"Gaming Culture" is toxic - Gamers AREN'T Good

Rickenslacker

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,711
I really tend to dislike the greater gaming community and prefer not to engage with it. Although I think a lot of it is also that it tends to skew younger, or at least with regards to general discourse or random interactions. I generally look at a gaming Reddit thread or join a game and immediately assume that a majority of the people that I'm immediately hearing are teenagers, and it's generally not off the mark.
 

Falconbox

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,600
Buffalo, NY
Large parts of practically every fanbase are shitty. Human beings are shitty. I don't think it's really a "gamer" problem so much as it is a human problem.

Yes, it sucks. No, it's not going away any time soon. Yes, the internet has made it worse by amplifying the voices a thousand-fold.

"Some people are pretty bad" has been a problem throughout the whole existence of humans. No matter what group.
 

4859

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,817
In the weak and the wounded
Never heard of this twitter campaign before, immediately distrust it. I love video games but I haven't felt comfortable calling myself a "gamer" in a long time. Not to mention recent events that have made it clear that there are a lot of awful elements in gaming communities, and gaming communities are often uninterested in removing them.



This is neither here nor there, but I'd like to point out that this guy's history on this forum started off by him playing innocent while trying to spread the Gamergate narrative.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/a-message-to-resetera-from-denis-dyack.3867/page-4#post-501581
https://www.resetera.com/threads/a-message-to-resetera-from-denis-dyack.3867/page-5#post-502092

And this kind of thing just makes it harder for everyone. You have people with particular political interests who have seen an opportunity in the gaming community and injected themselves therein. 8chan and /pol/ still exist even if we try to keep them out. The people who log into this forum aren't springing into existence from nowhere; there's nothing preventing these from coming in. I'd like not to be paranoid, but I'm also forced to accept that there are genuinely malicious actors around.

They might be able to keep their words and phrases in line for a while, love the fucking tone policing game, and they might be able to act like they arent really GG they're just asking questions. Some can run on for a long time.

But patterns never lie. They all have the same behavior patterns.
 

DragonKeeper

Member
Nov 14, 2017
1,248
But is it an inherent problem with gaming? Or an issue about anonymity on the internet? You make a premise without attempting to support it. That's where a lot of the knee jerking reaction comes from, its a disagreement of the premise of the idea that this issue's cause is rooted in gaming and gaming culture, that there is some kind of inherent aspect of it that feeds bad behavior online.

Anonymity has proven to not entirely matter. Many of the most influential actors wear their assholery loud, proud and attached their real names. Gaming culture has plenty of history to support these claims, there's nothing knee jerk about it. Everything from the past old school "boys club" mentality adopted in game development (and the tech industry at large) to advertising, and to the games themselves. Then you have a particularly strong habit among gamers associating their identity with what products they purchase - consumer culture. You have competitiveness taken to toxic levels - no cultural promotion of sportsmanship behavior. All of these feed into aggressive in group behavior that, due to the typically white, male, and nerdish cultivation of the community makes its especially hostile to, well, everybody else. The list goes on.

No, none of this is unique to the gaming community, but the gaming community's component ingredients and its high engagement with all of the tools of social media make it a particularly vile brew.

Also, you decry people saying "not all" while at the same time basically saying "almost all" with no sense of self awareness. Can we just agree that the only phrase more useless than "not all" is saying "almost all"?
You conjured this one up all on your own.
 

L Thammy

Spacenoid - One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
30,130
Koreans started sending death threats to a Canadian woman because she won a medal over a Korean skater who was DQed, so... human beings are just trash in general. Games is an excuse.
Honesty, I feel like "this is a human problem" is an excuse. We can deal with symptoms. We don't have to throw up our hands and say that nothing can be done just because the source isn't in our area.

