• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oct 26, 2017
8,206
well then forgive me for not being offended by anything she said, because it was glaringly obvious what she was talking about. Her existing positions on every issue indicate she is not a person who hates based on religion or ethnicity, I have no reason to believe she is anti-semetic, and neither do you. And yet, you fault her for not playing the game by the rules created by our(?) enemies instead of faulting our enemies for making up these garbage rules in the first place. Can you not see why that's fucked?

If we keep expecting our representatives to play by these rules, nothing will ever change. This is the opportunity to cast away the fog that surrounds Israel and its crimes and stand on the side of justice but you'd rather play the stubborn forum smartypants because it's fun and upsets people.

Seeing that AOC had to retract her support for Palestine to get elected hurt me, but you probably thought it was great. It's time for someone to do better, and it isn't Omar, it's us.
I agree with this.
 
Oct 27, 2017
6,144
well then forgive me for not being offended by anything she said, because it was glaringly obvious what she was talking about. Her existing positions on every issue indicate she is not a person who hates based on religion or ethnicity, I have no reason to believe she is anti-semetic, and neither do you. And yet, you fault her for not playing the game by the rules created by our(?) enemies instead of faulting our enemies for making up these garbage rules in the first place. Can you not see why that's fucked?

If we keep expecting our representatives to play by these rules, nothing will ever change. This is the opportunity to cast away the fog that surrounds Israel and its crimes and stand on the side of justice but you'd rather play the stubborn forum smartypants because it's fun and upsets people.

Seeing that AOC had to retract her support for Palestine to get elected hurt me, but you probably thought it was great. It's time for someone to do better, and it isn't Omar, it's us.
You are acting like communicating effectively is a game with rules... How are you supposed to effectively "stand on the side of justice" when you are distracting everybody from your message with nonsense like "It's all about the Benjamins"? or do you consider that comment a righteous standing up for justice? It was a comment she threw out there carelessly, not a hill to die on.
 

Snowy

Banned
Nov 11, 2017
1,399
No, she CAN, people do it all the time without igniting controversy. We got Geraldo up there explicitly saying AIPAC is a lobby and he doesn't support Israel's treatment of Palestine but I haven't seen him fired from Fox News yet. The reason is because he's not invoking centuries old racism rooted in anti-semitism with loaded language like Omar did. It's actually not fucking hard to be critical of the Israel lobby without accidentally tripping over this shit.

Yeah, but what she said was fine and the backlash was either bad-faith or dumb, period.
 

Lv99 Slacker

Member
Oct 27, 2017
815
Some people will always do that though. So you just don't have to ever worry about effective communication then? Because clearly her criticism is not being effectively communicated, agree with it or not. Look at all this confusion.
Suppression of any speech critical of the Israeli government is the point. Period. AIPAC is lobbying legislators to pass bills that rob you and I (if you're American) of our First Amendment right to protest by outlawing boycotts of goods and services from Israel. There was even a earlier draft of a senate bill that added a steep fine and jail time. 26 states have passed bills to deny giving out contracts to businesses/non-profits that are pro-BDS.

All the states (with links to individual bills) that have passed anti-BDS laws: https://palestinelegal.org/news/2016/6/3/what-to-know-about-anti-bds-legislation
 

OrdinaryPrime

Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
11,042
At a certain point, there exists a responsibility on the American people to become more educated on Israel. It shouldn't just be up to politicians to hold countries or regimes accountable for their actions. Most politicians are not going to go forward without information or polls that show a proposed policy has widespread support. And frankly, there is widespread support for Israel in the USA, no matter what they do.

Could Congresswoman Omar have phrased her criticism more delicately? Sure. But in reality, I fear even if she had done it in ways pointed out in this thread, most of the reaction would be the same. It comes down to the fact that the US and its citizens do not care about the people of Palestine or the non-Jews in Israel.

No, she CAN, people do it all the time without igniting controversy. We got Geraldo up there explicitly saying AIPAC is a lobby and he doesn't support Israel's treatment of Palestine but I haven't seen him fired from Fox News yet. The reason is because he's not invoking centuries old racism rooted in anti-semitism with loaded language like Omar did. It's actually not fucking hard to be critical of the Israel lobby without accidentally tripping over this shit.

