• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

hrœrekr

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
May 3, 2019
1,655
They sign contracts.

But from what I've read, what they are told (vids will be sold to foreign markets and not uploaded online) and what they sign are different. In some cases they aren't given enough time to read the contract because the producers are hurrying it along and get annoyed if the girl wants to read every page.

It's a high pressure environment. Full grown Adults get talked into buying timeshares and cars they don't want and fall prey to scams every day from fast talkers that use effective high pressure tactics. Now imagine you're 18 with no money, nowhere to stay, no way home, in a room with a bunch of annoyed men telling you to sign a contract or else.

The difference between what they are told and what they sign is entirely their fault, as unfortunate as it is. Seriously, at 18 you know what is a contract.
However, being pressured to sign a contract without reading and understanding all the terms is criminal. Wouldn't that be enough to invalidate the contract?
 

Tobor

Member
Oct 25, 2017
28,503
Richmond, VA
I don't think it's that difficult of a concept: porn that's ethically produced, aka not abusing, coercing, threatening or anything to the actors, everything is consensual and there's no pressure to do something they aren't comfortable with.

Dude, I get all that. It was just the phrasing and where my brain went. I thought I was being clear.
 

hodayathink

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,055
i imagine blackambush and other sites will be seeing lawsuits their way soon considering some scenes on blackambush especially have had girls walk out/ told on film it wont be published online, they also have film scenes they haven't distributed on their site but distributed them under a different name because the models didnt agree to things.

From what I know, BlackAmbush is actually one of the sites where the whole "it's just for private use" is just part of the performance.

What I've found generally works when trying to determine whether these sites are shady or not is that the more "one and done" performers a site has, the worse they are ethically. Women that have an enjoyable first shoot generally go on to shoot more scenes.
 
Oct 25, 2017
9,107
I want to give these gals the best possible tools to handle the coercive situation, social pressure and the implication of possibly making strange men angry. A 21 year old is far better able to handle this compared to an 18 year old. A 25 year old would be even more preferable based on the prefrontal cortex growth, but you know as well as I do that there's far too much resistance upgrading the legal age to 21, let alone 25.

I'd like to prevent things from happening in the first place, as well as punish the offenders if they do end up coercing the victims.
You're right that 21 is better than 18, and it would hopefully significantly reduce the number of situations like this. And yeah, changing the age of majority would be no simple task.
 

Casa

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,534
For reference, here are a couple of pics of some of the women signing the contracts prior to filming:
9sKl1c8J.jpg

GirlsDoPorn.E440.BTS.1080p.x265.mkv.0005.jpg


As you can see, these aren't some thick stacks of dense paper. They had to have read over this thing, so I'm going to guess the producers falsified these contracts to get them to agree to it.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
This is way more common than people want to believe. Porn industry has huge problems and tons of unethical practices, it needs to be more heavily regulated. Everyone who watches porn should listen to a podcast called The Last Days of Autumn, it investigates the suicide of an up and coming young porn star and becomes much more about the level of manipulation and abuse rampant in the industry even for it's big stars. This includes things like filming testimonials from performers after a scene is shot to have evidence that everything is consensual, but they withhold the paycheck for the shoot until AFTER the performers say everything is OK. The obvious implied threat there is that you wont get paid unless you say everything was fine on tape. And that's happening to the big, well-known, award-winning performers. Now imagine what it's like if you are a no-name or new to the industry. It's fucked up.
 
Oct 28, 2017
27,133
Wait, "Privately traded Porn" is a thing?

I'm confused. So they are down to do porn only if no one sees it or only of the private circle sees it? But if it goes public is bad?
 
Oct 28, 2017
27,133

Musubi

Unshakable Resolve - Prophet of Truth
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
23,611
So....its obviously not cool at all to exploit people like that but...really unsure of how these girls didnt realize the tapes would be all over the internet.
 
Oct 27, 2017
39,148
So, they were okay with prostitution, but not porn? Maybe they shouldn't have showed up to a porn SHOOT and had sex ON CAMERA and signed the release forms.

I'm not hating on sex workers, I think it should be legalized if a person is willing, but their claim is absurd. You sign the contract, you willingly had sex on film, you took the payment, case closed.
What the hell am I even reading?

Prostitution and Porn are very different things. Pornstars are acting, doesn't matter how they do it, at the end of the day it is acting on video under strict contracts.

