Except you said
Straight from Xbox One X. No edits, only photo mode for framingHellblade is a very nice looking game with great audio design, animation and visuals but it isnt a top 10 this gen graphically. There am were just better examples of graphical prowess that clearly had more resources as well. I don't mean this as an insult to NT in any way. They punched above their weight.
GODDAMN!!!
That looks incredible. I'm kinda worried about where a sequel could go, but fuck, that trailer is hype as hell.
Ninja Theory is Microsoft's crown jewel. This will be the game of the gen.
Except you said
Straight from Xbox One X. No edits, only photo mode for framing
You're gonna be hard pressed to find many games that look better and are currently released so I'll let Senua express how I feel about your claim:
It was in engine that says absolutely nothing about the resolution of the game. For all we know it was running at 8K downsampled to 4K.
The Xbox Series Z version.
Ok if you are lazy to watch the Dante's Inferno trailer or downlaod the 8K screen, here I cropped the detail for you and pointed it with arrows.
Dante's Inferno:
Hellblade 2 8K screenshot:
I would have never imagined to see such details in games this soon. And Hellblade 2 has better quality than Dante's Inferno CGI in many areas.
Doesn't take next gen for peach fuzz.
So what is your defense of Street fighter V? Everything that was announced for multiple platforms before has been made available on those platforms. I get the feeling it's because MS is involved more than anything.I wonder if the stance would be the same, if tables were turned around? It's beyond me why people defend a sequel to a multiplatform game, that was already in the roadmap before the acquisition, being turned into an exclusive to a single ecosystem.
So what is your defense of Street fighter V? Everything that was announced for multiple platforms before has been made available on those platforms. I get the feeling it's because MS is involved more than anything.
It's different circumstances than a traditional 3P moneyhat. Ninja Theory is now a MS owned studio and the game is funded completely by MS. And the HB2 they are currently making isn't the same one they would be making if they had to find the funds independently.That attempt to retort was already made and replied over a week ago:
That feeling is all on you. Wouldn't you be annoyed, if RE2 remake had been turned into an exclusive, and people were championing it?
That response is such a non response though. It's just saying it sucks but this now first party studio making a game exclusive is much worse than an iconic 3rd party moneyhat.That attempt to retort was already made and replied over a week ago:
That feeling is all on you. Wouldn't you be annoyed, if RE2 remake had been turned into an exclusive, and people were championing it?
That response is such a non response though. It's just saying it sucks but this now first party studio making a game exclusive is much worse than an iconic 3rd party moneyhat.
No I am not "championing" it but it is a first party studio. 1st parties make exclusives. It just sounds like moving goal posts.
It's different circumstances than a traditional 3P moneyhat. Ninja Theory is now a MS owned studio and the game is funded completely by MS. And the HB2 they are currently making isn't the same one they would be making if they had to find the funds independently.
Microsoft is buying studios to make their first party offering more enticing.I get the feeling you're not satisfied with the response that didn't match your expectations. It's a fitting response for an unrelated issue, since I've never championed the SFV exclusivity deal, and none of Microsoft's competitors have so far acquired studios which have released most of their games on multiple platforms. I haven't posted any grievances about the SFV deal either though, since it doesn't really affect me as I don't play fighting games. The same would apply, if some sports game became exclusive to XB platform. I don't play them either, so it's not like I'd be missing anything. Other examples would be Rise of the Tomb Raider and Plants Vs. Zombies Garden Warfare. The latter timed exclusivity deal didn't bother me anywhere near as much, since it wasn't a game I would have bought anyway, and it didn't have such a history on other platforms. On top of that, I don't have any issues with MS acquiring studios like Playground, which have a long history with them.
How exactly are the goal posts moved, when this was already discussed over a week ago? You come late to the debate, which had already run its course, and try to turn it into something it's not.
People were championing for the acquisition of a studio with a long history of supporting multiple platforms, and are still doing so in the related threads, like the most recent one about a visit to Poland, and the rumor about a possible Asian acquisition. Wet dreams about CD Project Red and From Software can be found in abundance on those threads.
That being said, if the Hellblade sequel turns out to be an open world game, like the trailer seems to imply, it's not a big loss for me, since I've grown a strong distaste for the formula. That's why I have only bought a couple of AAA games during the past two years.
EDIT:
Yes, it's worse, as the usual moneyhat deals only delay when everyone can play the games, or only affect a single game, not every game the studio makes. In this case, no-one can play the game, that was already in the works before the acquisition, outside of Microsoft's eco system. Let alone, that if it turns out that the increased budget made them change it into yet another open world game, it would have been better as a mid-budget good old linear experience, like the first.