Geraldo isn't a congressperson.
 

marrec

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
6,775
well then forgive me for not being offended by anything she said, because it was glaringly obvious what she was talking about. Her existing positions on every issue indicate she is not a person who hates based on religion or ethnicity, I have no reason to believe she is anti-semetic, and neither do you. And yet, you fault her for not playing the game by the rules created by our(?) enemies instead of faulting our enemies for making up these garbage rules in the first place. Can you not see why that's fucked?

If we keep expecting our representatives to play by these rules, nothing will ever change. This is the opportunity to cast away the fog that surrounds Israel and its crimes and stand on the side of justice but you'd rather play the stubborn forum smartypants because it's fun and upsets people.

Seeing that AOC had to retract her support for Palestine to get elected hurt me, but you probably thought it was great. It's time for someone to do better, and it isn't Omar, it's us.

Fucking you don't have to be offended but don't be surprised or skeptical when people actually are offended or off-put. I have no reason to believe she's anti-semitic, which is why I'm not buying into this vapid resolution... and yes, the game is fucked because the rules were set up centuries ago and change is slow as molasses in December but we need people like Omar to be effective in their messaging and to not get bogged down by made-up controversies.

If you keep wanting our representatives to go into the temple and upset the money-changers table than don't be fucking surprised when they get crucified. (to use a possibly offensive analogy)

Yes, I'm happy that AOC retracted her public support of Palestine to get elected, because that means AOC is now in congress making shit happen instead of on the sidelines.

Change IS happening, the rules are being rewritten, the money-changers are getting kicked out of the temple, but it's going to take more time and until then you have to message in a way that's going to be effective, rather than a way that's going to be controversial.
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,123
Brooklyn, NY
And, worth keeping in mind, that Lowey's statement is based on the bad-faith reporting that twisted her words, but I guess Omar is supposed to shut up and accept that mischaracterization.

clearly, the morally right and intersectional thing to do is to side with powerful white people against a black Muslim woman and say that she brought it on herself by not being more careful with her words
 

Snowy

Banned
Nov 11, 2017
1,399
That wasn't my read. Pointing out that the language Omar used was evocative of anti-Semitic tropes is not calling her an anti-Semite, and I don't think that was Lowey's intent. But I understand the position.

There is a wire-crossing here where the good faith liberals desire to extend to accusations of offense by marginalized groups is being exploited for what are very obviously innocuous and true things Omar has said. Like, have we gotten to the point where we cannot just discern when something is bullshit, where everything has to be a big dialogue where people snap at points they agree with for whatever absurd reason?
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,963
clearly, the morally right and intersectional thing to do is to side with powerful white people against a black Muslim woman and say that she brought it on herself by not being more careful with her words

Now was that very obvious dig at me called for? I'd say no, because I've only been respectful to you.
 
Oct 27, 2017
6,144
Suppression of any speech critical of the Israeli government is the point. Period. AIPAC is lobbying legislators to pass bills that rob you and I (if you're American) of our First Amendment right to protest by outlawing boycotts of goods and services from Israel. There was even a earlier draft of a senate bill that added a steep fine and jail time. 26 states have passed bills to deny giving out contracts to businesses/non-profits that are pro-BDS.

All the states (with links to individual bills) that have passed anti-BDS laws: https://palestinelegal.org/news/2016/6/3/what-to-know-about-anti-bds-legislation
I just don't think you want to engage with how the speech in question is specifically being communicated.
 
Oct 25, 2017
1,713
You are acting like communicating effectively is a game with rules... How are you supposed to effectively "stand on the side of justice" when you are distracting everybody from your message with nonsense like "It's all about the Benjamins"? or do you consider that comment a righteous standing up for justice?
It is. No Jew that isn't clouded by loyalty or bought by Israel, no Jew that sees the truth and can separate the vile acts of greedy individuals from their own religion, is concerned about these words. We don't evaluate meaning in a context-free world. Who is Ilhan Omar? What motivates her? These things inform the meaning of her words. It is only those people with something to lose if the truth is exposed that seek to rip these words from the woman who wrote them and create their own, discrediting narrative. To me it is incredibly sad and entirely exhausting that we all apparently must come here and pretend we don't understand this when we talk about this subject.
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,123
Brooklyn, NY
At a certain point, there exists a responsibility on the American people to become more educated on Israel. It shouldn't just be up to politicians to hold countries or regimes accountable for their actions. Most politicians are not going to go forward without information or polls that show a proposed policy has widespread support. And frankly, there is widespread support for Israel in the USA, no matter what they do.

