What a stupid “I have a black friend” questionOr you know he just doesn't like the music. News flash not every thing has to be liked
Anyways, why would a bigot cast a movie with PoC and transgender people?
You are way too oblivious
What a stupid “I have a black friend” questionOr you know he just doesn't like the music. News flash not every thing has to be liked
Anyways, why would a bigot cast a movie with PoC and transgender people?
Having lived in France and Germany I'll say this. It's progress seeing an older European man call rap music anything other than "Black Music"What a stupid “I have a black friend” question
You are way too oblivious
so you're at least now conceding that his comment was obviously racially coded?Having lived in France and Germany I'll say this. It's progress seeing an older European man call rap music anything other than "Black Music"
Yeah. I stopped giving a fuck after the R&B music bs. 4chan users get famous too, mews at 11.BP is just another summer blockbuster. It would make sense that a director like Noe would find a movie like that boring.
No, what I am saying is that different cultures refer to things by different labels. Nothing he said is coded language. He just referred to an American genre by another name because he obviously doesn't give a shit about it.so you're at least now conceding that his comment was obviously racially coded?
lol wowNo, what I am saying is that different cultures refer to things by different labels. Nothing he said is coded language. He just referred to an American genre by another name because he obviously doesn't give a shit about it.
Please tell me what the fuck you are talking about. There is no R&B music in the first 20 minutes of Black Panther nor is there any rap music or Hip-Hop. There is only the official soundtrack scored by Ludwig Goransoon that features sounds from various parts of Africa as well as drawing sounds from other cultures around the world. So, pray tell, how does one confuse African tribal sounds with R&B music or Hip-Hop or Rap? How is that an "American genre?" What part of the below is R&B?No, what I am saying is that different cultures refer to things by different labels. Nothing he said is coded language. He just referred to an American genre by another name because he obviously doesn't give a shit about it.
What? Too Short is being played when the movie cuts to the Oakland scene.Please tell me what the fuck you are talking about. There is no R&B music in the first 20 minutes of Black Panther nor is there any rap music or Hip-Hop. There is only the official soundtrack scored by Ludwig Goransoon that features sounds from various parts of Africa as well as drawing sounds from other cultures around the world. So, pray tell, how does one confuse African tribal sounds with R&B music or Hip-Hop or Rap? How is that an "American genre?"
and that made him "escape the theater"?What? Too Short is being played when the movie cuts to the Oakland scene.
Does he ever consider himself Argentinean? Dude left when he was like 10 when his dad moved him to France because of all the shit that was going down.
That's really stretching. The song is playing on the radio on the street where the kids are playing basketball, it's not in the forefront of the scene. It fades further into the background as the movie transitions to the interior of the apartment and stops immediately when T'Chaka knocks on the apartment door. So, it plays for maybe a whole minute, if that. And, thaat's at the very start of the movie. Try again.What? Too Short is being played when the movie cuts to the Oakland scene.
So what you're saying is that it's there but you're not going to count it because it doesn't fit your argument?That's really stretching. The song is playing on the radio on the street where the kids are playing basketball, it's not in the forefront of the scene. It fades further into the background as the movie transitions to the interior of the apartment and stops immediately when T'Chaka knocks on the apartment door. So, it plays for maybe a whole minute, if that. And, thaat's at the very start of the movie. Try again.
Here's his quote:So what you're saying is that it's there but you're not going to count it because it doesn't fit your argument?
And to think I only thought you did this shit in Star Wars threads.
So, what you are saying is that he had such an INTENSE reaction to less than 1 minute of Hip-Hop music barely audible in the background at the opening start of the film within the city of Oakland. Is that what you're saying? Please clarify.Gaspar said:I hated the R&B music [in “Black Panther”]. The music was so bad that I had to escape.
I always suspected it
I mean I'm a giant film snob. I've walked out of movies for less.Here's his quote:
So, what you are saying is that he had such an INTENSE reaction to less than 1 minute of Hip-Hop music barely audible in the background at the opening start of the film within the city of Oakland. Is that what you're saying? Please clarify.
Right...in other words, dodge the question.I mean I'm a giant film snob. I've walked out of movies for less.
You're the guy saying there wasn't anything other than the score in the first 20 mins then when it's pointed out that isn't true you moved your goal post to another field.
True, accurate and sad at the same time.
Having lived in France and Germany I'll say this. It's progress seeing an older European man call rap music anything other than "Black Music"
I don't buy the cultural differences argument considering France is 2nd to America for the hip hop culture since the 80s. Especially where Gaspar Noe resides, Paris, and he has used the same actor from La Haine (1995), Vincent Cassel, which is the film that put him on the map and which he surely must have watched before he hired him for Irreversible (2002).Cultural differences and a lack of interest in hip-hop could also account for him throwing RnB out there. People always used to tell me they hated "techno" when they were listening to just about anything with an electronic beat. People are frequently clueless about stuff that an initial distaste keeps them at a distance from. The wording definitely carries unfortunate connotations about race, though, whether or not they reflect a harbouring of conscious or subconscious bigotry. I wouldn't put it past a figure like Noe to have discomfiting views.
