So I've been following the El Chapo case recently and I've been thinking about the question of drug use and the morality thereof. Obviously this board is generally pro-legalisation, as is most of the progressive side of politics and would probably classify drug use itself as an amoral action. I don't want this topic to be about the legalisation of drugs because it's a future hypothetical. My question is about the morality of using illegal drugs (so we can probably exclude marijuana from this discussion now although it certain fits historically) knowing that it's very likely that the money you've used to purchase it will fund violence and despicable crimes.
So just to get back to El Chapo, as a summary of his crimes (just from Wiki):
They also had evidence that he would pay $5,000 for to get access to 13 year old girls, and you can probably figure out the rest. It's probably a reasonable assumption that this kind of behaviour isn't limited to El Chapo and his cartel.
There's always a lot of discussion around responsible sourcing of goods and a lot of focus on companies that are seen to be running dodgy supply chains. Boycotts happen, pressure is put on to change, etc. Is it enough to just say "We should legalise/de-criminalise drugs because it will hurt cartels" (discussion for a different topic)? Shouldn't it be heavily, heavily discouraged just based on what it's funding?
So just to get back to El Chapo, as a summary of his crimes (just from Wiki):
The court alleged that Guzmán used professional assassins to carry out "hundreds of acts of violence, including murders, assaults, kidnappings, assassinations and acts of torture".
They also had evidence that he would pay $5,000 for to get access to 13 year old girls, and you can probably figure out the rest. It's probably a reasonable assumption that this kind of behaviour isn't limited to El Chapo and his cartel.
There's always a lot of discussion around responsible sourcing of goods and a lot of focus on companies that are seen to be running dodgy supply chains. Boycotts happen, pressure is put on to change, etc. Is it enough to just say "We should legalise/de-criminalise drugs because it will hurt cartels" (discussion for a different topic)? Shouldn't it be heavily, heavily discouraged just based on what it's funding?