I totally agree that human nature is the root cause here. But part of the reason that societies have laws is because we recognize that, and for that reason, put measures to solve it. That doesn't solve human nature, but that isn't what it's seeking to do. Gaming communities aren't going to solve the problem of human nature, but the communities can set standards for themselves regarding what is and isn't acceptable, and so improve what is within their own reach. That's one of the reasons I'm at ResetEra now instead of 4chan.
 

tryagainlater

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,618
We're a forum dedicated to discussing video games and the industry and every time someone brings this up, people are so quick to say "this is a problem everywhere".

Yes, ok, that's true but we're discussing it in video game culture. As people close to the culture we are the ones who can enact change. So constantly trying to change the subject to "it's a problem everywhere" is a shitty attempt at sweeping it under the rug.

We've seen clearly that a particular form of hatred is prominent among video game culture and boiling it down to "humans be shitty" isn't addressing anything.
 
Nov 4, 2017
2,203
You can ask yourself why so many people who play games do not identify as Gamers and then you’ll find the answer to why precisely Gamers aren’t good.

It’s an identity predicated on consumption and it is invented by the gaming industry to sell more products to a homegrown demographic.
So don't self identify as that. Problem solved.

But if instead, you're more interested in putting down people you don't even know, don't be shocked when they feel defensive.
 

joe_zazen

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,490
Exactly. It's just a perfect storm imo.

That's why I think there /is/ a link between toxic gaming communities and far right extremism. It's all connected somehow, and it might be a nature thing running under all that's related to the medium.
Interesting.

Everything we do on a consistent basis creates neural connections that, ipso facto, change the way we think. A steady diet of heavy gaming vs a steady diet of meditation will have real, physical differences in terms if brain restructuring.

I’d be wary of overlaying a right/left paradigm onto it, though. Any ideologiy can be used as a rationalizarion for the expression of dastardly impulses.
 

Ferrs

Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
15,158
I think we shouldn't talk about abusive practices from gaming devs, after all it happens everywhere, not just gaming. It's human nature!
 

firehawk12

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,037
Honesty, I feel like "this is a human problem" is an excuse. We can deal with symptoms. We don't have to throw up our hands and say that nothing can be done just because the source isn't in our area.

I totally agree that human nature is the root cause here. But part of the reason that societies have laws is because we recognize that, and for that reason, put measures to solve it. That doesn't solve human nature, but that isn't what it's seeking to do. Gaming communities aren't going to solve the problem of human nature, but the communities can set standards for themselves regarding what is and isn't acceptable, and so improve what is within their own reach. That's one of the reasons I'm at ResetEra now instead of 4chan.
You can definitely set standards, but you can't always police them, particularly when a lot of communities are built on some profit motive - see Youtube and all the bullshit that goes on there.
 

L Thammy

Spacenoid - One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
30,130
I think we shouldn't talk about abusive practices from gaming devs, after all it happens everywhere, not just gaming. It's human nature!
Man, I know you're joking, but someone seriously suggests that every damn time.

You can definitely set standards, but you can't always police them, particularly when a lot of communities are built on some profit motive - see Youtube and all the bullshit that goes on there.
I'm pretty sure YouTube can police them, it's more a matter of that they don't care. Which is something to criticize.
 

MattWilsonCSS

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,349
I mean, if we're gonna get into deeper discussion here, there are definitely ways in which gaming is consumed differently than other media that can enable this toxic behavior, that I don't think you can say "gaming has nothing to do with toxicity." You have direct control over characters, you have voice chat and talk directly to other people. When I'm watching TV I'm not watching it over a voice chat with 20 random strangers shouting slurs. In the 90s you had all these disparate gaming communities that really had no vetting. The Internet was basically the Wild West, which had some pretty bad consequences to go along with the good. A lot of the people who are really shitty now on social media and Internet may not necessarily be from gaming, so I understand the "people are trash in general" sentiment, but before social media, this shit was still an issue in gaming. And primarily gaming. I've been on the internet for nearly 25 years (which is insane to type) so I've seen a lot. And gaming has had a problem for a long, long, long time.