I mean they’re free to regard his opinion as shit as he is just as free to give a shit opinion. No need to defend his thinly veiled points.Lol at all the Marvel kids who only watch superhero movies and shit on Noé just because he criticized one superhero movie.
The guy directed I stand Alone, which is an incredible movie.
His penis comment is also spot on.
This board would shit on Fellini or Antonioni or Kurosawa or Kubrick too if they dare to criticize a superhero movie.
If they spoke out their asses the way Noé did, absolutely. And I worship Kurosawa.Lol at all the Marvel kids who only watch superhero movies and shit on Noé just because he criticized one superhero movie.
The guy directed I stand Alone, which is an incredible movie.
His penis comment is also spot on.
This board would shit on Fellini or Antonioni or Kurosawa or Kubrick too if they dare to criticize a superhero movie.
Opps/Pray for me plays during Korea, and All the Stars plays during the credits. All the stars isn't even a R&B song.“Hated all the R&B music, I had to escape after 20 minutes”
There’s two R&B songs in the movie, and one plays in the end credits. Pretty sure you don’t even hear the other till about halfway through. Hell is dude talking about? Code if ever I heard it.
My point was you don’t hear any of those within the first 20 minutes. Nigga just being dramatic lmaoOpps/Pray for me plays during Korea, and All the Stars plays during the credits. All the stars isn't even a R&B song.
C'mon, pretending to say something about movies you haven't seen is the essence of arguing in bad faith. If you weren't still desperate to score "internet points" against me, you'd admit this to yourself and either seek out the damn films in question, or shut up.I don't need to see them for me to make the point I'm getting at.
It's not about I personally can tropify them, but whether they can be tropified at all. Which, as stories, they can be, by definition, as it has been done by the website you're objecting to and by the other user here.
If you're seriously going to shut down discussion because of this, you're not making your point, you're just sticking your fingers in your ears screaming "LALALALALALA I CAN'T YOU, THEREFORE YOU CAN'T PROVE MY POINT WRONG", which doesn't exactly sell me on the idea that your the type of person who would meaningfully listen to others points even if I did go out and watch one of these films right now.
OK, fine. Now, without consulting meaningless sources like your tropes website, explain to me the tropes 2001 falls back on to communicate its themes and narrative?Edit: actually, I was wrong. I have infact seen one of them. 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Your remark that all films, regardless of how obscure, are "still constrained to the same plot beats and tropes as any summer tentpole" is a pretty damn sweeping generalization considering the diversity of film expression, and tantamount to saying essentially what you are denying (i.e., that Eraserhead and Black Panther are essentially congruent in form). If you're going to make this claim that the titles I mentioned are "constrained to the same plot beats and tropes as any summer tentpole", then provide receipts; ones culled from your own critical faculties, not dubious inventories of minutiae.No one is drawing that comparison. You have this idea that just because you're into high-brow surrealist film, that it elevates you above us plebians who enjoy the occasional blockbuster and you use the excuse of your films not falling into typical tropes when, in fact, each film does and does so often to argue your point.
You're really doing nothing except demonstrating a willful lack of understanding of what tropes actually are. You are right that TV Tropes has no critical weight, but it's not because it's poor criticism. It's because it's not criticism at all. It's cataloging. A compilation of the story patterns that stories are made up of. It's criticism the same way a cookbook is criticizing cakes by explaining its ingredients contain eggs, flour, and sugar.C'mon, pretending to say something about movies you haven't seen is the essence of arguing in bad faith. If you weren't still desperate to score "internet points" against me, you'd admit this to yourself and either seek out the damn films in question, or shut up.
Moreover, a site like TV Tropes carries about the same critical weight as those Movie Sins videos you fanboys/girls get so worked up about--i.e., none at all. Cripes, at least cite from something scholarly and worth respecting if you're going to do the whole "appeal to authority" thing (after you see the films, of course).
Mindscrew, Things Man Was Not Meant to Know, AI is a Crapshoot, Humans are Bastards, Alternative Character Interpretation, What Do You Mean It wasn't Made on Drugs, being trapped in a torturous state without being able to express it, that one where the ending is just kinda incomprehensible, Pride goeth before the fall (or whatever it's called), just to name a few off the top of my head.OK, fine. Now, without consulting meaningless sources like your tropes website, explain to me the tropes 2001 falls back on to communicate its themes and narrative?
Keep digging. You're only making yourself look foolish, claiming you have any validity criticizing works of art you have not seen.That is why I don't need to see any movie to know that it easily uses tropes to tell any story, because tropes are what ANY story is made of. So while I can't say anything about the movies I haven't seen in terms of quality, I can say that they use tropes because every story does, the same way a painting uses paint. It's what defines it as a painting.