Prostitutes are people who do service. Just like a massage but in this case it is sex.
Neither of these jobs are anything to ashamed off and they are not the same thing.

Kindly get the fuck out and learn to have empathy. They were tricked by some disgusting sons of bitches into doing porn.
 

uzipukki

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,722
I would have left. I've showed up for job interviews and they offered something completely out of left field and im like yeah bro, no.


Was leaving not an option? Am I missing that? I feel like im missing something.
But if you wanted to do a porn and those two were your option? You're acting like these women shouldn't want to do a porn movie to be quite honest. Like lets forget the coercion for a moment. From your post it kinda read like "they got what they deserved, stupid women thinking it would only be for a select few to see".
 

Deleted member 4346

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,976
Oh wow. I thought Girls Do Porn was staged? It's suspicious that a lot of these girls never do a second scene in the industry, and many of them are visibly uncomfortable during scenes, but I guess I never thought about that. Oof. These allegations are pretty awful.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
So....its obviously not cool at all to exploit people like that but...really unsure of how these girls didnt realize the tapes would be all over the internet.
They were told they wouldn't be. Naive? Yes, but they were still lied to. Sorry, but it's not OK to excuse a predatory porn company for lying to young women. They picked women between 18-22 because they are more likely to be naive and easily misled.
 

skipgo

Member
Dec 28, 2018
2,568
Were people in the other thread bringing suits against their dates? Otherwise this comparison is less intelligent than you clearly think it is.
The point is the double standard, women got judged and labeled mentally unstable and criminals over a very minor misdemeanor.
And when an actual crime is committed against them, people always want to see more proof and explanations even with 22 different people with the same allegation of being lied to.
People are even trying to find pictures of the alleged contracts as if that magically means there was no foul play in this case.
 

Kalamoj

Member
Oct 28, 2017
532
Europe
For reference, here are a couple of pics of some of the women signing the contracts prior to filming:
9sKl1c8J.jpg

GirlsDoPorn.E440.BTS.1080p.x265.mkv.0005.jpg


As you can see, these aren't some thick stacks of dense paper. They had to have read over this thing, so I'm going to guess the producers falsified these contracts to get them to agree to it.
Tbh, I don't think so. They probably never had to.
Just imagine, money on the table (a lot more than they usually got for any other work), while a nice guy constantly talking and putting pressure on them. I would be suprised if any of the girls even read the full document.
 

Musubi

Unshakable Resolve - Prophet of Truth
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
23,611
They were told they wouldn't be. Naive? Yes, but they were still lied to. Sorry, but it's not OK to excuse a predatory porn company for lying to young women. They picked women between 18-22 because they are more likely to be naive and easily misled.
I'm not remotely excusing what happened. Maybe it's a perspective that I cant relate with but If someone wanted to film me doing sex stuff that wasn't my S/O that my instant assumption would be that it would be everywhere on the internet
 
Oct 28, 2017
27,133
But if you wanted to do a porn and those two were your option? You're acting like these women shouldn't want to do a porn movie to be quite honest. Like lets forget the coercion for a moment. From your post it kinda read like "they got what they deserved, stupid women thinking it would only be for a select few to see".


Huh? I didnt think they showed up to do porn at all. I read the story like they showed up for a modeling gig and they changed it on them to do porn. They can do what they want its not up to me. It has nothing to do with them being stupid or women and there is nothing like that coming from my post. Fall back.


I did (admittedly) miss the part about them being stuck and put into that choice but I owned that already.
 

Any Questions

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,074
UK
I've read half a dozen unconfirmed stories about them in the past, basically they set it up as a modeling shoot/nude modeling, fly the girl out to Los Angeles, and then tell them that it's actually porn.

If the girl refuses, they don't pay her and refuse to give her the return plane ticket/pay for a hotel. Most girls would be to embarrassed to call their family and tell them why they are stranded in LA. So they then coerce them by telling the girl it's for a private collector, no one will see it, ECT.

Here is an ama one of the supposed models did. There is no proof, but it lines up with what had come out about the company in the following years.


