Germany rejects proposal to waive patent protection for COVID vaccines, "IP is a source of innovation"

jelly

Member
Oct 26, 2017
20,371
Pathetic.

Does their argument even make sense, it’s not forever, just these vaccines.
 

Krauser Kat

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,485
There should probably rules around the patent waving to kill any slippery slope arguments about future profits.

How many lives need to be saved by said thing to wave patent rights, is a gross question but 10000% in a discussion about the "worth" of a patent.

Ideally, all pharma research would be nationalized and medicine would become soft power, encouraging deplomacy.
 

krazen

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,324
Gentrified Brooklyn
I love that in the rare case the US steps up to do the right thing on an international level, someone else in the West is more than willing to play bad cop
 

Sankt Ra

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,768
Ah yes IP is just that more important than saving actual fucking lives.
Would making it free save more lives in Germany? How? There is universal healthcare. Just by making it free doesn't mean there is going to be more vaccines available faster. Or am I missing something.

Not defending this IP decision, by the way.
 

Mentosrock

Member
Nov 4, 2019
378
"IP is a source of innovation" as millions die.. This is the real life version of that post-apocalyptic meme of the exec telling kids about how he grew profit for people for a brief time.
 

Mazzle

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,378
Germany
Lemme tell you, that I am not surprised at all and I hate it.

Fickt euch CDU/CSU und auch ihr SPD. Dreckswichser
 

jchap

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,447
Why does the IP have to be released? Just subsidize distribution of the vaccine. It's not like these countries will be able to produce the vaccine without the raw materials for it anyway even if they have the technical formulation.
 

GSG

Member
Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,606
How much public money was used to make these vaccines possible?

The need to vaccinate humanity against a deadly virus should be greater than the need for big pharma to make big profits.
 

Xando

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
18,578
Why does the IP have to be released? Just subsidize distribution of the vaccine. It's not like these countries will be able to produce the vaccine without the raw materials for it anyway even if they have the technical formulation.
That's what Merkel is proposing
 

Kodama4

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,388
I am pretty sure the UK will say the same. They are very much against waiving the vaccine patents
 

Navidson REC

Member
Oct 31, 2017
2,528
As a German: Fuck this.

But also, who exactly is "Germany" in this tweet? Like, which governmental body made this decision, exactly? The tweet doesn't really provide any proper information. At any rate, I'm sure the CDU/CSU and also the SPD are fine with (or even behind) this bullshit.
Would making it free save more lives in Germany? How? There is universal healthcare. Just by making it free doesn't mean there is going to be more vaccines available faster. Or am I missing something.

Not defending this IP decision, by the way.
My understanding is that it would enable other drug makers to produce the vaccine, effectively increasing production capacities massively. Considering the fact that this pandemic is, by definition, global, it won't be over until we have proper vaccination rates across the globe. The virus will continue to mutate otherwise (which it likely will do anyway but the more we can stop this the better for all of us).
 

Xando

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
18,578
As a German: Fuck this.

But also, who exactly is "Germany" in this tweet? Like, which governmental body made this decision, exactly? The tweet doesn't really provide any proper information. At any rate, I'm sure the CDU/CSU and also the SPD are fine with (or even behind) this bullshit.
This comes directly from Merkel

 

Sankt Ra

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,768
My understanding is that it would enable other drug makers to produce the vaccine, effectively increasing production capacities massively. Considering the fact that this pandemic is, by definition, global, it won't be over until we have proper vaccination rates across the globe. The virus will continue to mutate otherwise (which it likely will do anyway but the more we can stop this the better for all of us).
You can't just pour new ingredients in your machines and go at it. They would need to go thru the whole validation process, in that time others would have already made a billion more doses.
 

Cyclonesweep

Member
Oct 29, 2017
6,808
From the tweet it sounds like they don't want to waive IPs in general.
Probably fear places won't even care anymore if they start waiving.

I feel like they need to pressure the developers to waive costs or help others manufacture it. I don't know if the gov stepping in and removing the IP rights is the right move.
 

Socivol

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,189
This is so sick to me. People are fucking dying and we are concerned about IP innovation? The lack of empathy for others in the face of making a dollar is really just gross.
 

Navidson REC

Member
Oct 31, 2017
2,528
You can't just pour new ingredients in your machines and go at it. They would need to go thru the whole validation process, in that time others would have already made a billion more doses.
Well, obviously. But some facilities claim they are ready to go. If producing "a billion more doses" were that fast we'd be swimming in them already.
 

Sankt Ra

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,768
AstraZeneca also claimed a lot and we all know how that turned out.
Wouldn't be any different to the ones that are "ready to go".

Well, obviously. But some facilities claim they are ready to go. If producing "a billion more doses" were that fast we'd be swimming in them already.
Biotech/ Pfizer expect 2,5billion doses this year. Their ramp up is growing faster then if a company started their ramp up now.
 
Last edited:

Clefargle

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,560
Limburg
Biden admin probably knew this would happen. Lets them look good while diverting blame for the IP situation being unresolved
 

El-Suave

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,746
You think the US, one of the most ruthless nations in the world when it comes to matters like this, would have made their proposal not knowing other countries would do this? Please, stop being so gullible.
 