Could Congresswoman Omar have phrased her criticism more delicately? Sure. But in reality, I fear even if she had done it in ways pointed out in this thread, most of the reaction would be the same. It comes down to the fact that the US and its citizens do not care about the people of Palestine or the non-Jews in Israel.



Geraldo isn't a congressperson.

That's not on the American people as a whole; it's just the inevitable result of a world where the discourse is overwhelmingly biased towards Israel. Most of the electorate doesn't feel that strongly about Israel one way or another, and support is already declining among younger Jews and Democrats as activism and Bibi make people more aware of the reality of what Israel has become.
 
Oct 27, 2017
6,144
she totally does, aipac directly accused her of supporting anti-israeli terrorism

it doesn't blow up like this because she's a white christian and her criticisms are even milder than omar's
Idk a quick google search of Betty makes it seem like her criticism is far more severe than the specific language Omar is being criticized for, such as "It's all about the Benjamins".
 

Razgreez

Banned
Apr 13, 2018
366
Yes, I'm happy that AOC retracted her public support of Palestine to get elected, because that means AOC is now in congress making shit happen instead of on the sidelines.

Better to be an unprincipled congresswoman than a principled activist. I.e. Anything must be done to obtain power even if that requires hypocrisy.

Change IS happening, the rules are being rewritten, the money-changers are getting kicked out of the temple, but it's going to take more time and until then you have to message in a way that's going to be effective, rather than a way that's going to be controversial.

In other words change is fine as long as its at a pace and in a form that I, as the self appointed gatekeeper, am completely comfortable with.

Guess what, positive change is coming and it doesn't care how uncomfortable it makes you. Better get used to it.
 

Deleted member 15440

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,191
Idk a quick google search of Betty makes it seem like her criticism is far more severe than the specific language Omar is being criticized for, such as "It's all about the Benjamins".
she still says that israel is an important ally blah blah blah

to me a hard critique of israel would be saying that they're no longer an ally and we should be sanctioning them for their crimes against palestine. say that and see how bad the blowback gets.
 

Snowy

Banned
Nov 11, 2017
1,399
yeah this is what I don't get.

You don't change the acceptable boundaries of tone without pushing back against bullshit.

I want more people in power to talk about these issues in the way Omar is doing so, so of course I'm going to shame people "calling her out" for nonsense reasons (and the reasons have been purely nonsense from the start).
 

marrec

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
6,775
Better to be an unprincipled congresswoman than a principled activist. I.e. Anything must be done to obtain power even if that requires hypocrisy.

Ya, cause a principled activist is a nobody posting on ResetERA while an unprincipled congresswoman is out there making things happen.

In other words change is fine as long as its at a pace and in a form that I, as the self appointed gatekeeper, am completely comfortable with.

Guess what, positive change is coming and it doesn't care how uncomfortable it makes you. Better get used to it.

Who the fuck said I'm the gatekeeper? Who the fuck said anything about what I'm comfortable with?

I'm just the adult telling you how the world works.

Guess what, positive change is coming at an expected pace, better buckle up because it's going to be a slow and steady climb to the top of the mountain and I wouldn't want you to try and get out.
 

M.Bluth

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,257
More terrible takes from Bari Weiss

Whatever it takes to feel okay about all the shitty right-wing op-eds you approve of, Bari...

Oh, and the final sentence in that clips says it all. "The problem is that she still has the spot on the foreign affairs committee"
That's what it's always been about. They want her off that committee by any means necessary, and the "liberals" are more than happy to do their bidding.
 
