hmqgg: It was me, not AMD who pulled the GitHub leak

Status
Not open for further replies.
OP
OP
III-V

III-V

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,999
Obviously not fake, but how can you pull it if it wasn't your repo. And why make this claim at all?
 

Betelgeuse

Member
Nov 2, 2017
1,794
Uh...is there any way to see who took it down?

Difficult for me to give this the benefit of the doubt anyway, given hmqgg flubbed (1) XSX being RDNA1 and (2) XSX and PS5's SSD secret sauce both being GPU decompression.
 

Caiusto

Member
Oct 25, 2017
470
He's Bill Gates and that's the real reason behind GitHub acquisition by Microsoft.
 
Oct 26, 2017
9,662
Yeah... I don't get this thread.

Who is this person, and what Github leak? Not sure what this has to do with gaming. A lot of context is missing.
I was wondering the same thing. A little context in OP would be dynamite.

Next time OP, try putting context in your post. Like, any context at all.

After some Googling I found this, which I think explains some of this:
https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2019-playstation-5-xbox-series-x-spec-leak-analysed
Thank you
 

Toumari

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,583
England

OG_Thrills

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,333
So this is a fake leaker/insider, emerging from a literal sea of fake/insiders claiming responsibility for his fake leak?
 

TsuWave

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,139
This is being presented as something significant, but I don’t know what any of it means
 

hmqgg

Member
Nov 1, 2017
219
Lol. My twitter account is locked and once I said don't share anything from my Twitter account, right?
 

Regret

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,664
NYC
The OP makes no sense. Is anyone reading through the second screenshot?

He's saying the Github leak was proven (we already know this), and he took down the post to find the moles... what moles? And it's a happy ending because they were found and he is "lol all the time." Is he drunk?
 
OP
OP
III-V

III-V

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,999
Ah thanks, there's some context.

So OP is claiming that this leak was a doctored fake, yet Digital Foundry is claiming it's real? Doesn't that tarnish their credibility if true?

No he is claiming that it is real as well. Just that he somehow had the ability to control the repo? Did he create a fake repo with these docs? Now we don't know where they came from. Thats what I am wondering.

So this is a fake leaker/insider, emerging from a literal sea of fake/insiders claiming responsibility for his fake leak?
Not at all!
 

Legacy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,795
I don't know what any of this or this is about but who is this hmqgg and why should I care?
 

doncabesa

Banned
Jun 27, 2018
1,122
No he is claiming that it is real as well. Just that he somehow had the ability to control the repo? Did he create a fake repo with these docs? Now we don't know where they came from. Thats what I am wondering.



Not at all!
Nice of you to post something from his twitter feed after he had explicitly asked to not do that.
 

Lant_War

The Fallen
Jul 14, 2018
12,679
The OP makes no sense. Is anyone reading through the second screenshot?

He's saying the Github leak was proven (we already know this), and he took down the post to find the moles... what moles? And it's a happy ending because they were found and he is "lol all the time." Is he drunk?
You don't get it, discord servers are serious business.
 
OP
OP
III-V

III-V

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,999

M.Bluth

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,032
He said the XSX was RDNA1 and was adamant about it.

That's what they call a liar. No one should give him any attention anymore.
 

hmqgg

Member
Nov 1, 2017
219
Well I don't see all of this? If you want the thread locked I will report it as a curtesy. Otherwise I would like to discuss.


As I said I never saw any of that.
Please do it.

That was my pinned twitter when I locked my account, I just didn't know when it disappeared. But if you didn't read that, okay.
 

Coda

Member
Nov 17, 2019
655
Pretty sure he is saying he DMCA'd the repository somehow. No idea how he did it, probably social engineering or some shit.
 

hmqgg

Member
Nov 1, 2017
219
He said the XSX was RDNA1 and was adamant about it.

That's what they call a liar. No one should give him any attention anymore.
Lol, some ppl just read part of my tweets and ignored the reply that I said it has RDNA2 features but I doubted the efficiency due to process node. And it wasn't even announced at that time.
 

M.Bluth

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,032
Lol, some ppl just read part of my tweets and ignored the reply that I said it has RDNA2 features but I doubted the efficiency due to process node. And it wasn't even announced at that time.
Someone asked you if you believed it was still RDNA1 and you answered "Yes."
So, nah.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.