Ugh, you can't just drop these arbitrary terms and expect that to suffice. Defining your terms is ground zero for any argument, otherwise you're merely counting inventory. Describe the trope and where it is used in the film so that I can rebut accordingly. That's Discourse 101.Mindscrew, Things Man Was Not Meant to Know, AI is a Crapshoot, Humans are Bastards, Alternative Character Interpretation, What Do You Mean It wasn't Made on Drugs, being trapped in a torturous state without being able to express it, that one where the ending is just kinda incomprehensible, Pride goeth before the fall (or whatever it's called), just to name a few off the top of my head.
Keep digging. You're only making yourself look foolish, claiming you have any validity criticizing works of art you have not seen.
No, what discourse 101 is is actually being able to comprehend the simple, basic ideas of what the other person is trying to communicate to you. You either refuse to. Either that, or you are incapable of doing so, even though I'm not saying anything complicated.Ugh, you can't just drop these arbitrary terms and expect that to suffice. Defining your terms is ground zero for any argument, otherwise you're merely counting inventory. Describe the trope and where it is used in the film so that I can rebut accordingly. That's Discourse 101.
Some tropes are executed better than others duh.Why would anyone think saying a movie has so and so tropes is criticism? If using a trope was something worthy of criticisms then, I dunno, why even consume any media that has ever been made? Everything is just tropes in different orders.
Are you for real? This isn't a films studies course. I don't have to provide any receipts to my opinion. This isn't a critique of your favorite films. You challenged a poster to identify tropes in your favorite films and I obliged. Now you want to move the goalposts in an attempt to separate your cluster of auteur filmmaking with something as formulaic as a Marvel film. The point stands that films follow familiar tropes regardless of their obscurity or abstractness. That's the beginning and end of my comparisons between your films and Black Panther. I mean, something as artsy as Matthew Barney's Cremaster Cycle, which has never been released publicly (so this assumption that you have to have seen the film to remark on it is absurd and elitist) still has identifiable tropes. It has to. Human thinking only extends so far beyond the box.C'mon, pretending to say something about movies you haven't seen is the essence of arguing in bad faith. If you weren't still desperate to score "internet points" against me, you'd admit this to yourself and either seek out the damn films in question, or shut up.
Moreover, a site like TV Tropes carries about the same critical weight as those Movie Sins videos you fanboys/girls get so worked up about--i.e., none at all. Cripes, at least cite from something scholarly and worth respecting if you're going to do the whole "appeal to authority" thing (after you see the films, of course).
OK, fine. Now, without consulting meaningless sources like your tropes website, explain to me the tropes 2001 falls back on to communicate its themes and narrative?
Your remark that all films, regardless of how obscure, are "still constrained to the same plot beats and tropes as any summer tentpole" is a pretty damn sweeping generalization considering the diversity of film expression, and tantamount to saying essentially what you are denying (i.e., that Eraserhead and Black Panther are essentially congruent in form). If you're going to make this claim that the titles I mentioned are "constrained to the same plot beats and tropes as any summer tentpole", then provide receipts; ones culled from your own critical faculties, not dubious inventories of minutiae.
No goalposts have been moved, simply a demand to respond in good faith. Attempting to make claims about a film you haven't seen is arguing in bad faith, no matter what dubiously-sourced websites to which you wish to refer. In any case, I never argued that the films I mentioned were free from tropes, simply that they aren't nearly so propped up by them as are most blockbusters; nor can the tropes in them likely be identified as easily by someone (not a website) debating in good faith.You challenged a poster to identify tropes in your favorite films and I obliged. Now you want to move the goalposts in an attempt to separate your cluster of auteur filmmaking with something as formulaic as a Marvel film.
What "familiar tropes" do Mothlight and Dog Star Man follow?The point stands that films follow familiar tropes regardless of their obscurity or abstractness.
Marvel Movies are serious business. No is allowed to hate AFI top 100 material like Ant Man, Black Panther and the now the new entrant - one of the seminal works of this century that directors like Spielberg, Scorsese wish they made in their lives. - Infinity War.
You're kind of just embarrassing yourself at this point, all films follow tropes. There is a reason the expression exists, "nothing new under the sun."No goalposts have been moved, simply a demand to respond in good faith. Attempting to make claims about a film you haven't seen is arguing in bad faith, no matter what dubiously-sourced websites to which you wish to refer. In any case, I never argued that the films I mentioned were free from tropes, simply that they aren't nearly so propped up by them as are most blockbusters; nor can the tropes in them likely be identified as easily by someone (not a website) debating in good faith.
I'll repeat, you are the one whom made the claim that "obscure" art-house films are "still constrained to the same plot beats and tropes as any summer tentpole". So, back up your claim with an actual comparative analysis. Put up or shut up.
What "familiar tropes" do Mothlight and Dog Star Man follow?