German rock band Rammstein sparks outrage over Nazi camp video

Oct 27, 2017
13,465
The hard rock band Rammstein sparked outrage in Germany after posting a promotional video where the band members are dressed up as Nazi concentration camp prisoners.

In the short video, which the band posted on Twitter, the band members have nooses around their necks and are dressed in the striped uniforms that Holocaust victims were made to wear in the death camps.

At least one band member appears to be waring a yellow Star of David that Jews were forced to wear by the Nazis.

Jewish groups and politicians swiftly condemned the video, saying that the band went too far.

"With this video, the band has crossed a line," Charlotte Knobloch, a Holocaust survivor and former president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, told the daily Bild newspaper.

"The instrumentalization and trivialization of the Holocaust, as shown in the images, is irresponsible," she added.
https://www.dw.com/en/german-rock-band-rammstein-sparks-outrage-over-nazi-camp-video/a-48093603
 
Dec 2, 2017
1,545
Rammstein making piss poor attempts at being provocative is also nothing new.
Non-Jewish people have no business wearing symbols of our oppression.
 

kraftdinner

Alt account
Banned
Mar 8, 2019
254
No, their music and shows are legit good
Yes, indeed. Very disappointing from them.

In case somebody does not know, Rammstein does not believe in right wing politics. They identify themselves as leftist, or neutral left. Their song Links 1 2 3 4 is their way of telling everyone who Rammstein really are.

That said, why the fuck would they do such a video, especially in the current context?
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
Unless the band themselves are Nazis or message is somehow being objectively pro-Nazi this just looks like another moral panic over music/art.
 

Kazura

Member
Sep 30, 2018
1,033
We'll have to see it in the context of the full video, but I imagine they're doing it from a critical point of view. I mean, the song is called "Deutschland", and the holocaust is a big part of their history, so if done tastefully, I don't see anything wrong with using holocaust imagery in a music video
 

Kazura

Member
Sep 30, 2018
1,033
Yes, indeed. Very disappointing from them.

In case somebody does not know, Rammstein does not believe in right wing politics. They identify themselves as leftist, or neutral left. Their song Links 1 2 3 4 is their way of telling everyone who Rammstein really are.

That said, why the fuck would they do such a video, especially in the current context?
Probably making a statement about the rise of the right worldwide, and this is a way to remind people of the consequences of that. But I'm just speculating
 

RDreamer

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,395
The actual video isn’t even out yet.

I'm pretty sure that the song "Deutschland" won't glorify the holocaust.
And yeah probably this. Leaks suggest it’s a song really torn about German history.

Also controversy is their thing.

Can’t wait to see/hear it. Their videos are always pretty incredible, too.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
Is it ok to say the N-word if I'm not actually racist?
Sure, society will largely be fine with it if it's a black person in music.

Just like many of us will be absolutely fine with this if the context/intent is what it is - https://www.resetera.com/threads/french-rapper-investigated-for-call-to-hang-white-people.71646/

I've been here and seen it all with moral panics with music. I've also seen how some are like slippery eels depending on the music/artist involved, instead of having a spine and remaining consistent with freedom of expression with art/music as long as context/intent can be deciphered.
 

Slipknot666

Banned
Dec 1, 2017
1,720
I’m sure Rammstein knows what they are doing. They just don’t give any fucks so don’t expect apologies or the video being taken down.
 

Engell

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,083
I'm assuming they are not glorifying what happened back then ... but hard to say anything on the subject when i haven't seen the video.
 

Wackamole

Member
Oct 27, 2017
14,612
Yeah these marketing stunts....

Anyway, what did they say about this? I can imagine they have some meaning with it.
 

Maligna

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,529
Canada
I knew a German lady who hated them simply because of the band's name.

I think it's a reference to an air show disaster where a bunch of people died? She thought that was tasteless.
 

Hydrus

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,298
Not trying to down play this, but maybe wait for the actual music video to drop to see what's it all about.
 

kingkaiser

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
218
Essen, Germany
Well, one could argue that trivializing and monetizing the holocaust started way back with the first Hollywood movies. I remember Schindlers List being heavily criticised for this back in the day.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
Not trying to down play this, but maybe wait for the actual music video to drop to see what's it all about.
But why wait for any context/intent to become clear? I must interject my own perceived context/intent into everything the second I read a headline by letting everyone know how outraged I am about something I filled in the blanks for.

Modern-day discourse. Facts/intent/context does not matter when I need to win an argument/get attention when the "news is hot".

Your dislike of provocative content being used within a greater intent/context is not a right for you to simply make shit up. It's a life lesson for you to be an adult and handle your own offence taking/tastes in media/art... like an adult.

