This is great! Horizon has one of the absolute best stories in games, and in science fiction in general. It has a great cast of characters (Aloy, Sylens, Erend, and Rost stand out), an amazing premise and backstory, and excellent writing.
Oh, uh thanks for the warning but I mean what I said.As a reminder : It is okay to disagree with the award decision. Take your time to draft your arguments rather than writing something provocative and bail out.
Like, I just really don’t agree with this. Horizon is a really good game and I enjoy it, but it strengths were not in the script, character development, or overall story.Horizon definently had the best story, characters, writing, and world of any game released last year, bar none. It's not even a contest.
It's one of the greatest of all time up there with Red Dead Redemption, Fallout New Vegas, Bioshock, etc.
The lore is part of the overall package. I agree that the narrative presentation was lacking in a lot of ways but the content of the story/lore was outstanding. It vastly exceeded my expectations.Like, I just really don’t agree with this. Horizon is a really good game and I enjoy it, but it strengths were not in the script, character development, or overall story.
The lore and visual logs were so much better than the present day stuff. There was such a huge discrepancy in quality between these two aspects of the game that I can’t praise it overall.
Oh I don’t disagree with the quality of the lore. The logs and backstory were very well done and big reasons why I like the game. But like you said it’s part of an overall package which the other part is not very good. The development of present day characters is inconsistent, the side quest writing is poor, and the main plot is poor as well as the main character. Big deductions.The lore is part of the overall package. I agree that the narrative presentation was lacking in a lot of ways but the content of the story/lore was outstanding. It vastly exceeded my expectations.
The WGA doesn't play the games, they evaluate the writing based on the scripts submitted to them. If a developer doesn't submit a script they're not a contender.
Did not know this, now things make sense to me, most of the problems I had were based off of quest design which probably isn't really evaluated if just going off a script I suppose.The WGA doesn't play the games, they evaluate the writing based on the scripts submitted to them. If developer doesn't submit a script they're not a contender.
Considering you had to be a paid member of the organization to be nominated, is it now Horizon Paid Awards? At least it makes more sense now, would have been absolutely laughable otherwise. The games with better writing are either Japanese and don’t care about stuff like this small western developers like those behind Edith Finch or Divinity.
I’m dying.Keep in mind Rise of the Tomb Raider won 2015. Not exactly a prestigious award.
Ahahah you made it worth it.
Nier's story wasn't much to write home about. I think it has excellent characterization but I don't believe it's story is as marvelous as it's made out to be. Horizon had 2 central mysteries, possibly 3 that kept the story engrossing and made you want to seek answers to those mysteries. It should have been a nominee but I wouldn't consider it as a contender for winning.....Madden was a nominee for best writing?
In fact, what is with the nominations? Wheres Nier Automata?
I mean I liked Horizon but it's story wasn't anything to write home about.
It's not just Japanese or "small Western" developers; even a studio like BioWare never bothered to submit anything because the rules just don't really apply to most games.Considering you had to be a paid member of the organization to be nominated, is it now Horizon Paid Awards? At least it makes more sense now, would have been absolutely laughable otherwise. The games with better writing are either Japanese and don’t care about stuff like this small western developers like those behind Edith Finch or Divinity.
Damn, is this how you really view people?While Horizon is a totally enjoyable experience, I still find it to be a totally average game that was given a lot of praise thanks to Sony's marketing machine really cranking the shit out of the hype train. I've compared it before to a really cute guy you meet in a bar who impresses your friends and acts real smart, but turns out to be a totally plain and average person in the end. Nice to be around, but unremarkable on closer inspection. At least your parents will be impressed when you take him home.
Pretty sure they both won. Which basically says everything there is to say about this award.Wait, which Tomb Raider was that? The 2013 reboot or Rise?
Both were mediocre in this regard TBF but I'm curious which one it was.
I'm no mod but your initial post simply insulted everything in like four words. It was the definition of a drive by post, you didn't explain yourself, add any depth or anything to the conversation. You may well have meant what you said but it simply doesn't add to the conversation. This follow up post expanding on why you don't agree and what games you thought were better should have been what your first post was like to avoid the issue as it does add to the conversation and add possible spring boards for further discussion.Oh, uh thanks for the warning but I mean what I said.
Could you honestly look at what Horizon was competing against and tell me with a straight face the standards were some high bar worth conquering?