Just off the top of my head, AOL's primary gaming community was called ANTagonist, where the whole point was to engage in flame wars. And the console wars of the late 90s was... it was really bad and helped foster a lot of this gross immature behavior. But even before then, you could point to Usenet and some of the unfortunate people that were conjured there.
 

firehawk12

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,037
I think we shouldn't talk about abusive practices from gaming devs, after all it happens everywhere, not just gaming. It's human nature!
I mean, we inherently accept that game developers treat their employees like shit - even if it's not harassment, then it's working conditions.
But is anyone going to boycott Red Dead Redemption 2? Probably not.
 

pirata

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,937
More talk. What's the solution? Talking about it? That's all that every gets done.

I'd love to wipe out hate in every culture. What can I do today, right now, that will help?
Yes! Talking about it is part of the solution. Listening to marginalized voices, empathizing with them, and speaking out for them as allies in any way you can, wherever you can, is how social change begins. Do you think gay rights would have ever gone as far as they have if people didn't start listening to gay people and learning about their experiences, and then calling out their friends and family for their bigotry and lack of empathy? Of course not! The version of me ten years ago would have never believed you if you told him that he would someday have the right to be married, even in the state of Texas. Change is possible, and the biggest obstacle isn't hate, but the apathy that many on this thread seem to be clinging to because it's comfortable and they don't have to do shit but ignore us.

Literally any form of communication on the internet that is unmoderated and anonymous is a shit show. That’s not exclusive to gaming.
Yes, everything's gotten pretty fucked up these days (or was always fucked up), but that's no excuse to do nothing! Apathy solves absolutely nothing! Change starts where you are right now: your family, your friend group, and yes, even your interactions on the internet. Start by shedding your apathy and giving a damn about us! Who cares if it's impossible to fix everything? You have the ability to do the right thing, regardless of whether the good guys win!
 
Last edited:

HP_Wuvcraft

Member
Oct 26, 2017
4,240
South of San Francisco
Absolutely agree. Gamers are nasty, vindictive creatures at times.

Some ache for games to fail.

Some want developers to lose their livelihoods because they don't agree with their views.

Some are just absolute cunts who are unhappy in life and want to bring others down to their level.

...and yep, some are racist, misogynistic pieces of human filth.

Gamers make me ashamed that I like playing games.
Not to mention, this thread is a perfect example of people being offended that others don't share the same ideas of identity that they do. Being called a gamer is nothing to be ashamed of, but ignoring the negative aspects of X hobby just to continue to keep carrying an identification card that is meaningless beyond the initial concept is the definition of being a toxic gamer.

Side note: tons of gamers will say they are anti-gamergate, but once a game comes out that they want to play, and the creator is a gator, it will become "separate art from the artist". This is something that needs to be addressed.
 

DragonKeeper

Member
Nov 14, 2017
1,248
The "humans are trash, it's not just gaming" sentiment is nothing more than support for the status quo via apathy. Humanity as a whole has changed for the better throughout history and often those large positive changes started as movements within small communities. It is, at least theoretically, a lot easier to make things better when you focus on the community you are active in instead of trying to fix the world. It's a much more manageable concept. But if all you're doing is framing the problem as too big and all encompassing to even try to tackle, well, reread my first sentence.
 

Just_a_Mouse

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,030
These past few years have taught me that gamers overall are just fueled by hatred. Any attempts at diversity or inclusion are met with a tidal wave of toxicity. Makes me ashamed to share the same hobby.
 

Shroki

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,287
Anonymity has proven to not entirely matter. Many of the most influential actors wear their assholery loud, proud and attached their real names. Gaming culture has plenty of history to support these claims, there's nothing knee jerk about it. Everything from the past old school "boys club" mentality adopted in game development (and the tech industry at large) to advertising, and to the games themselves. Then you have a particularly strong habit among gamers associating their identity with what products they purchase - consumer culture. You have competitiveness taken to toxic levels - no cultural promotion of sportsmanship behavior. All of these feed into aggressive in group behavior that, due to the typically white, male, and nerdish cultivation of the community makes its especially hostile to, well, everybody else. The list goes on.
Certainly the anonymity of social media and gaming accounts has created an environment where trolls are much more comfortable harassing other people. The stereotypical twitter troll was, before Twitter changed their default avatar, an "egg" who had no identifying features on their account. It's why xxxxSSJ3GOHANxxxx is definitely more likely to throw out some bullshit in a games voice chat than some guy with his real name in his tag. We see these patterns online all the time.

