I like Watchmen fine but I've never been as high as on it as most everyone else. For my money, Moore's best work is Supreme, Miracleman, and Tom Strong.
That Supreme run never gets the credit it deserves.
I like Watchmen fine but I've never been as high as on it as most everyone else. For my money, Moore's best work is Supreme, Miracleman, and Tom Strong.
I know, but the general idea of "getting nasty" with attacks is.... usually not that.
Entertainment, intellectual challenge, and fun?
But that's not what I'm getting at. Of course stories can change us. But the difference I'm getting at is there is a difference between "I am going to try and use a fictional scenerio to explore if there is a philosophical truth to discover and you can decide how your affected with the results" and "I'm here to control your brain as much as I can!!!"
One is art, the other feels close to a sort of quasipropaganda
I like Watchmen fine but I've never been as high as on it as most everyone else. For my money, Moore's best work is Supreme, Miracleman, and Tom Strong.
Moore and Morrison are peas in a pod even if they take shots back and forth and give each other the cold shoulder. Both of them can be incredibly insightful and highbrow while also putting out stomach turning nastiness. If anything they probably don't care for one another because of how much they step on one another's toes.
I somewhat agree with the criticism, although that doesnt sink the work for me. It's more a flaw with the vision as a whole than the execution.
Now give up more dirt on Mr. Millar. That's what I really wanna see.
I like Watchmen fine but I've never been as high as on it as most everyone else. For my money, Moore's best work is Supreme, Miracleman, and Tom Strong.
I read recently that Millar was Morrison's protege and I couldn't believe it. I would love to hear some of his honest thoughts on Millar's work.
lolIm pretty sure morrison said that he hopes to run into millar in glasgow "preferably while im driving 100 mph when it happens" or something like that lmao
"I wish him well but there's not good feeling between myself and Mark for many reasons most of which are he destroyed my faith in human fucking nature."
Supreme and Tom Strong are both superb comics. I need to read the rest of his ABC stuff.
This Supreme love is great to see! It's always been one of my favorite all-time comic runs but I feel like most have no idea what I'm referring to whenever I'd brought it up in the past, haha. It is a shame that it never got a proper conclusion...I think Moore's final scripts did end up getting drawn and published eventually, but I've never gone back to check them, doesn't seem like it would feel the same.Agree. Moore's Supreme run is still the best Superman run there never was.
IIRC, they worked together earlier in Millar's career -- they co-write a brief Flash run together and Morrison gave him the idea for Red Son's ending (unsurprisingly, the best part of that book wasn't even Millar's).I read recently that Millar was Morrison's protege and I couldn't believe it. I would love to hear some of his honest thoughts on Millar's work.
He wrote Holy Terror. I don't think nothing more needs to be said.
This Supreme love is great to see! It's always been one of my favorite all-time comic runs but I feel like most have no idea what I'm referring to whenever I'd brought it up in the past, haha. It is a shame that it never got a proper conclusion...I think Moore's final scripts did end up getting drawn and published eventually, but I've never gone back to check them, doesn't seem like it would feel the same.
As for the other ABC stuff, a lot of people love Promethea and Top 10. I didn't. :lol But I did like some of the Tomorrow Stories stuff.
More people associate Supreme with Liefeld than with Moore: you tend to get a different reaction from those folks- lol
Personally, I loved Top 10. As weird as they were, those characters just came alive for me. The genre mash-up that composed the city also had, for me, a great Futurama-as-police-procedural feel.
Promethea didn't grab me. But I was reading it in digital form on my tablet, and I've heard that the visuals really need to be seen in a large format, like the Absolute edition. I may look into the Deluxe edition coming out next year.
Moore is so much more (haha) than Watchmen. It was Miracleman that really made me hunt down his other work. The stuff he did with DC- particularly his Green Lantern work and things like "Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?" is really top-notch. And that Swamp Thing run is still super readable.
Bryne seems like the type of dude where even Santa Claus has a " This motherfucker" story about himIve never heard of claremont ripping on anybody, which is amazing considering the amount of shit John Byrne talks about him.
Yeah, and Moore never gets on the page of his comics yelling "Look at me! Look at me!", but you were asking about how art saying something is bad. It isn't, but, nevertheless, art that feels like it has a message it wants to shove down your throat is frustrating to read. I get that more from Morrisons work than I ever did with Moore.
Hahahaha, imagine the balls to write Animal Man and then call out another writer for drawing attention to themselves and acting "clever." I like Grant Morrison's work but come the fuck on.In my school, I was taught in this Scottish Presbyterian way that structure is hidden: you don't see the writer's mechanics. Watchmen, you can't turn the page without him saying "Look at me, look at me, look at me." Okay, we get it, man. You got thrown out of school at 16 for dealing acid, you're clever.
man, Promethea is such a weird thing of its own that I don't understand any overlap between liking it and other ABC comics.As for the other ABC stuff, a lot of people love Promethea and Top 10. I didn't. :lol But I did like some of the Tomorrow Stories stuff.