Pretty low standards if you ask me. Maybe I do not understand what makes a "drive-by" post, somehow it is only an issue when the connotation is negative? Yet, 1-3 word posts which amount to little more than blind approval and serve no purpose to further conversation do not count as drive-by?
To expand, I don't think Horizon had good writing because it does little to innovate on the "rogue AI gone bad" trope, and as others have said there is very little character development overall. Furthermore, were it forced to compete with last years actual heavy hitters like say Automata, Hellblade, LiS: BtS, Horizon would fall flat right quick.
Is there a way to dispute moderation tickets? You are forced to click "I understand" to do literally anything afterwards, but in-fact I do not understand the warning at all. What about my statement was wrong? Somebody point out to me the high-standards of writing among these highly suspect and limited (by a guild) choices. As far as "bailing out" goes, I was quoted once and it was an agreement no less. Had somebody quoted my post to demand explanation they would have had it.
Looking at many other posts in this thread, I am very confused about the notion or meaning of "drive-by" post. Right above this post is the same sentiment even...
I was with you right up until you suggested that Breath of the Wild was a heavy hitter in terms of story telling. While I certainly think an argument could be made that Zelda has a better story than Horizon but I feel like the stories in both of those games are rough. The story of Zelda has a fantastic premise to build off of but it completely fumbles it by having mostly not great VO and the writing just doesn't go in any interesting directions. Thankfully, the story is pretty easy to ignore.Could you honestly look at what Horizon was competing against and tell me with a straight face the standards were some high bar worth conquering?
Pretty low standards if you ask me.
To expand, I don't think Horizon had good writing because it does little to innovate on the "rogue AI gone bad" trope, and as others have said there is very little character development overall. Furthermore, were it forced to compete with last years actual heavy hitters like say Automata, Hellblade, LiS: BtS, Horizon would fall flat right quick.
Er, I have to sleep now but I didn't mention BotW. My apologies for not spelling it out, but LiS: BtS = Life Is Strange: Before the Storm lol. The other two I mention were Hellblade and NieR: Automata.I was with you right up until you suggested that Breath of the Wild was a heavy hitter in terms of story telling. While I certainly think an argument could be made that Zelda has a better story than Horizon but I feel like the stories in both of these games was rough. The story of Zelda has a fantastic premise to build off of but it completely fumbles it by having mostly not great VO and the writing just doesn't go in any interesting directions. Thankfully, the story is pretty easy to ignore.
With that in mind, I would say Horizon's writing is a bit better mostly because the story of what happened in the past and all the sci fi stuff around that is great but all of the storytelling/writing around the tribes and those characters is just bad. It's bad and uninteresting. Nier:Automata, Wolfenstein, What Remains of Edith Finch and Night in the Woods are easily the best stories of last year. Nier and Wolfenstein are only worth playing because of their stories. Finch doesn't stick the landing and Night in the Woods story doesn't go in direction that I love but overall the writing is so good in the both of those.
Weird criteria for good writing.To expand, I don't think Horizon had good writing because it does little to innovate on the "rogue AI gone bad" trope
There's no way to dispute it that I know of, and I don't think most mods put any effort into responding to PM questions about warnings and bans, at least in my experience.Oh, uh thanks for the warning but I mean what I said.
Could you honestly look at what Horizon was competing against and tell me with a straight face the standards were some high bar worth conquering?
Pretty low standards if you ask me. Maybe I do not understand what makes a "drive-by" post, somehow it is only an issue when the connotation is negative? Yet, 1-3 word posts which amount to little more than blind approval and serve no purpose to further conversation do not count as drive-by?
To expand, I don't think Horizon had good writing because it does little to innovate on the "rogue AI gone bad" trope, and as others have said there is very little character development overall. Furthermore, were it forced to compete with last years actual heavy hitters like say Automata, Hellblade, LiS: BtS, Horizon would fall flat right quick.
Is there a way to dispute moderation tickets? You are forced to click "I understand" to do literally anything afterwards, but in-fact I do not understand the warning at all. What about my statement was wrong? Somebody point out to me the high-standards of writing among these highly suspect and limited (by a guild) choices. As far as "bailing out" goes, I was quoted once and it was an agreement no less. Had somebody quoted my post to demand explanation they would have had it.
Looking at many other posts in this thread, I am very confused about the notion or meaning of "drive-by" post. Right above this post is the same sentiment even...
Madden's story mode....while being a little hamfisted, is WORLDS better than most video game writing. It's a decent little story. FIFA too.Awesome news, but uh... what's up with that shortlist? Madden?