Of course. Just that sparring isn't fighting.But that doesn't mean that weight wouldn't be a factor favoring the huge fella. I don't get the argument.
Of course. Just that sparring isn't fighting.But that doesn't mean that weight wouldn't be a factor favoring the huge fella. I don't get the argument.
I get that. I said that the argument that weight does matter reminds me of the clip, I didn't post it as scientific evidence. Just a funny video.
It's always a factor. And an important one. I don't think you and i even have an argument, haha. The outcome of a real win depends on a lot of stuff. Weight certainly being an important factor. We're just trying to guess the outcome of fictitious fights.I get that. I said that the argument that weight does matter reminds me of the clip, I didn't post it as scientific evidence. Just a funny video.
Even though I'd argue it still shows that weight is a factor, since their sparring kinda makes skill (another obviously important factor) irrelevant.
No we don't, and that makes me glad, because I like you.It's always a factor. And an important one. I don't think you and i even have an argument. The outcome of a real win depends on a lot of stuff. Weight certainly being an important factor. We're just trying to guess the outcome of fictitious fights.
It's certainly a factor. Maybe that's why all these sports have weight classes.
What Martial Arts are you training in? I've been training for just under 30 years and weight/size is generally a huge factor.
What makes you say it isn't?
Yes I am, because there is a sweet spot for advantages related to weight and size. I'm not an expert at kinetics, but I'm pretty sure someone with better knowledge in this specific field could easily explain this. Guys above a certain weight and size can be pretty much useless in a fight, because of their energy deficit.Aren't all of those things additional factors? Like, I am getting legit confused here. None of that goes against what I said originally about weight difference mattering in martial arts.
Are you telling me that two kung fu people of exact same skill are equally matched even if their stature is Mountain VS McGregor?
If their skill is the same but one can also pick up and crush the other, how is the bigger fighter not favored?
I guess the advantage/disadvantage you get from bigger size and more weight is on a (bell?) curve. Depends on what moves they can/are allowed to use as well.Yes I am, because there is a sweet spot for advantages related to weight and size. I'm not an expert at kinetics, but I'm pretty sure someone with better knowledge in this specific field could easily explain this. Guys above a certain weight and size can be pretty much useless in a fight, because of their energy deficit.
If you weigh 180kg you're going to gas much faster than a 75kg guy - based on the same principles of physics that also make a heavy guy's punches hit harder.
Your advantage of hitting harder has diminishing returns - if you get hit by a trained 180kg guy vs. a 75kg guy that's like the difference between like getting hit by a Smart at 50mp/h or a SUV...you're "dead" either way. Bigger reach is a much more important factor if you ask me, but on the other hand a bigger guy is also a bigger target.
What I mean by kinetics is for example that a footbal player like Roberto Carlos, a rather short guy, still holds the record for one of the fastest free-kicks in professional football.
The human body is a complex machine and this combined with technique makes the equation much more complex than simply calculating pure force by using velocity and mass.
Yes I am, because there is a sweet spot for advantages related to weight and size. I'm not an expert at kinetics, but I'm pretty sure someone with better knowledge in this specific field could easily explain this. Guys above a certain weight and size can be pretty much useless in a fight, because of their energy deficit.
If you weigh 180kg you're going to gas much faster than a 75kg guy - based on the same principles of physics that also make a heavy guy's punches hit harder.
Your advantage of hitting harder has diminishing returns - if you get hit by a trained 180kg guy vs. a 75kg guy that's like the difference between like getting hit by a Smart at 50mp/h or a SUV...you're "dead" either way. Bigger reach is a much more important factor if you ask me, but on the other hand a bigger guy is also a bigger target.
What I mean by kinetics is for example that a footbal player like Roberto Carlos, a rather short guy, still holds the record for one of the fastest free-kicks in professional football.
The human body is a complex machine and this combined with technique makes the equation much more complex than simply calculating pure force by using velocity and mass.
There were times where i swear Sapp was crying from pain in the ring. He really was a punching bag and shouldn't have ever entered the ring.The prime example would be Bob Sapps K1 carreer. Dude ran out of gas extremely quickly and became a punching bag for his opponents, but if he managed to hit you while he still had something in the tank, it was often game over because of his weight and frame/force. But Sapp also had terrible technique and a glass jaw so there might be other examples.
Yeah also a sad story. Too tall... And way too slow. Dude had to stop fights because the lowkicks he received made him collaps under his own weight.
The prime example would be Bob Sapps K1 carreer. Dude run out of gas extremely quickly and became a punching bag for his opponents, but if he managed to hit you while he still had something in the tank, it was often game over because of his weight and frame/force. But Sapp also had terrible technique and a glass jaw so there might be other examples.
It is pretty black and white. 2 fighters of similar skill in fighting, the larger one is most likely to win. Physiologically, it harder to overcome a larger opponent than it is an opponent of equal size and reach, and a larger person will have a much easier time against a smaller opponent. Think of it like this: ever wondered when you play fought with your siblings or friends and that one smaller kid never really was able to get free of any holds? It's not that they lacked the will to tussle with the rest, it's just really, really difficult to break free with your strength when someone of bigger mass is exerting their strength. Imagine if MMA fights allowed heavy weights vs light weights. It would be a whole lot of hilarity for the first few rounds then just plain boring.Not nearly as black and white as you make it out to be. Thai nak muays regularly overpower and overwhelm much larger opponents, as do the top level judoka.
