fuck! King's Landing is actually completely gone. It's literally just ruins now.

It didn't seem like that much damage was done last episode but I guess the fire spread tremendously.

Daenerys gonna rule from Dragonstone then or as Queen of the Ashes?
Who are the people behind the unsullied? The Northmen?
Don't talk about the protagonist like that. For shame.
People better put some respeck on his name.
I find it funny that after almost 10 years, there still haven't been a ruler who I rooted for as much as in this moment:

THE KING IN THE NAWTH!
If it helps, it's explicitly stated that there are multiple futures but some are more likely than others:



You can change the future like MMD did when she killed baby Rhaego who would've grown up to be Genghis Khan.
Whose MMD?
 

Heshinsi

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,089
Goddamnit Varys, without fAegon in the show he's turned full idiot.

You think I'm talking about just him bringing Dorne and the Reach on board right? Wrong lol. Go back further. No assassination attempt on her, high chance Visarys is still crying in a hut somewhere wondering when Drogo will keep his end of the promise.

Who are the people behind the unsullied? The Northmen?

Even better...they are the Dothraki. Turns out we didn't see them all die. They just dropped their flaming weapons and booked it to the hills.
 

NaDannMaGoGo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,963
What you have to understand is the show has never cared for the supernatural elements or lore in the books like religion. To the North the Old Gods are their religion, represented by their Weirwood trees. What we learn in ADWD is that the Old Gods appear to b Greenseers who "see" through these Weirwood trees. This also explains why the Children of the Forest were so angry with the First Men for chopping down their Weirwood trees, but also makes you understand why the First Men did it in the first place. Their seers can literally spy on people through Weirwood trees.

We are only just beginning to understand Bran's power in the books, but the time manipulation is the most intriguing part. Bloodraven states that Bran can't change the past or speak to people in the past, at best they hear a faint voice in the wind they can't make out. A VERY curious statement since people talk all the time about how the Weirwood trees seem like they are saying something when they are near them. But, in the second book we know that Bran seemed to have a conversation with Jon, but Jon thought it was a dream.


In any case, this leads to theories like that Bran (and all seers) are actually the Gods. The Old Gods, The Lord of Light, the Black Goat of Qohor, the Drowned God, whatever; it's all Bran and other powerful seers. But, people call them different names and attribute different aspects to them. But, who knows how much of that theory is true.

Here's Jon Snow (knowingly warging into Ghost) having a "dream" about Bran:



What's important here is that this happens BEFORE Bran ever met Bloodraven/3ER. This is when Jon first goes North of the Wall with Qhorin Halfhand.

The Warging and spying via Weirwood trees is fine, even interesting to me. It's when there's stuff like possibly impacting the past and predicting the future (even if not completely clear) that it really loses me. For once, there are always the time paradoxes with that which I do mind and then it's also just such an absurdly powerful ability. Characters like Varys and their scheming suddenly seem much less meaningful when some godly entity can see and potentially even impact all this from vast distances.

That said, it's not impossible to explore all of that and have it be interesting. If e.g. Bran's powers escalate as much in the books, maybe GRRM's gonna manage to deliver on that front. But then, maybe that's just another facet that makes it so difficult to finish writing these books >.<