I'm gonna go ahead and guess that most of the people being hysterical had no intention of getting the game anyway.
I would bet a lot of money that you are bang on with that assessment.
Transparent is a word that is not used enough on this forum
I'm gonna go ahead and guess that most of the people being hysterical had no intention of getting the game anyway.
I prefer reach multi to 4. I also have a soft spot for the reach campaignReach was by far the worst Halo game. It's not even a competition. Everything was bad in Reach.
4 and 5 weren't great, but at least they mailed the core gameplay loop that makes Halo so enjoyable. Reach couldn't even do that.
Great to see gamers reacting to curious news with the usual hyperbole and hysteria.
I'm gonna go ahead and guess that most of the people being hysterical had no intention of getting the game anyway.
Copied from the duplicate thread:
It's not a safe assumption that it's a sign of issues. Turnover happens every single week at large companies. Admittedly it's less common with Directors, but even so the change could be for any number of reasons.
While it's neat to appreciate the individuals working on games, I wouldn't be able to draw anything meaningful from this information.
Reach was by far the worst Halo game. It's not even a competition. Everything was bad in Reach.
4 and 5 weren't great, but at least they mailed the core gameplay loop that makes Halo so enjoyable. Reach couldn't even do that.
Or the fact that they know he posts here alot and probaby asked him not comment on it. He doesn't owe us any answers.
one thing you can definitely count on is people creating countless paper tigers and operating with endless hyperbole.I would bet a lot of money that you are bang on with that assessment.
Transparent is a word that is not used enough on this forum
like this.
Not true.There's definitely something bad happening behind the scenes if they need to change director this late
They are not rebooting game development, let alone none of the 343i's Halo games have been rebooted development wise.Wow third straight 343 Halo game where is sounds like they are rebooting the game towards the end of development again. My hype is now deflated
one thing you can definitely count on is people creating countless paper tigers and operating with endless hyperbole.
Framing a relaxed conversation about the potential implications of this story as "hysteria" and that people finding the news potentially interesting as "transparent", for example.
like this.
who is this poster even talking to? lol
this was beautiful quinton just wanted to let you know
i don't really see this not launching with the next xbox. having a halo launch game is a pretty clutch move, and could move some serious units.I wonder if it will still launch with the system. I haven't been a fan of the last two Halo games so to me this could be a great thing.
Butchered the story from the book.
Noble team dies transporting Cortana because she's retconned into being 'the key' to winning the war, despite doing nothing of the sort in the following games.
Master Chief sleeps throughout one of the most pivotal parts of the saga when he should've been active.
The very end last stand part is alright though.
Butchered the story from the book.
Noble team dies transporting Cortana because she's retconned into being 'the key' to winning the war, despite doing nothing of the sort in the following games.
Master Chief sleeps throughout one of the most pivotal parts of the saga when he should've been active.
The very end last stand part is alright though.
Admittedly I haven't read every single post but I don't see anyone acting hysterical over this. Maybe you guys could link a handful of the posts to which you are referring?
one thing you can definitely count on is people creating countless paper tigers and operating with endless hyperbole.
Framing a relaxed conversation about the potential implications of this story as "hysteria" and that people finding the news potentially interesting as "transparent", for example.
like this.
who is this poster even talking to? lol
Wow third straight 343 Halo game where is sounds like they are rebooting the game towards the end of development again. My hype is now deflated
If the director found a different job he was excited about and decided the final stages of infinite's development would be fine without him, why should he spend another year on it if he has a new opportunity he is interested in? There are millions of reasons for why someone may decide to leave a company
Okay, so part of my last paragraph is no longer valid. But the rest still stands. This will not have an effect on the overarching game systems already in place.
could this be related? Maybe MS wanted a bigger focus on live service elements.
My issue with Reach's campaign was the level design. None of the missions were memorable (and ive played through the game probably 10 times). But when i think of Halo 3- The Ark, The Covenant, Halo. Man there are some memorable levels and gameplay segments. The scarab fights (we never got to fight one proper in Reach), and that last warthog run were so fun to re-do with friends over and over. Nothing in Reach had that memorability or replayability to me in the same way.
My issue with Reach's campaign was the level design. None of the missions were memorable (and ive played through the game probably 10 times). But when i think of Halo 3- The Ark, The Covenant, Halo. Man there are some memorable levels and gameplay segments. The scarab fights (we never got to fight one proper in Reach), and that last warthog run were so fun to re-do with friends over and over. Nothing in Reach had that memorability or replayability to me in the same way.
How can anyone on here possibly answer that? Besides, he would have left before 5 launched due to reqs no??
could this be related? Maybe MS wanted a bigger focus on live service elements.
Reach was by far the worst Halo game. It's not even a competition. Everything was bad in Reach.
4 and 5 weren't great, but at least they mailed the core gameplay loop that makes Halo so enjoyable. Reach couldn't even do that.
Sorry, but Reach was the last good Halo campaign, everything after has been mediocre.
The gunplay in Reach was on the same level as Halo 3
Really? I thought Halo 4 had a great campaign. Sans the crummy final fight (generally no Halo game has been good with this lol) the set pieces and level design was great. Prometheans are dumb thoSorry, but Reach was the last good Halo campaign, everything after has been mediocre.
The gunplay in Reach was on the same level as Halo 3
Really? I thought Halo 4 had a great campaign. Sans the crummy final fight (generally no Halo game has been good with this lol) the set pieces and level design was great. Prometheans are dumb tho
What does that have to do with Halo 3's shitty gunplay compared to the rest of the franchise?
I didn't say Halo 3's gunplay was shit? I said Reach's gunplay was on par with it, if your using your own opinion to twist it...then sure..go ahead
I love halo 3 but this is 110% correct!Halo 3 has the most random and inconsistent gunplay in the series due to poor design decisions, that is a fact.
Halo 3 has the most random and inconsistent gunplay in the series due to poor design decisions, that is a fact.
Oh if he worked on Halo 5 it's definitely a good thing. If you had told me before Halo 5 launched that there would ever be a Halo game that I don't finish, I'd of called you crazy.Well if he worked on Halo 5's campaign maybe this is a good thing? It's hard to spin someone leaving this late in development as a good thing though.
Also, I don't think this game has any excuses when it comes to it's time in development. It would have been 5 years since Halo 5 next year.