I don't think a handful of well-off public figures acting like jackasses is necessarily applicable to Joe Dirt who works at Pizza Hut and may lose his job if his hate speech goes viral. Every week we have some news piece where a guy is fired from his job for going on a rant on his facebook wall. The lack of real consequences for anonymous trolls is at least part of what enables the daily harassment we see now, because what consequences can you face? Even if they are just having to face judgment from your family and friends?
 

RetroRadTV

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,954
You don’t think those publishers hosting servers have ban records? I suspect a ‘small handful’ is a touch optimistic.
So share those records.

When you put numbers and data to people at large it’s more tangible .

Thing is you’ll never eradicate this problem unless there is a massive push by publishers developers and the big 3 to go hard and perma ban from games or brick consoles.
 

Ahasverus

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,599
Colombia
Interesting.

Everything we do on a consistent basis creates neural connections that, ipso facto, change the way we think. A steady diet of heavy gaming vs a steady diet of meditation will have real, physical differences in terms if brain restructuring.

I’d be wary of overlaying a right/left paradigm onto it, though. Any ideologiy can be used as a rationalizarion for the expression of dastardly impulses.
Exactly. I think it's the "elements" what are laid out, their arrangement is of course dictated by the context. It'd be super interesting if anyone could identify those common elements and their common triggers that derive into one conduct or another.

Here's the part when I see myself as the cat in the meme looking at the newspaper thinking"I should enroll in a phD" haha
 

Zipzo

Banned
Nov 30, 2017
410
I don’t like topics like this because it seeks to simply justify its existence through exclaiming something, without actually presenting any solutions to said thing.

It’s the equivelant of a person in a group who constantly talks about what’s wrong with what the group is doing but never has any better ideas.

FURTHERMORE, you’re susbtituting a solution with “acknowledgement”, as if that absolves you and shows you’ve done your part.

What are the real world solutions you are pursuing other than advising people to not be garbage humans?
 

DerpHause

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,239
Not to mention, this thread is a perfect example of people being offended that others don't share the same ideas of identity that they do. Being called a gamer is nothing to be ashamed of, but ignoring the negative aspects of X hobby just to continue to keep carrying an identification card that is meaningless beyond the initial concept is the definition of being a toxic gamer.

Side note: tons of gamers will say they are anti-gamergate, but once a game comes out that they want to play, and the creator is a gator, it will become "separate art from the artist". This is something that needs to be addressed.
Does it?

Or rather let me ask: What portion of those who purchase or play games do you think are involved in this conversation, who fundamentally know or care who they're buying games from, or who even consider that they should even want to know who they are buying games from?

A number of people separate media from the creators of that media or more specifically don't actually care about those individuals and their personal dealings. That's not what they came for, and often it's not what's on the product they are buying. They may not look of the politics of the developers or what causes they support. Many just don't know.

But this conversation skirts the idea of that being worthy of condemnation. Not sure I can follow that reasoning.
 

Casual

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,547
Okay, so you're discussing games. Somebody says something like "fucking women are ruining gaming with their SJW bullshit."

Is that a problem? I think we'd both say yes - being an asshole is bad! So, at this moment, as you're deciding what (if anything) to do about it - what impact does, say, soccer hooliganism have on your decision making? Does it matter that there's assholes in other communities?
Sure, it's a problem.

I'll start off by saying that I probably wouldn't spend my time doing anything about that. If it happened over voice chat I might throw back a sarcastic response about the persons intelligence depending on how much I feel like engaging at that point in time. That said, I think that's a different conversation....ie. how we deal with these individual occurrences vs. solving the problem at large.

