Government set to shut down as Sen. Cornyn says no vote (UP: shutdown started)

FaceHugger

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
13,950
USA
Can someone explain why Paul Ryan just won't pass the spending bill that would keep the government going?

IIRC, he is retiring soon, so it's not like he has to lick Trump's boots to keep his job.
Trump still needs to sign it. The House and Senate can pass every bill they want. Ryan is on the way out so I guess he's just sticking to his pussy, milquetoast routine until the bitter end.
 

Luminish

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,504
Denver
It doesn't really matter if Paul Ryan is a pushover, opportunist, loyalist, or true believer. He'll do whatever the party wants and right now the party wants to try at their likely last chance to get a wall.
 

Chie Satonaka

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,669
Can someone explain why Paul Ryan just won't pass the spending bill that would keep the government going?

IIRC, he is retiring soon, so it's not like he has to lick Trump's boots to keep his job.
Ryan is trash who's wanted to destroy Medicare and Social Security since he was in COLLEGE.

Expecting anything even remotely good from him is like expecting to be a multiple powerball winner.
 

Border

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,859
I forget whatever the latest rules are, but I think they'd need 61 votes to be veto proof. There is no way in hell they're getting that, especially with over half of the GOP senators having left DC early.
Half the GOP plus most of the Democrats would give them 60, though I'm not sure if Democrats would want to give Trump the opportunity to claim any kind of victory.
 

TheRuralJuror

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,683
Well, it appears I dug myself into a hole and there's no way out. So I'll just say this, what I was trying to get at, is that partyline politics causing any kind of shutdown, regardless of reason, is ridiculous.

Whether it's healthcare, a temper tantrum for a magical fence, a budget can't be enforced, whatever the reason. All members of the house and senate should be held responsible whenever a shutdown occurs.
Oh give it a rest. This is nonsensical. I’m all about looking at situations objectively, but give us a break. There’s really no need to both sides any situation simply for the sake of doing so. A shit sandwich is sometimes just that.
 

cakely

Member
Oct 27, 2017
13,103
Chicago
Look. If I want to punch you in the face and take your money and you dont want me to punch you in the face and take your money, arent we both in the wrong for not working together. I mean you are unwilling to compromise just as much as I am, so its both our faults for not reaching an agreement. In fact I would even say you care less about whats right and more about stopping me from getting what I want. You are just as bad as me for not letting me get my way.

So are you gonna let me punch you in the face and take your money or are you going to keep being an asshole and opposing me for opposition sake? The choice is yours.
Oh, that’s good.

This was not the thread for a “both sides” post,
 

Seneset

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,041
Limbus Patrum
I forget whatever the latest rules are, but I think they'd need 61 votes to be veto proof. There is no way in hell they're getting that, especially with over half of the GOP senators having left DC early.
I was about to say they have the votes, till you reminded me more than half of congress went home. For once I'm actually curious to see what the Republicans spin will be tomorrow. Though I assume it'll be blaming the democrats just like Trump was doing.
 

FaceHugger

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
13,950
USA
Well, it appears I dug myself into a hole and there's no way out. So I'll just say this, what I was trying to get at, is that partyline politics causing any kind of shutdown, regardless of reason, is ridiculous.

Whether it's healthcare, a temper tantrum for a magical fence, a budget can't be enforced, whatever the reason. All members of the house and senate should be held responsible whenever a shutdown occurs.
Listen man, I don't want to dogpile on you - I really don't. But you've been proven to be factually incorrect. It's OK to admit fault and issue a mea culpa. We'll all forget about this thread by tomorrow night anyway.
 

Deleted member 29806

User requested account closure
Banned
Nov 2, 2017
2,047
Germany
Sorry, not a native speaker, but Trump now tweets a lot about „BORDER SECURITY“. Is that somehow connected to „BOARDER SECURITY“?
 

FaceHugger

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
13,950
USA
Sorry, not a native speaker, but Trump now tweets a lot about „BORDER SECURITY“. Is that somehow connected to „BOARDER SECURITY“?
No, he is referring to the border between the US and Mexico. Because he's a racist who thinks all Mexican and South American immigrants are drug dealers, drug mules, or gang members.
 

