the day i pay for online console subscriptions is the day hell will freeze over tbh
Unlike PS Plus and Live Gold, Nintendo has somewhat reasonably priced the shorter subscription options. They'll just have to make one month cost $6, 3 months for $10 and the annual stay at $20. Then everyone is going to have to go for the annual one to not get ripped off. It's how Plus and Gold already work.
This is how people sign up for these console "services": They buy a game. Then they press the "multiplayer" button on the game's menu. Then the console says "stop right there, you need (Switch Online / PS Plus / Live Gold) to do that". Then they either pay the price or don't play.Maybe they should opt to improve their infrastructure and service instead.
This is how people sign up for these console "services": They buy a game. Then they press the "multiplayer" button on the game's menu. Then the console says "stop right there, you need (Switch Online / PS Plus / Live Gold) to do that". Then they either pay the price or don't play.
The point of this article is that people are signing up at the 1 and 3 month tiers at a high rate. The monthly version of Switch online is 4 dollars per month. That's a super low price, and if someone wants to play online and gets stopped by the "sign up for online" nag screen, that's an option that they are likely to pick. This is not even bad for Nintendo because they'll make more money out of 48 bucks (12 x 4) than 20 bucks.
"Infrastructure and Service" never comes into play.
Unlike PS Plus and Live Gold, Nintendo has somewhat reasonably priced the shorter subscription options. They'll just have to make one month cost $6, 3 months for $10 and the annual stay at $20. Then everyone is going to have to go for the annual one to not get ripped off. It's how Plus and Gold already work.
Smash servers are not the same thing as Switch Online. You are not paying to play Smash online (even if that is your reason for paying), you are paying to allow Switch games to connect online.Yes their online is garbage. Did you see what happened during the latest smash tournament?
Like if it's that bad how the hell are you making people pay for it?
Sony at least started it out as a game service, that to play online was free for most of not all last gen.
Then as it got better and they invested had people pay for it with keeping with games coming every month, on top of discounts.
Nintendo has a long way to go for online being competent and stable.
Every time a Switch Online topic brought up, I always scratch my head.
Instead of demanding for better online experience, why do people ask for more classic games? It's called Switch Online, not Nintendo Classic subscription service.
Heard nothing great with regards to Smash Bros. working online, which sucks because I barely have anyone to play with it locally, but absolutely would have plenty to play with online. Also their chat system is crap...so I'm hardly surprised.
It's weird how a console that marketed itself constantly playing and socializing with other people, couldn't translate that into an online service that is particularly social.
Sony does not require a subscription for F2P either, it seems to be what Nintendo copied.The ONLY thing I like about the service is that they seem to not be gouging you when it comes to allowing F2P to not require a subscription like Sony/MS
The ONLY thing I like about the service is that they seem to not be gouging you when it comes to allowing F2P to not require a subscription like Sony/MS
Every time a Switch Online topic brought up, I always scratch my head.
Instead of demanding for better online experience, why do people ask for more classic games? It's called Switch Online, not Nintendo Classic subscription service.
People acting like SNES titles are sufficient...jesus. Nintendo really conditions people to accept the worst.
Every time a Switch Online topic brought up, I always scratch my head.
Instead of demanding for better online experience, why do people ask for more classic games? It's called Switch Online, not Nintendo Classic subscription service.
Yeah this is definitely where I land on this too. Make your service better and people will buy into it for longer.
Every time a Switch Online topic brought up, I always scratch my head.
Instead of demanding for better online experience, why do people ask for more classic games? It's called Switch Online, not Nintendo Classic subscription service.
Currently on a family plan with 7(?) other of my friends. They use it only for smash ultimate. I came to less than $5 a person per year.
That's where I'm at. Never payed to play online, never bought a game with an online pass code.the day i pay for online console subscriptions is the day hell will freeze over tbh
I don't know why people always mention this. You're directly connecting to another device when playing a P2P online game. If you have a great connection and theirs sucks, it doesn't matter if you're on LAN or have the fastest internet and a "better" online service wouldn't change anythingI regret purchasing a year. I won't renew it. NES online is trash to, I have two switches on LAN and it would DC....
Yeah, this is meI honestly wish I went with the 3-month plan because I regret getting the 1 year deal. It's not a good service atm