Regarding your question, if someone were trying to solve the problem at large (ie. people being assholes), then yes I think it does matter. If you're trying to solve the problem it's important to recognize the cause, and "gamers aren't good" vs. "some people aren't good" is a very important distinction that changes how you look at the problem and the potential causes. If you told someone that this type of harassment exists because "gamers aren't good", the implication would be that there's a reason gamers specifically are not good, naturally they would look at something within the realm of games that would cause this.
 

Lime

Banned for use of an alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,266
So don't self identify as that. Problem solved.

But if instead, you're more interested in putting down people you don't even know, don't be shocked when they feel defensive.
Sure, but when gamers weaponize their consumer identities to harass developers, women, people of color, and defend multibillion companies & their exploitation of workers, I have to be honest with how terrible they are.

It’s an identity built around consumption and it’s used time and time again to border patrol and justify harassment and toxicity.
 

L Thammy

Spacenoid - One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
30,130
I don’t like topics like this because it seeks to simply justify its existence through exclaiming something, without actually presenting any solutions to said thing.

It’s the equivelant of a person in a group who constantly talks about what’s wrong with what the group is doing but never has any better ideas.

FURTHERMORE, you’re susbtituting a solution with “acknowledgement”, as if that absolves you and shows you’ve done your part.

What are the real world solutions you are pursuing other than advising people to not be garbage humans?
Acknowledgement is a form of solution. If one person engages in abusive behaviour and no one says anything, the statement is made that the behaviour is acceptable. If one person engages in abusive behaviour and they've criticized, it's sending a different message. Part of how people feel comfortable being assholes online gaming and the like is because they've come to view their behaviour as the normal rather than the abnormal, and they assume that people will just shut up and take it.

What I don't get is why people think that an absolute, total solution needs to be developed anyone does anything at all. Like, I don't care if the common cold is incurable, I'm still going to keep a couple bottles of Nyquil around.
 

Crossing Eden

Member
Oct 26, 2017
33,091
I don’t like topics like this because it seeks to simply justify its existence through exclaiming something, without actually presenting any solutions to said thing.

It’s the equivelant of a person in a group who constantly talks about what’s wrong with what the group is doing but never has any better ideas.

FURTHERMORE, you’re susbtituting a solution with “acknowledgement”, as if that absolves you and shows you’ve done your part.

What are the real world solutions you are pursuing other than advising people to not be garbage humans?
The OP does offer a solution. Acknowledgement of the problem is the most important part, as you can see from this thread there's a prominent sentiment in the gaming community to NOT acknowledge that there's a problem or worse, harass those that do.
 

BossLackey

Member
Oct 29, 2017
2,247
Kansas City, MO
I don’t like topics like this because it seeks to simply justify its existence through exclaiming something, without actually presenting any solutions to said thing.

It’s the equivelant of a person in a group who constantly talks about what’s wrong with what the group is doing but never has any better ideas.

FURTHERMORE, you’re susbtituting a solution with “acknowledgement”, as if that absolves you and shows you’ve done your part.

What are the real world solutions you are pursuing other than advising people to not be garbage humans?
This. This. This.
 

Asbsand

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
9,901
Denmark
I concede there is a problem in discourse in general on social media and thus also online gaming, any form that has anonymous chatting essentially, i do however not, as of right now, understand the cause and effect that makes this, a "cancer" that must initiatively be stopped. I so not believe there is an inevitable road to ruination of online discourse from Gamers just because there has historically been a somewhat oversaturation of vitreol and badmouthing, bigotry and all other bad things.
 

-PXG-

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,186
NJ
Saying the world in general is full of jerks isn't dismissing the issue. I'm just stating the truth.

A fan driven hobby that allows people to communicate on a global scale, with little to no consequence or accountability is inevitably going to have problems. What do you honestly expect?

