admittedly a large generalization on my part, but it hurts me head when people can dunk on people all day long whether there be proof or allegations of nasty shit happening but when it involves someone/a game that is liked it's ok and people want to sit around and wait for proof
These allegations are coming from someone who:
If you want to wait around for proof that he was really watching 'barely legal' porn on his work equipment 'to figure out a magic trick' like he claims... then I think you give people far too much benefit of the doubt.
That's cool. Don't really have beef with anyone looking to buy the game after all, it's your money. But seeing people use the won't someone think of the employees or Devs reasoning is one of my pet peeves so I have to call it out when I see it.
"The magic trick" line was stupid, definitely. For the rest, we have absolutely no way to know if the girl was legal or not. I suppose it will be easier the now if he really funded those "Peacock Parties".
Well we already know that's true since Randy "I swear she's 18" Pitchfrod admitted it on a podcast. Only thing in question is whether or not the person was actually legal.
Maybe I wasn't clear enough the 'he' in 'like he claims' was meant to be Randy. He doesn't deny using his work provided equipment to watch porn featuring performers who look like teens. It's just a matter of if you believe his interest was purely 'magical' at this point.
You're comparing the views from one trailer of a game that is unreleased versus an expansion for a game that has been out for two years. Those numbers are pretty decent all things considered.
One's also a sequel to a game that hasn't had one since 2012 or so, the other is a game that has a large install base that's a proven success. Borderlands 3 won't fail or anything but randy pitchford is a negative against the game and his company. Borderlands would be better for it if he was gone and heck there's no guarentee that Borderlands 3 will achieve the same success of borderlands 2.
Pretty much
Convicted? This is from a civil suit from his former best friend who apparently had knowledge of these "crimes" and did nothing until he was fired. I don't think there is even a criminal investigation going on.
I consistently defend THQ because one person does not speak for hundreds
But presumably the people complicit in their silence are happy to let the 'one person' speak on their behalf?
It didn't have far more content than destiny 2, it had a good amount of content but they were fairly equal in content if anything before any dlc.
If you go to your boss and say such ideas are bad and asinine to do he will either most likely laugh at you or fire you if he is that asshole boss. So I wouldn't say they are complicit now if it was something more serious like dozens of staff being KKK members or Nazis or them funneling money to 8chan I could be behind a boycott but for some asshole doing something on their site not really a reason to.
Yeah cause he did all the game alone and all other ppl that worked in it dosnt deserve the credit for their work, they are all piece of shit, right ?
He's a rich white man with no morals. He's not going anywhere.
Would buying it used work? Would have to not buy any DLC tho.
He's the head of the studio that alone makes the game tainted. He's a known pos, so the others deserve credit but because he's the head of the studio that reflects on the game and everything else related to it.
You keep acting like there's a single entity on this site. People can be skeptical of one thing and condemn another.
People didn't need proof from THQ's stuff because the event was proof of itself: they hosted an endorsed AMA on that dreaded website. That much was clear from the get go.
yea honestly this is a bad comparison. Ive played a lot of Destiny and Division, and they are barely similar to borderlands. Borderlands does loot so much more free form than those two, same with content approach. Playing those games mostly made me yearn for borderlands.