WinniethePimp

Member
Oct 26, 2017
1,301
EU
Ignoring the obvious moral implications for a second, how is this logical in any way even IF they are out for profit? If the world can not get this virus under control quickly, the economies even of western countries will not recover because mutations will make this impossible. Bad for EVERY economy on the planet, theirs included.
 

Katharsios

Member
Mar 18, 2020
210
Pathetic.

Does their argument even make sense, it’s not forever, just these vaccines.
As i understand their argument is it took Biontech months to alter an production line from an existing plant to get production going.

So their reasoning seems to be that their is no short term gain in temporarily waving Patents and it would kill the incentive for future research endeavors.

Just answering your question, not defending their argument...
 

Navidson REC

Member
Oct 31, 2017
2,528
AstraZeneca also claimed a lot and we all know how that turned out.
Uh, what? Astra Zeneca has been used successfully in many, many, many cases.

Also, well, of course they should inspect those facilities before giving them the green light. Like, what are you arguing against? If they are deemed ready to go, they should get going. Lives are at stake.
 

HockeyBird

Member
Oct 27, 2017
9,470
As a German: Fuck this.

But also, who exactly is "Germany" in this tweet? Like, which governmental body made this decision, exactly? The tweet doesn't really provide any proper information. At any rate, I'm sure the CDU/CSU and also the SPD are fine with (or even behind) this bullshit.

My understanding is that it would enable other drug makers to produce the vaccine, effectively increasing production capacities massively. Considering the fact that this pandemic is, by definition, global, it won't be over until we have proper vaccination rates across the globe. The virus will continue to mutate otherwise (which it likely will do anyway but the more we can stop this the better for all of us).
I think the issue he is referring to is that the factories that capable of producing the vaccine are already at max capacity. Existing factories would need to be modified or whole new ones would need to be built to increase capacity and that could take months or years. So even if the IP is waived, no one can immediately step in start producing their own.

Now in the long run, releasing the IP protection could be beneficial. We'll be needing vaccines for years to come and having as many companies make their own could be good but I really don't know personally in the long run.
 
Nov 9, 2017
3,269
Germany is the de facto leader of the EU, so this might as well be the EU saying this. What happened to the benevolent EU?
 

Sankt Ra

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,768
is this happening? is the USA ahead of Germany on something?
Imo they want a reason to not share their doses with the world. Knowing well that no one can easily, in the short term produce anything.

But saying "hey its IP free now, make it yourself" is a easy way to hold on to your doses and look like the hero.
 

fragamemnon

Member
Nov 30, 2017
3,553
Why does the IP have to be released? Just subsidize distribution of the vaccine. It's not like these countries will be able to produce the vaccine without the raw materials for it anyway even if they have the technical formulation.
This is the reality of the situation. The idea that countries would all the sudden start investing in the needed industry and infrastructure if they only had the IP was always highly questionable. If countries already had the capacity, then licensing of vaccines to suitable manufacturers was already a thing that was happening.

However, the geopolitics of it all also matter. Yes, you cannot have a world where the research park countries give away their products (innovation) for free and the workshop countries manufacture the goods using the innovation and sell them to the people of the research park countries. That's why IP law exists.

But this isn't a normal set of intellectual properties-these are vaccines that are every country's best way out of the economic and social crush of the pandemic. You don't build worldwide trust in western liberal democracies by even remotely looking like you're hoarding the cure, and you give those countries a chance-if they are up for the challenge-to prove you wrong and set up crash vaccine programs, repurposing existing industry to meet the need. Most won't, and would be better served with exports, but when you deny them agency to do so you can't expect that they'll trust you much in the future.
 

Navidson REC

Member
Oct 31, 2017
2,528
I think the issue he is referring to is that the factories that capable of producing the vaccine are already at max capacity. Existing factories would need to be modified or whole new ones would need to be built to increase capacity and that could take months or years. So even if the IP is waived, no one can immediately step in start producing their own.

Now in the long run, releasing the IP protection could be beneficial. We'll be needing vaccines for years to come and having as many companies make their own could be good but I really don't know personally in the long run.
That is a fair point if there truly are no factories out there that could start producing once the IP rights have been waived. It is my understanding that those factories exist though but please don't quote me on this.

Anyway, my personal opinion on this is: If there are more factories out there that are capable of producing more vaccines, they should do this ASAP. The longer the virus spreads and mutates, the less likely are we, as humanity, to get rid of it for good.
 
Nov 9, 2017
3,269
People are acting like COVID vaccines are not going to be needed decades and decades to come. Holding on to the patent is securing profits until COVID-19 is essentially eradicated, which may never happen within our lifetimes.
 

ChippyTurtle

Member
Oct 13, 2018
4,304
I'm going to point out again, India has a vaccine completely home made, if it really wanted to fire a shot, waive IP on that.
 

Croc Man

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,215
Volvo invented the modern seatbelt. They let everyone use it because they valued the lives it would save over profits. Shame others don't act in a similar way more often.