Really is a mind bender at the moment, even members here say the disclosure was the same as in other videos.
EA is associating with bigots and paying them to be part of their platform promoting games. How is this not on EA and their awful gamechangers program?Hating EA is way more important than fighting bigots, of course!
EA's dumb af for this shit program.
Gggmanlives is also a proper shithead.
Boom.
The program lets them get the game into the hands of people who are interested in making content for it - videos, previews, cosplay, etc... while ensuring that their participation in it IS FULLY DISCLOSED... Isn't that what people want? This is literally a program that DOES NOT PAY PEOPLE, only provides them with the game or access to it - and requires you to mention every bit of your involvement in it.EA's dumb af for this shit program.
Gggmanlives is also a proper shithead.
Boom.
Did you actually read the last 30-40 posts?
EA has an issue with him calling it a review because he got the game for free from EA as "Game Changer".
total milkshake duck
The program lets them get the game into the hands of people who are interested in making content for it - videos, previews, cosplay, etc... while ensuring that their participation in it IS FULLY DISCLOSED... Isn't that what people want? This is literally a program that DOES NOT PAY PEOPLE, only provides them with the game or access to it - and requires you to mention every bit of your involvement in it.
This is exactly the kind of thing people have asked for in the past - transparent disclosure. People even got in trouble during the Apex Legends launch for forgetting to put the disclosure hashtag on their tweets about being at the early sessions. The program's a positive, they might want to make sure they check out the backgrounds of people they accept though...
The program lets them get the game into the hands of people who are interested in making content for it - videos, previews, cosplay, etc... while ensuring that their participation in it IS FULLY DISCLOSED... Isn't that what people want? This is literally a program that DOES NOT PAY PEOPLE, only provides them with the game or access to it - and requires you to mention every bit of your involvement in it.
This is exactly the kind of thing people have asked for in the past - transparent disclosure. People even got in trouble during the Apex Legends launch for forgetting to put the disclosure hashtag on their tweets about being at the early sessions. The program's a positive, they might want to make sure they check out the backgrounds of people they accept though...
Is this a summary of how things unfolded? The last page has confused me.
Most of the game changers videos/tweets are from people pretty conscientious about following the rules.The problem seems to be he put it out as a review. The original upload did fully disclose it was made possible by EA Game Changers.
Update (2/22/2019): EA has shared additional information with GameDaily related to the Gggmanlives Anthem video and the allegations that EA had it removed for negative content. EA runs two separate programs for influencer and content creator videos. Game Changers is the unpaid program (that will cover expenses to EA events), but as we know from the Apex Legends launch, EA also does directly sponsor influencers to generate content.
There are two separate watermarks that are used in these instances. For Game Changers, the watermark says, "Presented by Game Changers." That's the watermark Gggmanlives used in the past and told GameDaily was present on his original video (before it was re-uploaded). The other watermark, used when there's a sponsored content agreement and money changes hands is "Sponsored by EA."
EA has confirmed to GameDaily that it specifically requested that Gggmanlives replace the "Presented by Game Changers" watermark on the video with the one that reflects sponsorship, because that was the relationship for this content. He previously published another video from an event EA hosted in Tokyo with the Game Changers watermark that he says met EA's approval.
In a conversation on Twitter via direct message, Gggmanlives confirmed to me that he did receive compensation for this video, but claims it was under the Game Changers program (which EA told GameDaily in a comment earlier does not support review videos). As stated in the original story below, EA does not typically pay Game Changers more than a small stipend for incidentals when flying them out to events.
Gggmanlives has also tempered his assertion that EA has definitely blacklisted him. "I assume that relationship is severed now," he told me.
In his re-uploaded video and in a tweet pre-dating the re-upload, Gggmanlives is confident EA has blacklisted him. "I had to re-edit my original review for Anthem, because it was deemed too negative," he says. "And I guess on top of that, I've been added to the long list of blacklisted YouTubers."
Gggmanlives declined to share the contract he signed related to the videos or his correspondence with an EA PR representative in which he says that he was told to remove the video for its contents.