Nov 9, 2017
3,777
Can one not condemn Israel for its horrible human rights violations, but also not support Palestine either? Supporting Palestine would be very hard for me based on their own human rights violations and history of treatment towards women and LGBT.
 

marrec

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
6,775
Can one not condemn Israel for its horrible human rights violations, but also not support Palestine either? Supporting Palestine would be very hard for me based on their own human rights violations and history of treatment towards women and LGBT.

I mean, I think the only moral position you can take is a solution which includes a strong Israeli and Palestinian state. You can criticize the actions of both states all day.
 

lmcfigs

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
12,091
Ya, cause a principled activist is a nobody posting on ResetERA while an unprincipled congresswoman is out there making things happen.

not exactly sure what your point is here. we have a ton of unprincipled politicians "out there making things happen". it doesn't mean anything to me if their positions are harmful.

Can one not condemn Israel for its horrible human rights violations, but also not support Palestine either? Supporting Palestine would be very hard for me based on their own human rights violations and history of treatment towards women and LGBT.

the thing is none of our representatives are even condemning Israel here. like we're not even getting that right.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
Can one not condemn Israel for its horrible human rights violations, but also not support Palestine either? Supporting Palestine would be very hard for me based on their own human rights violations and history of treatment towards women and LGBT.
Supporting that Palestinian citizens don't get lied to and killed on a constant basis and have their own stable state doesn't mean you have to support everything Palestine has ever done.
 

Tya

Member
Oct 30, 2017
3,662
She didn't say anything wrong. The focus should be entirely on the reaction to what she said.
 
Nov 9, 2017
3,777
Supporting that Palestinian citizens don't get lied to and killed on a constant basis and have their own stable state doesn't mean you have to support everything Palestine has ever done.

Well yeah, that is kind of the whole point of this thread. People need to have the ability to separate criticism of governmental policies and actions instead of criticizing people for simply being from a race/religion associated with those governments.
 

Razgreez

Banned
Apr 13, 2018
366
User Banned (3 days): Persistent hostility, antagonizing other members over a series of posts.
Well yeah, that is kind of the whole point of this thread. People need to have the ability to separate criticism of governmental policies and actions instead of criticizing people for simply being from a race/religion associated with those governments.

And who in this entire thread has criticised anyone "for simply being from a race/religion". Constant poorly masked red hearings by apartheid state supporters only serves to expose themselves
 
Oct 25, 2017
5,579
Racoon City
Being a black female muslim means she's literally on her own. Shit sucks, and the fact government officials basically swear fealty to Israel and everyone thinks that's fine is just wild to me.

Can't wait till that fealty spreads to Saudi Arabia and people are no longer allowed to be critical of them
 

FoneBone

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,823
Now was that very obvious dig at me called for? I'd say no, because I've only been respectful to you.
Are we honestly supposed to pretend you wouldn't be (rightfully!) incensed at the same kind of tone policing were it directed by straight white men at BLM or gay rights activists?
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,963
There is a wire-crossing here where the good faith liberals desire to extend to accusations of offense by marginalized groups is being exploited for what are very obviously innocuous and true things Omar has said. Like, have we gotten to the point where we cannot just discern when something is bullshit, where everything has to be a big dialogue where people snap at points they agree with for whatever absurd reason?

This is a good point. And clearly, a lot of what's being aimed at Omar is bullshit.

Taking on a purely academic view, I just find myself looking at Omar and thinking "...ok, but what are you saying?" I mean, it's clear to me that she's not an anti-Semite, but being honest I really don't know what her slant is outside of being generically anti-Israeli government. And this is usually the point where I'm sent links and clippings of what other people have said, and other critiques of Israel, to which my response is usually "...ok, and why didn't she say this?"

I just don't think that this is a position that Omar commands with any sort of authority. I think she has a lot of learning to do, because a lot of the traps she falls into are easy to avoid, and I think this contributes to the blowback she gets on top of being Black, Muslim and female. I think this is fair to point out, and wonder if the 500th debate of semantics and language could be avoided if...she were more careful with semantics and her language in lieu of saying anything substantive. Is there a good chance that Omar would get this blowback regardless of what she said and how she said it? Of course. We're 6 years into the movement, and still have to explain to people that "Black Lives Matter" doesn't mean "Only Black Lives Matter." Some people will intentionally refuse to get it. Still, I would like Omar to define herself and what she stands for, because her not really doing that has allowed everyone else to do it for her.
 