I'm not saying its fine or saying it's okay at all. I'm just surprised that people are surprised. The solution is to lead by example. Simply be better people towards one another in all avenues of life.
 
Last edited:

Cyclonesweep

Member
Oct 29, 2017
6,810
Saying the world in general is full of jerks isn't dismissing the issue. I'm just stating the truth.

A fan driven hobby that allows people to communicate on a global scale, with little to no consequence or accountability is inevitably going to have problems. What do you honestly expect?

I'm not just fine or saying it's okay at all. I'm just surprised that people are surprised.
Shitty people are often the loudest. Social media and online communications allow loud people to be loud. It's simple as that.
 

justiceiro

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
6,664
I'm sorry bro, but i just believe that this is a personal fitgh that everyone has to deal with individually. I rather help people deal with in their own than try to gather a group to fitgh all together.
 

DerpHause

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,239
Acknowledgement is a form of solution. If one person engages in abusive behaviour and no one says anything, the statement is made that the behaviour is acceptable. If one person engages in abusive behaviour and they've criticized, it's sending a different message. Part of how people feel comfortable being assholes online gaming and the like is because they've come to view their behaviour as the normal rather than the abnormal, and they assume that people will just shut up and take it.

What I don't get is why people think that an absolute, total solution needs to be developed anyone does anything at all. Like, I don't care if the common cold is incurable, I'm still going to keep a couple bottles of Nyquil around.
The only issue is that to the harassed this conversation is wholly ineffectual when it only occurs here in the spaces controlled by like-minded individuals who are against harassment. In this space it seems all well and good to have this discussion but it doesn't translate to a solution to the broader issue because this is occurring in a closed space that they can label as irrelevant at best, worthy of enmity at worst.

Galvanizing people through declarations of toxicity applying to the labels they wear, which shouldn't have those explicit meanings, doesn't seem to be working positively. Pointing that out shouldn't be a problem.
 

Cream

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,316
Here’s the thing.

Every ACTUALLY oppressed, disregarded, maligned group or community with both external and internal issues examines itself. Black people, Muslim people, the LGBT, women. Actual victimized groups that didn’t choose to align themselves in those communities. They have no choice.

While many gamers CHOOSE to take pride in being a gamer, and many gamers CHOOSE to see themselves as oppressed and downtrodden and being kept down by so many forces. And many gamers CHOOSE to ignore the problems in their own community.

So I’m gonna keep saying gamers are toxic.

If there was a huge group of hateful, extremist harassing black people called BLACKGATE, every single black person would have NO CHOICE but to answer for it.

You gamers want to be an oppressed minority so bad? This is how it works.
 

Wiggles

Member
Oct 28, 2017
492
User warned: use of slurs, inappropriate assumptions about autism
This discussion annoys me because people are too idiotic to actually understand how the problem manifests to begin with. You start off in school - many "gamers" are men who are socially rejected, neckbeards, or incels. People with zero chance in life to form an actual friendship and an even slimmer chance to land themselves a girlfriend. Many are autistic (by diagnosis), weak, or ugly. They escape into games, porn and anime and that becomes their outlet for relationships with the opposite sex. Of course bullying of these people is very common.

Telling these people they are awful people isn't the right answer because you are trampling on an already marginalized group. I've read articles that have even gone along the lines of "the bullies in high school were right, nerds are assholes and deserved it!". This is retarded logic that only compounds the problem more. This isn't an excuse for their bad behavior, it's an explanation for it, and particularly the pushback you see from "gamer" culture when they feel their hobby is being intruded upon.

Here's a radical fucking notion - how about we start cultivating inclusiveness from an early age and build young men up so that they don't get into this state to begin with? Stamp out nerds getting bullied and stop justifying it because you think they are evil. Engage with these people in school and college to allow them to hone their social skills. Abandon the idea of "toxic masculinity" and get these people more active to eliminate obesity and weakness. If you encouraged these people to ditch Waifu Sim 3: Uguu~ Edition and got them to pick up a set of weights 3x a week, it would do more to tackle the problem than bitching about hashtags on Twitter.
 