Your feelings may be valid to you, and maybe even worth others listening to, but no one else has to respect you telling lies, deceiving, manipulating or being hypocritical. Speak factually, not with dishonesty or with an agenda.

Been here, seen it all with soo much music, where artistic freedom is thrown under a bus because people can't handle the fact there can be a degree of uncomfortable or boundary-pushing expression used. The meaningful stuff is often attempted with a serious message/intent or understandable context. Best to wait and see what this whole video/song is about.
 

RDreamer

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,395
It is not about glorification. This is about non-Jewish German men wearing symbols of Jewish suffering in a video to promote their music.
None of them are practicing (as far as fans know), but Lindemann is a Jewish name and I’ve heard a few times his mother was Jewish. Not much is known about the band but other have had the some speculation about them, too. Richard has a Jewish wedding ceremony when he married a Jewish woman.

Not that these things necessarily make whatever they’re doing. We don’t really know.

It’s also hard to characterize it because is it used to promote just “music” or are they making an artistic statement? Music is art. Music videos are art.
 

Engell

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,083
This is about non-Jewish German men wearing symbols of Jewish suffering in a video to promote their music.
I think they are just trying to show history, i don't understand what them being non-Jewish has to do with it.
So how did you want this to be solved...

should they hire people of the Jewish faith?
should they have a mix different people who where generally put to the deathcamps back then? (maybe they actually do this)
should they remove historical details? (maybe they actually do this)
should everyone just stay away from the subject in general?
 

Mikebison

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
11,036
This is a band who sold an album with dildos casted for the band members dicks, along with handcuffs and lube. So them going to this doesn't feel like a stretch. They clearly just try and court controversy.
 

Wiped

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
2,096
So we should pretend these atrocities didn't happen?

Art is supposed to be provoking and challenging. And Rammstein are a German band. They have the right to say 'this shouldn't happen again here or anywhere' surely?
 
Dec 2, 2017
1,545
None of them are practicing (as far as fans know), but Lindemann is a Jewish name and I’ve heard a few times his mother was Jewish. Not much is known about the band but other have had the some speculation about them, too. Richard has a Jewish wedding ceremony when he married a Jewish woman.

Not that these things necessarily make whatever they’re doing. We don’t really know.

It’s also hard to characterize it because is it used to promote just “music” or are they making an artistic statement? Music is art. Music videos are art.
Till Lindemann's father, Werner Lindemann, fought in the war for the Germans. It was not by choice though. His mother isn't Jewish either. She was a radio journalist.
 

des0lar

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
181
Since it's Rammstein and the promotion is apparently for their upcoming song Deutschland, the video is gonna be one long circlejerk about fascists taking over the world and people just watching.

They love to show the worst of humanity and this will be no different. It's gonna be a brutal takedown of current politics.

I can still see why wearing the Jewish star would make people uncomfortable, but I guess that's exactly what they wanted. Free promotion through outrage.
 

RDreamer

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,395
Till Lindemann's father, Werner Lindemann, fought in the war for the Germans. It was not by choice though. His mother isn't Jewish either. She was a radio journalist.
Didn’t know that. I heard his mother was Jewish a few times in the past. A lot is not really known about the band personally so probably just people throwing shit at the wall.
 
Dec 2, 2017
1,545
Didn’t know that. I heard his mother was Jewish a few times in the past. A lot is not really known about the band personally so probably just people throwing shit at the wall.
He was a children's book author and poet in the DDR and a pretty staunch socialist, which partly came from his experience during the war. I am just a bit taken aback by people dismissing the concerns of holocaust survivors like Charlotte Knobloch (whose grandmother was killed in Theresienstadt and who herself was saved from deportation) because this is supposed to be art. Art also has a responsibility towards those they depict.
 

RDreamer

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,395
He was a children's book author and poet in the DDR and a pretty staunch socialist, which partly came from his experience during the war. I am just a bit taken aback by people dismissing the concerns of holocaust survivors like Charlotte Knobloch (whose grandmother was killed in Theresienstadt and who herself was saved from deportation) because this is supposed to be art. Art also has a responsibility towards those they depict.
I’m trying not to dismiss. Just waiting to see the full context. It could be a shit-show. Or it could be an interesting statement.

I dunno, it’s like if a small clip of Inglourious Basterds came out before the movie. Rammstein to me has always been kind of Tarantino-esque. Maybe people have a problem with that movie, though. I guess I don’t know.