Nov 9, 2017
3,777
And who in this entire thread has criticised anyone "for simply being from a race/religion". Constant poorly masked red hearings by apartheid state supporters only serves to expose themselves

LOL, I guess if you support the right for Israel and it's people to exist in the region, that means you are an apartheid state supporter. Don't think I could have been more clear about my condemnation of Israel's current policies. Also it's "red herrings" not "red hearings".
 
Oct 26, 2017
6,261
LOL, I guess if you support the right for Israel and it's people to exist in the region, that means you are an apartheid state supporter. Don't think I could have been more clear about my condemnation of Israel's current policies. Also it's "red herrings" not "red hearings".

If we're gonna be pedantic language cunts then 'its' doesn't take an apostrophe for the possessive. And yes, if you support Israel you support apartheid. Pretty simple.
 

marrec

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
6,775
If we're gonna be pedantic language cunts then 'its' doesn't take an apostrophe for the possessive. And yes, if you support Israel you support apartheid. Pretty simple.

Oh wait, supporting the right for an Israeli state to exist is supporting apartheid now?
 
Oct 27, 2017
39,148
I am actually legit really angry about this.

Angry enough to almost wanting to say that if Trump wins in 2020, then the Democrats fucking deserved to lose to him for how fucking idiotic they have become.

Goddamnit.
I feel the same.

I am just feeling relief knowing there is nothing I can do about this and that I am not American to have to vote for such disgraceful pieces of shit. Fuck the democrats.
 
Oct 26, 2017
6,261
Oh wait, supporting the right for an Israeli state to exist is supporting apartheid now?

Yes? That and supporting the continuation of western colonialism. The entire concept of Israel as an ethnostate is a racist endeavour, allowing Jewish people their own country through the slow and deliberate elimination of the people already living there.
 

Razgreez

Banned
Apr 13, 2018
366
LOL, I guess if you support the right for Israel and it's people to exist in the region, that means you are an apartheid state supporter. Don't think I could have been more clear about my condemnation of Israel's current policies. Also it's "red herrings" not "red hearings".

Don't put those hasbarra promoted words in my innocent little mouth. Israel is an ethnostate and any support of it in any way serves, at best, as acquiescence to its actions. In reality any support for israel is support for apartheid. You might not wish to accept to but it's truth. Just like support for south africa during apartheid was support for apartheid - well at least people weren't ethnically cleansed even if they were systematically oppressed.
 
Last edited:
Nov 9, 2017
3,777
If we're gonna be pedantic language cunts then 'its' doesn't take an apostrophe for the possessive. And yes, if you support Israel you support apartheid. Pretty simple.

If you are saying anyone who supports the right for the Israeli people to exist in the region also supports apartheid, then you are a disgusting individual and I don't need to address you any further. That would be a textbook example of left-wing anti-semitism masked as concern for Palestine.
 

marrec

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
6,775
Yes? That and supporting the continuation of western colonialism. The entire concept of Israel as an ethnostate is a racist endeavour, allowing Jewish people their own country through the slow and deliberate elimination of the people already living there.

This is some crazy bullshit here lmao

You telling me you want Israel to stop existing as a state huh? Hmm...
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
When you criticize Trump and end up attempting to manufacture narrative against Ilhan Omar


"Yet Omar herself is doing something akin to what her disgusting opponents are doing to her: She has suggested that Americans who support Israel — by implication, Jews — are disloyal to the United States. "

From another brilliant WaPo opinion piece. Obviously when she says americans who support israel she's talking just about JEWS forgetting that a ton of non jewish people support israel and a ton of jewish people hate israel i guess
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
This is some crazy bullshit here lmao

You telling me you want Israel to stop existing as a state huh? Hmm...
I don't agree that Israel should cease to exist bc that would cause more problems than it would solve but Israel was started as a western colonialist state and that's like. not debatable. Do you think it just magically formed after WWII?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.