That poor girl. My heart goes out to her.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
I'm not remotely excusing what happened. Maybe it's a perspective that I cant relate with but If someone wanted to film me doing sex stuff that wasn't my S/O that my instant assumption would be that it would be everywhere on the internet
Yeah that would be a safe assumption. Which is why I said that it was naive for them to believe it. Doesn't change the fact that they were taken advantage of. That's why they were targeting women this young, the likelihood of naivety is high (for both men and women of this age, obviously).
 

subpar spatula

Refuses to Wash his Ass
Member
Oct 26, 2017
22,140
Crush them, women. The signs were there shit was going sideways. I remember there being one where a woman started crying afterward after they followed her to the bathroom. I always thought it was part of the whole act but now it makes sense. Fuck these dudes. Take all their money and toss em in jail.
 

thecouncil

Member
Oct 29, 2017
12,341
The point is the double standard, women got judged and labeled mentally unstable and criminals over a very minor misdemeanor.
And when an actual crime is committed against them, people always want to see more proof and explanations even with 22 different people with the same allegation of being lied to.
People are even trying to find pictures of the alleged contracts as if that magically means there was no foul play in this case.
People just want to continue jacking off to these vids without the guilt. That's really what it comes down to, I'm betting. It's similar to why Trump can't be a racist because "I wouldn't vote for a racist."
 
Oct 27, 2017
5,865
Mount Airy, MD
So they actually made the concept of the thing real instead of set dressing? If so that's incredibly dumb and exploitative.

Edit: Just read some of the stories. Scratch that, this is straight up rape.

Right? I always assumed these kinds of setups for porn were just for show, and everything was on the up and up otherwise. It's fucked up that they're legitimately doing this to people, and I hope they get taken down for it.
 

Spock

Member
Oct 27, 2017
769
I hope they take every penny from these shady fucks. They also totally need to raise that age limit as others mentioned. 18-22, while I get they're not kids the ground is still quite soft psychologically for most.
 

pizoxuat

Member
Jan 12, 2018
1,458
Yo, just to spell it out, if you read this and continue to watch their videos you are literally getting off to real world exploitation and non-consensual porn. As opposed to the fake, fetishized exploitation and non-consensual porn that several other of you are admitting you like, which makes me feel gross personally, but ok.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
I've read half a dozen unconfirmed stories about them in the past, basically they set it up as a modeling shoot/nude modeling, fly the girl out to Los Angeles, and then tell them that it's actually porn.

If the girl refuses, they don't pay her and refuse to give her the return plane ticket/pay for a hotel. Most girls would be to embarrassed to call their family and tell them why they are stranded in LA. So they then coerce them by telling the girl it's for a private collector, no one will see it, ECT.

Here is an ama one of the supposed models did. There is no proof, but it lines up with what had come out about the company in the following years.

And people will still victim blame
 

Puroresu_kid

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
9,465
The girls I would say were niave but I have no doubt there would be coercion here and lies to convince them to do what they wanted.
 

HylianSeven

Shin Megami TC - Community Resetter
Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,069
I didn't see the response in question in the page archive but I guess I'm confused what makes it particularly relevant to that poster anyway
That was my thought too. It's like the thing about Projared's ex-wife when it came out that they tried a polyamorous relationship, lots of people suddenly jumped to Jared's defense saying "Well it was an open relationship, therefore it wasn't cheating! Her story is bullshit!" Conveniently ignoring the fact that it's possible to cheat in a polyamorous relationship...and the even bigger fact that Jared exchanged nudes with underage girls.
 
Oct 25, 2017
5,846
The point is the double standard, women got judged and labeled mentally unstable and criminals over a very minor misdemeanor.
And when an actual crime is committed against them, people always want to see more proof and explanations even with 22 different people with the same allegation of being lied to.
People are even trying to find pictures of the alleged contracts as if that magically means there was no foul play in this case.
You want to bring up a double standard, go ahead and highlight the posters who were actually saying they were unstable criminals and are in here demanding high burdens of proof. Otherwise you're just combining two different opinions to feed your own self regard.
 

Avitus

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,919
Don't the same people run the exploited college girls website? Like it's right in the name.
 

Tapiozona

Avenger
Oct 28, 2017
2,253
I don't see how the defense of "but it was ripped on the interwebs not our fault" works when the defendants are uploading and hosting the videos on their official channel on the US' largest streaming site.
I'm guessing the contracts, which they probably didn't read, and signed are pretty clear on the actual distribution.
 

ascagnel

Member
Mar 29, 2018
2,212
The difference between what they are told and what they sign is entirely their fault, as unfortunate as it is. Seriously, at 18 you know what is a contract.

If you're given terms for a contract in one manner (eg verbally), and then made to sign a contract that includes different terms, it's still coercion. It only becomes a matter of proving the verbal statements.