KojiKnight

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,102
Sorry, not a native speaker, but Trump now tweets a lot about „BORDER SECURITY“. Is that somehow connected to „BOARDER SECURITY“?
Border security is code for his giant wall he wants to build along the Mexican-US border. It has nothing to do with security or anything else so much as his ego stroking wall.
 

Pwnz

Member
Oct 28, 2017
10,587
Places
For those entirely blaming Trump for this, you are wrong. This entirely is on Paul Ryan. He could have told the President to fuck off and put a vote to the floor and passed with a veto proof number. He didn’t, because he is huge a huge pussy. He had one last chance to do the right thing against this president before he’s gone and he chose not to.
Why not both.gif
 

Jobbs

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,033
Half the GOP plus most of the Democrats would give them 60, though I'm not sure if Democrats would want to give Trump the opportunity to claim any kind of victory.
He can't claim victory if he doesn't get wall funding. I mean, he can, but it won't matter. Fox news and Rush Limbaugh and Anne Coulter literally turned on him over him not getting money for the wall. That's the reason he decided to shut things down.

I honestly don't know how this ends and I don't see a path out because Trump is stubborn and doesn't care about people or the country and Democrats (rightly) won't agree to fund a wall. We're in completely uncharted waters.
 

Sho_Nuff82

Member
Nov 14, 2017
11,767
He can't claim victory if he doesn't get wall funding. I mean, he can, but it won't matter. Fox news and Rush Limbaugh and Anne Coulter literally turned on him over him not getting money for the wall. That's the reason he decided to shut things down.

I honestly don't know how this ends and I don't see a path out because Trump is stubborn and doesn't care about people or the country and Democrats (rightly) won't agree to fund a wall. We're in completely uncharted waters.
It ends when the Senate bill that was proposed in January is reintroduced with the new Congress, and speaker Pelosi actually lets the House vote on it unlike Cowardly Ryan. Veto-proof majority lets president baby say it's not his fault the establishment doesn't want the wall. He keeps his diehard supporters without actually having to do anything, the rest of us keep our sanity.
 

LogN-

Member
Oct 30, 2017
198
Listen man, I don't want to dogpile on you - I really don't. But you've been proven to be factually incorrect. It's OK to admit fault and issue a mea culpa. We'll all forget about this thread by tomorrow night anyway.
Indeed, I definitely did not articulate what I was going for. As a result of that, yup, gotta back down and apologize this time :). I wish I was better at explaining myself sometimes lol.

This time was not that time, so yes, I'll pack it up and take the loss :D
 

O-Zips

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,217
Is 5 billion all they need to build rhe wall??? Seems like a drop in the bucket.
Wouldn't even come close. The only thing I can see is that Trump is pitifully hoping to force through a pseudo-victory he can claim to his base when nothing real would be done, or the hope is that he gets this money now, gets the wall started, and then uses the fact that -something- has been done as a way to try and force more money towards it next year.
 

Gabbo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,993
Is 5 billion all they need to build rhe wall??? Seems like a drop in the bucket.
Isn't the 5Billion just trump's public dollar value? And while in the broad scheme of the US government it's not the biggest amount, that amount could go to literally anything else and be more useful. Health care, education, helping the homeless, etc. Instead a big cement/steel wall for Trumpy
 

Pwnz

Member
Oct 28, 2017
10,587
Places
Is 5 billion all they need to build rhe wall??? Seems like a drop in the bucket.
More like a trillion. I dont think people appreciate the scale. Driving from Brownsville to LA is like 30 hours of highway. Also a lot of the border are mountains/hills/desert.

With that kind of money we could build enough wind and solar farms to make a huge jump towards 100% renewables.
 

Whompa

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
4,254
More like a trillion. I dont think people appreciate the scale. Driving from Brownsville to LA is like 30 hours of highway. Also a lot of the border are mountains/hills/desert.