Favours? Yes, but is there such thing as equally skilled? This terminology doesn't apply to reality. A cheetah may be the fastest land animal on earth, but a hyena can maintain it's top speed at a far bigger distance. There are always pros and cons.Look, the real question is:
Could Bruce Lee in his prime beat Bruce Leeroy after he unlocked the power of The Glow? And how would he fare against Sho'Nuff, the Shogun of Harlem?
I guess the advantage/disadvantage you get from bigger size and more weight is on a (bell?) curve. Depends on what moves they can/are allowed to use as well.
I'm still going to go with "weight difference usually favours the heavier of equally skilled fighters" as the rule of thumb.
I wouldn't call it a glass jaw. If you're to slow to react with your low stamina making things worse a titan jaw won't help you if a Crocop high-kick hits your head. Sap suffered from many disadvantages due to his size and weight. And yes, on a professional level everyone can land a lucky punch and turn around a fight in theory and Sapp's weight surely helped compensating for the complete lack of technique, BUT a lighter guy will have a much easier time developing a technique that takes full advantage of his body. You can't make an Elefant jump around gracefully like a Gazelle.The prime example would be Bob Sapps K1 carreer. Dude ran out of gas extremely quickly and became a punching bag for his opponents, but if he managed to hit you while he still had something in the tank, it was often game over because of his weight and frame/force. But Sapp also had terrible technique and a glass jaw so there might be other examples.
Not as strong as Tyler Malka.
I hope people get the reference...
Don't worry, we do. Haha.Not as strong as Tyler Malka.
I hope people get the reference...
He was never a professional fighter, and the public accounts of fights that he actually got into seem to vary wildly.
I am not sure how it is people come to the conclusion that he was one of the best of his time, when he seems to have no real discernible record.
Because of the stories of the people who witnessed him spar, some of which are from the champions of the time. Chuck has spoken highly of his ability as did Jim Kelly, another Martial Arts champion from the same era. So while he didn't compete officially, he did spar and train with champions, all of which have spoken incredibly highly of his ability. His speed, his form, and his strength. There's really no reason for them to speak of him so highly if he didn't have the talent to back it up.
Tons of gym stars appear to be world killers but crumple under the bright lights of real competition.
Which has what exactly to do with what I said? The post I was answering said they don't know how Bruce got the reputation of being one of the best. I explained how that came to be.
But even if you want to talk about the "bright lights of real competition," there's a marked difference between being center stage in a widely broadcast competitive bout (like say a boxing world championship) and the never broadcast championships of the Martial Arts tournaments of the time. So even questioning the effect of the pressure of competition, competing in those tournements would've been more akin to something like Amateur divisions in other contact sports in terms of actual exposure. Hard to speculate nerves/pressure in such an environment.
Damn I remember that. That was buried lol.Not as strong as Tyler Malka.
I hope people get the reference...
I didn't really mean bright lights as in a big show. When you spar, its usually as part of an overall training regime and even hard sparring is limited. No matter the rule set, most fight don't usually last more than a few minutes. Most people dont just meet up with a fresh sparring training and decide to g HAM for 5 minutes and then be done with it.
Its way easier to get a reputation within the controlled environment of closed off sparring sessions than doing it "live" live.
strong enough to start growing proto-wings out the sides of his body
I mean it's hard to say how good he would've done in actual competition because full contact kickboxing wasn't really much of a thing until after he died.
Makes the movie seem even worse.Bruce Lee spoke highly of Ali. In an interview, he said that Ali could beat him and that he was inspired by him.
Full contact kickboxing was thriving in Southeast Asia, Vale Tudo was a thing in South America and knockdown Karate was pretty big in Netherlands/Germany. It wasn't a nig thing in the US, I agree.
Saying he's the greatest martial artist is like saying the Harlem Globetrotters are the best basketball players.
He did.i was under the impression that bruce lee said muhammad ali would have killed him in a fight
The movie is a fiction. I actually loved the shit talking full of himself Lee we saw in the movie. It's a different take.
Bruce Lee was trained at a gym. He wasn't an actual fighter similar to how stunt people are not actual fighters. I believe he'd lose most fights cause he doesn't have actual training to beat you up. He has form like how a person who knows karate isn't going to actually be able to do those moves outside proper matches.
Also, "trained at a gym"? Where do you think fighters train? The forest?
Bruce Lee was a product of his time. But he's also the god father of mixed martial arts. He blended in different disciplines and styles. Bruce Lee was a legit badass. Extremely fast and insane balance. But he wasn't some unstoppable god in anyway.
It is pretty black and white. 2 fighters of similar skill in fighting, the larger one is most likely to win. Physiologically, it harder to overcome a larger opponent than it is an opponent of equal size and reach, and a larger person will have a much easier time against a smaller opponent. Think of it like this: ever wondered when you play fought with your siblings or friends and that one smaller kid never really was able to get free of any holds? It's not that they lacked the will to tussle with the rest, it's just really, really difficult to break free with your strength when someone of bigger mass is exerting their strength. Imagine if MMA fights allowed heavy weights vs light weights. It would be a whole lot of hilarity for the first few rounds then just plain boring.
One weird thing about most karate is that you're trained to stop and pull strikes in both katas and (no/low contact) point sparring so shaking off those habits would be tough.