There is a wire-crossing here where the good faith liberals desire to extend to accusations of offense by marginalized groups is being exploited for what are very obviously innocuous and true things Omar has said. Like, have we gotten to the point where we cannot just discern when something is bullshit, where everything has to be a big dialogue where people snap at points they agree with for whatever absurd reason?
This is a good point. And clearly, a lot of what's being aimed at Omar is bullshit.
Taking on a purely academic view, I just find myself looking at Omar and thinking "...ok, but what are you saying?" I mean, it's clear to me that she's not an anti-Semite, but being honest I really don't know what her slant is outside of being generically anti-Israeli government. And this is usually the point where I'm sent links and clippings of what
other people have said, and
other critiques of Israel, to which my response is usually "...ok, and why didn't she say this?"
I just don't think that this is a position that Omar commands with any sort of authority. I think she has a lot of learning to do, because a lot of the traps she falls into are easy to avoid, and I think this contributes to the blowback she gets
on top of being Black, Muslim and female. I think this is fair to point out, and wonder if the 500th debate of semantics and language could be avoided if...she were more careful with semantics and her language in lieu of saying anything substantive. Is there a good chance that Omar would get this blowback regardless of what she said and how she said it? Of course. We're 6 years into the movement, and still have to explain to people that "Black Lives Matter" doesn't mean "Only Black Lives Matter." Some people will intentionally refuse to get it. Still, I would like Omar to define herself and what she stands for, because her not really doing that has allowed everyone else to do it for her.