HP_Wuvcraft

Member
Oct 26, 2017
4,240
South of San Francisco
Or rather let me ask: What portion of those who purchase or play games do you think are involved in this conversation, who fundamentally know or care who they're buying games from, or who even consider that they should even want to know who they are buying games from?
If someone says "separate art from artist" after being told who they are supporting, then I think they know who they are buying their game from. And they are fine with it.

It's hypocritical.
 

-PXG-

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,186
NJ
Shitty people are often the loudest. Social media and online communications allow loud people to be loud. It's simple as that.
But those people are "loud" because others allow it. They won't have an audience if you don't bother to listen to them in the first place.

Tuning out negativity and not giving it attention is one way to get rid of it. The old saying, "don't feed the trolls" comes to mind. People get a kick out of getting others to react. Don't give them what they want, which is to see you sweat.

You can't ignore everything, but sometimes it works.
 

HStallion

Member
Oct 25, 2017
44,786
I really get tired of people just saying,"Its a human problem/Every hobby has this issue". Thanks for that trite and obvious comment that adds nothing to the conversation except to try and shrug off the topic at hand. Seriously this is like saying diseases have killed people since humanity crawled out of the muck and that we shouldn't even talk about current day illnesses and sicknesses because its always been this way. Thanks for that insightful comment.
 

Zipzo

Banned
Nov 30, 2017
410
Acknowledgement is a form of solution. If one person engages in abusive behaviour and no one says anything, the statement is made that the behaviour is acceptable. If one person engages in abusive behaviour and they've criticized, it's sending a different message. Part of how people feel comfortable being assholes online gaming and the like is because they've come to view their behaviour as the normal rather than the abnormal, and they assume that people will just shut up and take it.

What I don't get is why people think that an absolute, total solution needs to be developed anyone does anything at all. Like, I don't care if the common cold is incurable, I'm still going to keep a couple bottles of Nyquil around.
I don’t disagree that acknowledgement is important...but we’ve seen this thread before.

It’s fair to say this audience in particular has probably acknowledged, or at the least informed on this issue several times....so given that, what’s next? What can we do?

There’s only so much acknowledgement you can do. At some point it becomes redundant. You’re just telling people to acknowledge something they’ve already acknowledged, and that’s irritating.
 

Cyclonesweep

Member
Oct 29, 2017
6,810
But those people are "loud" because others allow it. They won't have an audience if you don't bother to listen to them in the first place.

Tuning out negativity and not giving it attention is one way to get rid of it. The old saying, "don't feed the trolls" comes to mind. People get a kick out of getting others to react. Don't give them what they want, which is to see you sweat.

You can't ignore everything, but sometimes it works.
I agree with that 100%
 

brainchild

VFX Artist/Consultant
Verified
Nov 25, 2017
8,752
Minnesota
OP, please do not co-opt the BLM movement for the purposes of justifying your sweeping generalizations about gamers.

As an African American who has to live in constant fear of the police, I find your parallels ignorant and distasteful. The reason why #AllLivesMatter, #BlueLivesMatter, and #NotAllCops are problematic is because their very similar naming conventions attempt to detract from a very specific concern as it pertains black lives, since it's not all lives that are systematically oppressed and killed by cops.

However, the problem with gaming culture is not specific to gamers. It is a problem with internet culture in general (which is a result of human behavior in general when placed in that kind of environment). Furthermore, it is perfectly reasonable for gamers to directly respond to recent social movements specifically aimed at criticizing gamers. These particular movements aren't even specific to the victims of the toxicity in gaming, but rather the opposite, the alleged culprits. In that case, it isn't a matter of detracting from the concerns of the victims like it is when people counter #BlackLivesMatter, it's actually responding to the criticism.