Lol the dude can't even get his bullshit story straight, ''I assume that relationship is severed now'' = ''EA BLACKLISTED ME BECAUSE I'M TOO HONEST!!1'' apparently.
No the original comment said he said he was blacklisted to save face. And niether of these scenarios make sense for him to "save face"That he lied that he was blacklisted and that EA told him to take the video down because of the negative review?
Thank you for this, will update the OP when back in a few minutes.
EA has confirmed to GameDaily that it specifically requested that Gggmanlives replace the "Presented by Game Changers" watermark on the video with the one that reflects sponsorship, because that was the relationship for this content.
There are two separate watermarks that are used in these instances. For Game Changers, the watermark says, "Presented by Game Changers." That's the watermark Gggmanlives used in the past and told GameDaily was present on his original video (before it was re-uploaded). The other watermark, used when there's a sponsored content agreement and money changes hands is "Sponsored by EA."
EA has confirmed to GameDaily that it specifically requested that Gggmanlives replace the "Presented by Game Changers" watermark on the video with the one that reflects sponsorship, because that was the relationship for this content. He previously published another video from an event EA hosted in Tokyo with the Game Changers watermark that he says met EA's approval.
In a conversation on Twitter via direct message, Gggmanlives confirmed to me that he did receive compensation for this video, but claims it was under the Game Changers program (which EA told GameDaily in a comment earlier does not support review videos). As stated in the original story below, EA does not typically pay Game Changers more than a small stipend for incidentals when flying them out to events.
So did SkillUp every clarify himself since I see a few pages back he was in "just asking questions" mode, while claiming EA unjustly took down his video?people tried to make it so EA put down a "bad" review of Anthem, when in reality the problem was that this dude never disclosed he was given the game by EA themselves
Well that's shocking. Turns out gamergate isn't about ethics in videogames journalism.
Well that's shocking. Turns out gamergate isn't about ethics in videogames journalism.
Notice he doesn't apologise or walk back his bigoted beliefs, he still holds to them so really the age of the tweets got no relevance.I tweeted out the image from this thread tonight, showing his fairly recent homophobic and sexist "evil feminist" tweets, in response to the string between him and the guy from EA.
Gggmanlives replied to me, saying something like, "Imagine cherry picking old tweets to find something negative."
My mentions were immediately bombarded by what GamerGate goons, calling me a fag, cuck, autistic, etc.
These are sad, little people.
Notice he doesn't apologise or walk back his bigoted beliefs, he still holds to them so really the age of the tweets got no relevance.
I tweeted out the image from this thread tonight, showing his fairly recent homophobic and sexist "evil feminist" tweets, in response to the string between him and the guy from EA.
Gggmanlives replied to me, saying something like, "Imagine cherry picking old tweets to find something negative."
My mentions were immediately bombarded by what GamerGate goons, calling me a fag, cuck, autistic, etc.
These are sad, little people.
And to think, there was a guy here a page or two back swearing up and down that this dude was not political and definitely not in a GG crowd. As soon as you actually dig up his shit, the attack dogs get sent out with his GG whistle. Wonder if that poster will come back and acknowledge the receipts he was so desperately looking for.
Sorry to hear you are being harassed, you don't deserve that.
I wonder too if ShadowAUS has changed his tune about Gggmanlives.And to think, there was a guy here a page or two back swearing up and down that this dude was not political and definitely not in a GG crowd. As soon as you actually dig up his shit, the attack dogs get sent out with his GG whistle. Wonder if that poster will come back and acknowledge the receipts he was so desperately looking for.
Sorry to hear you are being harassed, you don't deserve that.
For inadvertently revealing the bullshit that is an EA shill program? Hell no.
Revealing what now lmaoFor inadvertently revealing the bullshit that is an EA shill program? Hell no.
Lying about being sponsored by the same company he accused of foul play. Amazing.
Cheers for linking that, indeed that is pretty much indefensible. As I said not here to handwave, just to make sure the anger is actually deserved. Which in the case of those tweets it is.I wonder too if ShadowAUS has changed his tune about Gggmanlives.