TIL that Rammstein are still putting out music.
I mean, it has been 10 years since their last release.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
He was a children's book author and poet in the DDR and a pretty staunch socialist, which partly came from his experience during the war. I am just a bit taken aback by people dismissing the concerns of holocaust survivors like Charlotte Knobloch (whose grandmother was killed in Theresienstadt and who herself was saved from deportation) because this is supposed to be art. Art also has a responsibility towards those they depict.
You can listen to someone's concerns and still think society is capable of moving forward without being authoritarian and censorious about everything someone is not happy with/takes offence to. That's usually where context and intent of the artist come into play and where rational people, even if they still dislike something, can assign it to a thing which we should cherish, not dismiss, freedom of speech/expression.

Rammstein themselves obviously hold quite a hands-off approach to censorship

– How have you managed to maintain the band for so much longer? Due to its continual image?

– We are hardworking, we work a lot, play almost all year round, and, when we’re not performing, we’re going into the studio to record new music. In addition, we try to keep up with the trends in modern music. For example, what was considered provocative about 20 years ago is now laughable.

– Such as?

– For example, the word “to fuck”. All possible forms of sex. Previously, it was considered to be absolutely, dangerously provocative. It would be cut out or subjected to censorship. Now, this is completely normal. And young people have a completely different attitude towards such things, owing in part to the Internet. To do something provocative in today’s medias field, you need to try very hard – it’s not so easy.
– As for your own videos: they can be quite rough and provocative. How do you come up with the stories? Is there anything that you would not allow yourself to show?

– No, no. You can do anything. We usually come up with ideas for the videos with the director: first, someone has an idea, we refuse it, we come up with a new one, we develop it – and so on until we achieve the necessary quality. Of course, when you want to be provocative, you need to figure out whether it would be shown at all. Therefore, you need to somehow get through the censorship and find the appropriate path.

Once, we shot a porno as a video and broadcast it via Visit-X (Note by “The Paper”: a major European porn site on which Rammstein posted the video for their song, “Pussy”). This meant that, initially, people had to download it through a porn site, which essentially crashed the site because everyone was trying to gain access. That was funny. But we had both censored and uncensored versions. So you can do anything you want, but you have to be sure that you’re aware of what exactly you’re doing. Otherwise, it doesn’t make sense to work and put in a lot of effort and money, just to end up with video no one would be able to see.

I do what I think is right. We have a democratic principle in the band: we decide together what to do, and we also criticize ourselves often. We have our own internal censorship. But when we are all satisfied with something, or at least all agree on it, we don’t care about any other opinions. Because if you take them into account, you encounter the problem of how to filter these opinions, while still allowing yourself to freely engage in creativity. A person must always do what he thinks and feels.
https://www.rammsteinpress.com/2017/08/26/you-really-need-to-try-hard-to-be-provocative-today/

YMMV where you draw your personal lines on expression, and of course, I'm not shocked to hear people directly impacted by an event would prefer no one to ever use said event, even in story-telling/creating art. But what is also incredibly frustrating is the intellectually dishonest approach to never considering intent or context and just making it up/ignoring it.

It used to be the right-wing Conservatives who were the kings/queens of doing that, there is an increasing rise in the left doing it now. Which, as "my side", really does my head in. I cannot stand hypocrisy, lies and/or people being dishonest in their pursuits of attention/manufacturing outrage in a way which ignores intent and context.

I'm also not a big fan of this culture we live in where as long as you can find your "token offended person", said person can be weaponized into accusations that if you don't agree with them, you in some way abuse/mock/ridicule them. As I said in my post, I can understand WHY people may NEVER approve of something used within art/music/film/tv/etc, and I can respect their absolutist stance for whatever emotional/impactful reasoning they give. However, I am still capable of being honest about something and having no moral qualms about explaining the context/intent of something controversial/provocative and why it existing is not the moral panic it may be suggested it is/could be.
 
Last edited:

ArnoldJRimmer

Banned
Aug 22, 2018
1,322
He was a children's book author and poet in the DDR and a pretty staunch socialist, which partly came from his experience during the war. I am just a bit taken aback by people dismissing the concerns of holocaust survivors like Charlotte Knobloch (whose grandmother was killed in Theresienstadt and who herself was saved from deportation) because this is supposed to be art. Art also has a responsibility towards those they depict.
Well, if it was up to some of these survivors, no artist would be allowed to say anything about it.

That's not something I personally, would want to happen. Hell, look at current issues with a certain middle eastern country. People say: never forget, but a lot of people have forgotten. I say let's keep the horrors of fascism, apartheid and ethnic cleansing alive in our minds. Respecting the past is fine, so long as it doesn't interfere with making damn sure we're not making the same mistakes in the future.

If the song inspires some young people to say fuck you to right-leaning ways of thinking, it's worth some hurt feelings, IMHO.