Hahahaha, imagine the balls to write Animal Man and then call out another writer for drawing attention to themselves and acting "clever." I like Grant Morrison's work but come the fuck on.
No
Final Crisis was literally a middle finger to Moore's style of storytelling.Morrison's needs to get over his obsession with Moore already. When he's still writing stuff like Pax Americana that reads like it's meant to be a big "fuck you" to Moore, it's clear Morrison has yet to get over it as much as he claims he has.
I love how fucking obscure and high-brow his version of getting nastier is.
Well, it's been a while since I read it, but a lot of it comes down to personality type from what I remember. The psychiatrist was a positive man who wanted the best for the world. However, he developed that into a sort of fake-friendly personality because it was useful to his career both in terms of PR and having his patients open up to him. The psychiatrist was nevertheless largely concerned with being the one to cure Rorschoch. It wasn't that that desire was inauthentic so much as it was mired by his desire for fame and glory.
So, Rorschoch's story just forced him to reassess. What was truly important to him? What did he truly want to live for? What change did he want to see in the world? Rorschoch's story affected him because it broke down the barriers of the fakeness and forced him to find TRUE meaning. And there isn't necessarily anything that about his backstory that has to MAKE him do this. He followed a different path than Rorschoch because he is a different person, whose lead a different life on thousands of different points and has different goals in life. The psychiatist was probably not bullied the way Rorschoch was, he didn't have a mother the way Rorshoch did, he didn't formulate his way of helping people by beating up others. So, having a thing that divides him from Rorschoch isn't a particularly important aspect to me, because it's really a thousands different things. They're just different people.
What is important is the result in this case is that nihilism isn't an depicted as an inevitability. Rorschoch stared into the void of darkness and decided to lose all sense of self. The Psychiatrist reconstructed himself. The nihilistic part that 'broke' them that Morrison is referring to is, I think, the idea that the void is real. That there is no inherent meaning and both Rorshoch and the Psychiatrist (atleast for a time) accept that as true, and maybe that's what he refers to. But in lieu of meaning, the Psychiatrist decided to make his own, and that itself is a meaningful defiance of the void.
But one other thing I want to address
This is what bothers me the most, I think. That Morrison views storytelling as an inherent tool to shape and manipulate us. And whenever he pulls that shit on me in his own writing, it drives me up the wall. It shouldn't matter whether I became more altruistic or if any other reader did, because the story is being told to the psychiatrist and we're just observing. If anything, the idea that an author is trying to directly change my mindframe comes off as gross to me. I HATE storytelling that specifically tries to make me think a certain way.
I'm not saying that stories shouldn't affect us, but I feel that should be a byproduct of the story being good. For the purposes of telling a story, it doesn't matter how Rorschoch's story affected me, but how it affected the person he's telling it to, which is the psychiatrist, and we see that he becomes more altruistic, which I interpret as meaning that Rorschoch's nihilism isn't the inevitable endpoint, that we always make our own meaning afterwards. But I don't feel that the story is "making" me think that so much as the author is saying how things happened and I'm extrapolating my own meaning from it. I like that. It presets Rorschoch's narrative, and it's convincing, it's pursuasive, but there are clear faultlines that appear as the story goes on, including Rorschoch himself breaking down over the awfulness of Veidt's plan.
But it's entirely up to you to decide how far along the Rorschoch Rabbit hole you want to go.
"There's a tension between us based on past history, but not… what you say isn't necessarily true, I don't want to say bad things about people like Mark and anyone but yes Kick Ass was made, Wanted was made, there are no other films any more made than say Joe The Barbarian and We3 which are all in the same state of production with directors attached, with screenplays…I read recently that Millar was Morrison's protege and I couldn't believe it. I would love to hear some of his honest thoughts on Millar's work.
amazing
Bradford Wright described Watchmen as "Moore's obituary for the concept of heroes in general and superheroes in particular."[32] Putting the story in a contemporary sociological context, Wright wrote that the characters of Watchmen were Moore's "admonition to those who trusted in 'heroes' and leaders to guard the world's fate". He added that to place faith in such icons was to give up personal responsibility to "the Reagans, Thatchers, and other 'Watchmen' of the world who supposed to 'rescue' us and perhaps lay waste to the planet in the process".[52]
A statement that could ultimately serve as the engraving for humanity's headstone.
I've read waaaay too much 2000AD and Vertigo books to pick a side.
Still don't like Watchmen. At all.