I'd be surprised if this reaches 3 pagesgot a feeling this thread will have less posts than the one jumping to conclusions
The original tweets from Nintendo Japan never mentioned not giving refunds. The source for the story, nintendosoup, mistranslated/lied for clicks.
The original tweets from Nintendo Japan never mentioned not giving refunds. The source for the story, nintendosoup, mistranslated/lied for clicks.
The original tweets from Nintendo Japan never mentioned not giving refunds. The source for the story, nintendosoup, mistranslated/lied for clicks.
There shouldn't even be two versions of the expansion pass you can buy. There should be one pass that automatically detects which version of the game you have and distributes the version-exclusive content accordingly.
The original tweets from Nintendo Japan never mentioned not giving refunds. The source for the story, nintendosoup, mistranslated/lied for clicks.
Hmm
Good thing Nintendo is doing this.
I do think it's ridiculous that they split the dlc for Sword and Shield into two different versions, versus having one expansion that works regardless of which version of Pokémon you bought.
It just screams greed.
Outside of exclusive Pokémon, is the expansion pass for Sword the same as Shield? They're both getting isle of armor and the second right?
Then it works for both.
No, there was a reddit post about this 2 days ago and they already were getting refunds back then.
naturallygot a feeling this thread will have less posts than the one jumping to conclusions
The backlash based on incorrect information and jumping to conclusions?
This actually makes a lot of people who defended Nintendo in that other thread look like idiots.
But then people who bought both versions of the game would only have to buy the expansion pass once instead of twice!There shouldn't even be two versions of the expansion pass you can buy. There should be one pass that automatically detects which version of the game you have and distributes the version-exclusive content accordingly.
Who was defeneding them? Entire thread was calling them out for it before it was found out the source lied about no refunds since they mistranslated it for clicks.This actually makes a lot of people who defended Nintendo in that other thread look like idiots.
You'd have to pony up $60 instead of just $30 to access the DLC in both situations. Pretty shitty if you ask me, but oh well, the first page in this thread is quite something too, but hey, at least this is a happy ending in some way!
There was a lot of victim blaming and back n forth about how easy it is to not buy wrong DLC and why its not Nintendo's fault that you bought the wrong DLC.Just out of curiosity how were people defending them not offering refunds?
name those peopleThis actually makes a lot of people who defended Nintendo in that other thread look like idiots.
it shouldn't have taken this long to clarify it, and no reason for it to be two passes reallyThe backlash based on incorrect information and jumping to conclusions?
Hey, you want to take credit for that, be my guest.
That I can agree withit shouldn't have taken this long to clarify it, and no reason for it to be two passes really