And I never championed MS buying CD project Red. It isn't that I didn't get the answer I wanted. It's just a ridiculous double standard. If that's the position you are going to take I expect a lot of grumbling about Ori, psychonauts, wasteland, senua, Outer Worlds, pillars of eternity...I get the feeling you're not satisfied with the response that didn't match your expectations. It's a fitting response for an unrelated issue, since I've never championed the SFV exclusivity deal, and none of Microsoft's competitors have so far acquired studios which have released most of their games on multiple platforms. I haven't posted any grievances about the SFV deal either though, since it doesn't really affect me as I don't play fighting games. The same would apply, if some sports game became exclusive to XB platform. I don't play them either, so it's not like I'd be missing anything. Other examples would be Rise of the Tomb Raider and Plants Vs. Zombies Garden Warfare. The latter timed exclusivity deal didn't bother me anywhere near as much, since it wasn't a game I would have bought anyway, and it didn't have such a history on other platforms. On top of that, I don't have any issues with MS acquiring studios like Playground, which have a long history with them.
How exactly are the goal posts moved, when this was already discussed over a week ago? You come late to the debate, which had already run its course, and try to turn it into something it's not.
People were championing for the acquisition of a studio with a long history of supporting multiple platforms, and are still doing so in the related threads, like the most recent one about a visit to Poland, and the rumor about a possible Asian acquisition. Wet dreams about CD Project Red and From Software can be found in abundance on those threads.
That being said, if the Hellblade sequel turns out to be an open world game, like the trailer seems to imply, it's not a big loss for me, since I've grown a strong distaste for the formula. That's why I have only bought a couple of AAA games during the past two years.
EDIT:
Yes, it's worse, as the usual moneyhat deals only delay when everyone can play the games, or only affect a single game, not every game the studio makes. In this case, no-one can play the game, that was already in the works before the acquisition, outside of Microsoft's eco system. Let alone, that if it turns out that the increased budget made them change it into yet another open world game, it would have been better as a mid-budget good old linear experience, like the first.
Even the claim that successful studios should not be bought is similarly dumbfounding. It is something that is staple in the gaming business.And I never championed MS buying CD project Red. It isn't that I didn't get the answer I wanted. It's just a ridiculous double standard. If that's the position you are going to take I expect a lot of grumbling about Ori, psychonauts, wasteland, senua, Outer Worlds, pillars of eternity...
Is your problem that they are making sequels to IP's they own exclusive or that people are championing for them to buy otherwise healthy studios? It comes across as they shouldn't make newly acquired IP's exclusive which is dumbfounding.
This too. The idea that all those games I listed earlier should be off the table because they appeared on other platforms is laughable. If Sony makes a sequel to Sunset Overdrive I'm not going to complain that they are "taking it away" Insomniac is a first party studio and that is now a Sony IP. It is how first party works.Even the claim that successful studios should not be bought is similarly dumbfounding. It is something that is staple in the gaming business.
You cannot simply go around gobbling depressed assets alone; eventually, you want to have some really good studios similarly headlining your purchases. Sony bought Insomniac, and it is something that elevates their first party holding, and it is OK.
It is gamers looking at business through a very narrow lens of 'business must work in such a way that favors my tastes.' Businesses exist to make money. No one is investing in a first party studio to make sure that they are making games on another system.....unless you have something as huge as Minecraft.This too. The idea that all those games I listed earlier should be off the table because they appeared on other platforms is laughable. If Sony makes a sequel to Sunset Overdrive I'm not going to complain that they are "taking it away" Insomniac is a first party studio and that is now a Sony IP. It is how first party works.
If Sony makes a sequel to Sunset Overdrive id be pretty happy because I dont expect it at all.This too. The idea that all those games I listed earlier should be off the table because they appeared on other platforms is laughable. If Sony makes a sequel to Sunset Overdrive I'm not going to complain that they are "taking it away" Insomniac is a first party studio and that is now a Sony IP. It is how first party works.
Sorry for the bump, but someone was playing this at work and I noticed the three dots on the bottom-right with two being lit up (in the beginning of the video). Has there been any conversation about this and what it could mean, i.e., three games in development and Hellblade 2 is the second formally announced?
The three dots represent the three projects focusing on mental health at Ninja Theory.
- The Insight Project (not a game) - https://games.mxdwn.com/news/hellbl...-project-focusing-on-mental-health-treatment/
- Hellblade 2
- Project Mara - https://games.mxdwn.com/news/ninja-...itle-project-mara-will-explore-mental-terror/
Doesn't take next gen for peach fuzz.
Sorry for the bump, but someone was playing this at work and I noticed the three dots on the bottom-right with two being lit up (in the beginning of the video). Has there been any conversation about this and what it could mean, i.e., three games in development and Hellblade 2 is the second formally announced?
You are joking right?Well thanks a lot now all I can see is that Aerith has a hairy nose.