So essentially, what is the response to the criticism? It appears to be that gamers have had enough stigma to deal with ever since the conception of video games, and they are pushing back. Video games (and subsequently the people who play them) are becoming more and more mainstream, so much so that the demographics for gamers are too broad to draw conclusions about behavior specific to gamers. It just doesn't make sense, as gamers are diverse in both their personalities and behaviors, and there isn't even an exclusive type of gaming culture anymore.

I said all that to say this. It's fine if you have a problem with gamers pushing back on this issue, but do not equate what they're doing to people pushing back against the BLM movement because it's not the same thing and it devalues the merit of BLM activists when you say that it is.
 
Last edited:

DerpHause

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,239
If someone says "separate art from artist" after being told who they are supporting, then I think they know who they are buying their game from. And they are fine with it.

It's hypocritical.
I'd be willing to bet most people who are making these purchases aren't even considering there is something to separate. But sure, if you ate aware there is an issue of ethical consistency.
 

Cream

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,316
OP, please do not co-opt the BLM movement for the purposes of justifying your sweeping generalizations about gamers.

As an African American who has to live in constant fear of the police, I find your parallels ignorant and distasteful. The reason why #AllLivesMatter, #BlueLivesMatter, and #NotAllCops are problematic is because their very similar naming conventions attempt to detract from a very specific concern as it pertains black lives, since it's not all lives that are systematically oppressed and killed by cops.

However, the problem with gaming culture is not specific to gamers. It is a problem with internet culture in general (which is a result of human behavior in general when placed in that kind of environment). Furthermore, it is perfectly reasonable for gamers to directly respond to recent social movements specifically aimed at criticizing gamers. These particular movements aren't even specific to the victims of the toxicity in gaming, but rather the opposite, the alleged culprits. In that case, it isn't a matter of detracting from the concerns of the victims like it is when people counter #BlackLivesMatter, it's actually responding to the criticism.

So essentially, what is the response to the criticism? It appears to be that gamers have had enough stigma to deal with every since the conception of video games, and they are pushing back. Video games (and subsequently the people who play them) are becoming more and more mainstream, so much so that the demographics for gamers are too broad to draw conclusions about behavior specific to gamers. It just doesn't make sense, as gamers are diverse in both their personalities and behaviors, and there isn't even an exclusive type of gaming culture anymore.

I said all that to say this. It's fine if you have a problem with gamers pushing back on this issue, but do not equate what they're doing to people pushing back against the BLM movement because it's not the same thing and it devalues the merit of BLM activists when you say that it is.
OP I’m black and completely disagree with this post.

Seems we’ve reached an impasse
 

Axass

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
1,295
Gaming has a toxicity problem. Absolutely. 100%.

Saying "gaming culture is toxic" is a huge misinterpretation of what's going on.

Of course "gaming culture is toxic" is felt as a personal insult by those that are not toxic in any shape or form, because it's a big bad blanket statement. I think we should fight the rotten part of gaming without calling out the good part, especially considering that the toxic part of the community is pretty vocal, but not as big as you'd think, and not the majority for sure. Even if there were, let's say a few thousands, no, a few hundred thousands, no, even a bunch of millions shitheads harassing developers, women and minorities, embarassing themselves on twitter and sending death threats... that's a drop in the ocean compared to the tens, if not hundreds of millions of well behaved people buying and enjoying games.

Toxicity isn't inherent in gaming culture, it's inherent in human nature: we have to fight and condemn the morons, not crucifying ourselves and be done with it.
 

Cream

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,316
I've explained why I believe the situations are too dissimilar to be conflated. Can you explain why you believe the situations are nearly exactly the same?
I didn’t say they were exactly the same. I just disagree with you that the rhetoric and dismissal isn’t coming from the same place, the same thinking. Yes obviously it doesn’t have all the history and social context behind it, but what are we even talking about here? Mostly straight, cis, white, male gamers that refuse to turn toward their own community and examine the dangerous and growing issues with it, related to sexism, racism, transphobia, etc and hiding behind bullshit platitudes to paint themselves as a good guy, and feel completely guilt free for being too lazy or apathetic to do anything.

Sound familiar?