1. HyGogg

    HyGogg
    Banned Member

    I have savings, but until I pay off my student loans, and buy a house, irit difficult for me to think of any of that as earmarked for "retirement."

    I spent most of my adult life below the poverty line, and real long term savings in excess of $5,000 or so is pretty new to me. I now save abput $10,000 a year and hopefully that'll be good enough.
     
  2. Silence

    Silence
    Member



    It's the opposite for me. I just looked, and my savings rate for this year is 44% of take home (and that's down from last year). Not bragging at all. After savings my take home pay is $26k. I'm not rolling in it. I'll be lucky if I retire with 500k (that's my goal).

    What I am doing is taking responsibility for my future. I don't want to work forever. Seems like a lot of people do. That seems crazy to me.
     
  3. Well for me its done automaticly.....
    But imma save up anyway cuz retirement money here in the netherlands is like 700-900 euros a month.....

    My grandparents worked hard all their live and only get that. Ofcourse theres a few 100s added for rental home payback and healthcare but still thats only around 1200 a month then for 1 person.
     
  4. Clockwork

    Clockwork
    Member


    Are you investing that?

    $500k seems very low. I mean even with my paltry 6% plus employer matching I am projected to have at least $800k (at one point this was even higher).

    I have seen a personal rate of return so far this year of 40.46%. In 2017 it was 20.82%. In 2016 it was 15.49%. 2015 was 13.65%. 2014 was 22.06%. Since 2005 to now it has been about 13.6% (annualized) or 485.76% (cumulative).

    Saving is fine but you have to make your money work for you too. If you are not seeing decent returns (hence me questioning $500k when you are saving 44% of your income) it is time to start moving those funds around.
     
  5. Weeniekuns

    Weeniekuns
    Member


    You need to factor in things like taxes and maintenance.... Even if you were gifted a free house; lets say its $300k. You would still need to come up with ~$6k/yr just in property taxes alone and that will only go up as the value of your house goes up.
     
  6. Peltz

    Peltz
    Member

    Sarcasm?
     
  7. tabris

    tabris
    Member

    Not at all. I rather live large young and have a subpar life in retirement, then have a modest life young and a modest life old.

    I made a thread on this already: https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-do-you-save-for-retirement-and-why-i-dont.35512/

     
  8. Silence

    Silence
    Member

    Of course I'm investing it. I made about 22% last year. A 40% return this year is insane, I'm not saying I don't believe you, but I don't believe you. Unless you are buying individual stocks and got very, very lucky (and took a big risk).

    The market as a whole is not even close to that. Dow YTD is around 5%, S&P is around the same. Care to share how you made 40% in that market without incredible luck?

    Edit: also, I don't expect those kinds of returns over time, I'm estimating around 5-6% average over time. If it's better, great! But I always play conservative.

    Also, 6% of what? See, that matters. 6% of 200k, sure, thats something, 6% of what I make? You'd never retire.
     
  9. KillLaCam

    KillLaCam
    Member

    Saving? I'm banking on the apocalypse/ stock money
     
  10. Pein

    Pein
    Member

    between my parents owning a bunch of houses in nyc I’m just coasting and not worrying too much.
     
  11. Clockwork

    Clockwork
    Member

    I only make $61k per year. My employer matches my contribution up to 6%.

    93% of my 401k portfolio value wise is company stock (I used to contribute only to the BNY Mellon Small Cap Stock Index Fund Instl then in 2011 I put 50 percent into company stock. In 2014 I put the remaining 50% into company stock). The other 7% is JPMCB Large Cap Growth Fund CF-A. I have just recently started putting money into that instead of the company stock because at my contribution rate the stock is no longer affordable. The YTD rate of return for just the stock alone would have been 42.55%. The JPMCB Large Cap Growth Fund CF-A has had horrible performance with a YTD rate of return of -0.82%. It's pretty gross.

    I don't really give two shits what you believe.
     
  12. Freakzilla

    Freakzilla
    Member

    Wife and I just started our 457k but we have pensions. We each have a 500k life insurance plan that we will bump up to 1mil but that is for our children
     
  13. Charismagik

    Charismagik
    Member

    Didn't get into saving until 30s. Upper 40s now and i'm only like ___k in 401k, but i'm putting 25% in. I do have some savings account also if that counts. I feel like I'm screwed for retirement, but we'll see. Oh, I also have a pension with Coke(been there for 16), but no idea how much it would amount to haha

    Edited to remove saved amount...figured that wasn't worth posting
     
  14. stan_marsh

    stan_marsh
    Member

    I'm 29, I have about $0 saved up for retirement right now.

    I'll probably off myself before then anyway.
     
  15. Charismagik

    Charismagik
    Member

    And how do people get these crazy returns on investment. I think mine is like 90% stocks(index funds?) and 10% bonds. I got like 12ish% last year and this year was mostly negative
     
  16. Braaier

    Braaier
    Member

    I max out 401k, max out IRA, and have a pension from my former employer and one from my current employer. I should be able to retire fairly early.
     
  17. Peltz

    Peltz
    Member

    It’s much harder to go from luxury to simplicity than the other way around. Furthermore, you’re missing the time value of money and actually shortchanging how large you could live overall.

    There’s nothing wrong with enjoying the present, but you could live larger and larger as you go if you do it better. No reason to literally plan to have your finances blow up in your face like that.

    Experiencing growth in wealth, not just through salary, but through smart investments, can be extremely rewarding.

    And about “letting yourself be happier” and “not working as hard”... well, neither of those things should mean that you need to spend your cash to the point of financial insecurity.

    You may not plan to have kids, but if you ever do have them, don’t you want to not be a burden in your old age, but instead, be a source of stability for them?

    Really think about what you’re doing. You say you’re privileged. Don’t you want your kids and grandkids to feel the same?
     
  18. jb1234

    jb1234
    Member

    $0. I rely on a disability check and it ain’t much. If SS runs out of money in the future, I’m fucked.
     
  19. Neo C.

    Neo C.
    Member

    30 to 40%. No plans for retirement though, just hope I can lower my work hours every few years till I eventually reach a satisfying work/life balance.
     
  20. Silence

    Silence
    Member

    A -0.82% is pretty reasonable this year. The market has been up and down. You have A LOT of one stock. You had a good year, which is great, and now is great time for you to diversify. I wouldn't expect to get that kind of return every year (you seem smart enough to know that).

    I used to work for GE, a place where people did what you are doing, put a lot into company stock. It worked for years, until it didn't, and now a lot of retirees are in a bad place (source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenkam...c-retirees-take-another-beating/#349af565205c ).

    Time in market will matter too. My goal is 500k, because I don't want to work until I'm 65, some people do. I live on less than 25k a year now, so that goal will put me in a comfortable range. You can hit 700k at 6%, but you'll need longer in the market then I feel like working. But do what works for you.

    Sorry if you thought my tone was hostile, it wasn't my intent. I did want to point out that suggesting a normal investor could get a 44% YTD in 2018 was not something people should expect without huge risk.
     
  21. Clockwork

    Clockwork
    Member

    Word. Accusations of dishonesty is a pet peeve of mine so my final sentence was a reflection of that.

    Regarding the negative return being gross comment that is because the only time within the last 14 or so years I have seen a negative return (or hell even close to it) was during the 2008/2009 recession (and looking at historical graphs that was just a blip for me).