With that kind of money we could build enough wind and solar farms to make a huge jump towards 100% renewables.
He’ll you could probably fix a lot of public schools with that money too.

God imagine having a country that gave a shit about the future?
 

UltimateHigh

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,251
We could allocate an extra 5 billion towards programs (not you know, cutting them) and people that truly need it, instead of xenophobic structures that will always be a burden.

It's infuriating to think about all the good we could do if so many people weren't shitheels.
 
Nov 30, 2017
809
You do know that the Republican Party is an unelected (well, not elected fairly ) criminal syndicate that controls all branches of government, has a massive propaganda machine that has 30-40% of the country brainwashed into Nazi zombies, the police are armed like the military, and there are child concentration camps on the border, right?

Who can possibly "kick the president out of office" without being murdered or imprisoned? The Republicans won't do it, since corruption is a good thing to them. And the Democrats can't win enough seats in Congress because the rules vastly favor white people in the countryside over everyone else. We're hostage.
“Brainwashed”
 

Ithil

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,972
Is 5 billion all they need to build rhe wall??? Seems like a drop in the bucket.
Multiply by ten and you still wouldn't be close. Trump has gotten fixated on this 5 billion number recently, but even during the campaign at the height of his self-fellating bullshit he claimed he could build it for 10 billion. Last shutdown the WH was demanding 25 billion for it, and even conservative estimates for such an endeavor are upwards of 70, if not 100 billion.

I think the 5 billion is more about getting an amount specifically for such a wall, to point to as it "starting". Even though it wouldn't even cover the cost of the access roads and land puchased required to get to the parts to start planning construction, let alone building it.
If he doesn't get money for it now, it will never happen in any capacity, period, because the Dem House coming in January will never bring forth a bill that includes it. So it's now or never with this last minute tantrum, which will also fail.
 
Nov 30, 2017
809
Indeed, I definitely did not articulate what I was going for. As a result of that, yup, gotta back down and apologize this time :). I wish I was better at explaining myself sometimes lol.

This time was not that time, so yes, I'll pack it up and take the loss :D
It seems like to me, you are still trying to work you way out of it by blaming your communication skills and not the fact that your logic top to bottom was wrong. Your entire premise was wrong. Literally every thought you had following reading the news about this specific topic was incorrect factually. It wasn’t your communication man, it was the fact that you were just flat out wrong. You can own that without blaming how you said what you said. There’s no way to correctly present completely false information.
 

Bandage

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,609
The Internet
Brainwashed might have been a strong word a week ago. Buy now that republican voters are literally trying to crowdfund THE WALL, I’d say it’s apt.
Brainwashed implies they aren't fully responsible for their actions.
They know fully well they're racist shit bags and enjoy it.
Never give conservatives the benefit of the doubt.
 

Hycran

The Fallen
Oct 30, 2017
1,493
Brainwashed implies they aren't fully responsible for their actions.
They know fully well they're racist shit bags and enjoy it.
Never give conservatives the benefit of the doubt.
I don’t think the two are mutually exclusive. Republicans are so comedically inept and unable to reflect inwards on the hypocracy of their actions that I don’t even think they fully appreciate how moronic they are. Even though at their core they are often misogynistic, homophobic, transphobic, “inset x”-phobic, etc, I think you can only get there both by being a horrible person, but also by being raised by horrible people, watching horrible Fox News, and more.
 

Shoeless

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,162
Because his quote about meeting in the middle with Nazis is easily the best quote to think about when dealing with so called moderates wanting to compromise with the alt right or the current state of the Republican party.
True. It's easy to be a moderate when you can safely say, "Look, if they want to kill you, why don't you just let them HALF kill you? Don't be a jerk, compromise!"

People that can criticize other people for not agreeing to be half-killed in compromise aren't actually in the fight. It's why they find it so much easier to say, "Oh, just roll over and stop filling up my feed with your bad news, I don't want to hear it anymore."

Of course in Boogie's case, when it came to something that did personally affect him, like fat shaming, then suddenly there was ZERO compromise, and that evil has to be Fought & Defeated.