• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

leder

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,111
Poor people do. There isn't robots doing all the food production and delivery. Do you think in the future that steaks will just come cut outta nowhere? What about rice? Pasta? Vegetables? Like, the whole idea of putting food under lock and key is paranoia because it literally cannot be done without human protection along every avenue in which food is produced. You can't grow livestock, vegetables, etc. in some massive bunker and somehow supply the world. It doesn't work that way. It's wishful paranoia thinking.

If we're at a point in human civilization where a collapse has occurred, direct policy will mean nothing. They may as well talk about making a space station like Elysium (it's not even remotely possible with our level of technology).



Well, we'll come back to that when the food storage wars begin. Until then? It's paranoid rich people thinking they can live a life of luxury in an apocalyptic world somehow. Maybe we should wait and see if an apocalypse even occurs.

Dude, we're not arguing that it's going to work out for them. Why are you getting so hung up on this? We're saying this is the exact reason why we need to take the keys away.
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
Well, we'll come back to that when the food storage wars begin. Until then? It's paranoid rich people thinking they can live a life of luxury in an apocalyptic world somehow. Maybe we should wait and see if an apocalypse even occurs.
Uh, no? Why would I wait until a crisis is on top of me to respond to the crisis. This is like saying "we should wait for recession to actually happen instead of trying to prevent recession proactively".

That's just weird.

By the time the resource wars happen it'll already be too late to fix things.
 

Deleted member 12790

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
24,537
I'm reminded of that episode of the outer limits where a group of people did just this, and their robot guards wound up keeping them prisoners in their compound for like hundreds of years after the Apocalypse had ended.
 

Deleted member 6949

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,786
Honestly i would rather get slaughtered in the first wave than be some fuckin poindexter trying desperately to maintain leverage over my minions.
 
Oct 27, 2017
10,660
They might think their fictitious wealth will help them should the world go to shit, but it won't. The only thing that will help anyone in this doomsday scenario is the capability to inflict violence.
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
I mean I'm kind of joking, but I'm nor seeing anything pretty either.
I'm not joking at all. Whether intentional or coincidental Amazon is coming to dominate much of our infrastructure, physical and digital. When we have websites hosted on AWS servers and fleets of robotic trucks delivering Amazon Basics™ goods, Bezos is on track to be the primary user/controller of much of the developed world in a decade or two. His hegemony will be even more complete once delivery drones become the norm.
 

subpar spatula

Refuses to Wash his Ass
Member
Oct 26, 2017
22,129
Uh, no? Why would I wait until a crisis is on top of me to respond to the crisis. This is like saying "we should wait for recession to actually happen instead of trying to prevent recession proactively".

That's just weird.

By the time the resource wars happen it'll already be too late to fix things.
Because you're waiting for the apocalypse on the words of paranoid rich people who think the human civilization will collapse.

That's where access to military grade autonomous drones comes in. Bezos knows what he's doing.

How do drones operate for such a long time in an post-apocalyptic world? There won't be power or infrastructure to make sure these drones are long term. Or we just talking about the apocalypse as in, "Things went slightly downhill, but the government, resource pipelines, and everything else is basically intact". In which case there was no apocalypse.
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
Because you're waiting for the apocalypse on the words of paranoid rich people who think the human civilization will collapse.
I'm not waiting for anything. Actually, I assumed that was your position.
Well, let me know when these super bunkers are up and running and food supplies are now being lock and keyed.

I'll be waiting.
Well, we'll come back to that when the food storage wars begin. Until then? It's paranoid rich people thinking they can live a life of luxury in an apocalyptic world somehow. Maybe we should wait and see if an apocalypse even occurs.
I want to take action against the tech rich NOW to prevent probable harm LATER. My stance on this is no different than my stances on climate change or economic recession. Waiting for shit to hit the fan before you take action is far too late.
 

subpar spatula

Refuses to Wash his Ass
Member
Oct 26, 2017
22,129
I'm not waiting for anything. Actually, I assumed that was your position.


I want to take action against the tech rich NOW to prevent probable harm LATER. My stance on this is no different than my stances on climate change or economic recession. Waiting for shit to hit the fan before you take action is far too late.
I get what you're saying but you're then believing their paranoia. There's no need to prepare for things like rich people hording all the world's food because that's impossible. Or them getting robot guards. Or whatever fantasy apocalypse where they somehow retain all their status. It doesn't work that way, and people should actively ignore such paranoia and work on legit issues that will cascade like climate change, inequality, etc. Them fantasizing about how to retain power in an apocalypse is not on the radar.
 

capitalCORN

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
10,436
How do drones operate for such a long time in an post-apocalyptic world? There won't be power or infrastructure to make sure these drones are long term. Or we just talking about the apocalypse as in, "Things went slightly downhill, but the government, resource pipelines, and everything else is basically intact". In which case there was no apocalypse.

I imagine much the way a roomba backs up to it's charger. The smoldering husk is just fantasy, but to ignore the history of human tyranny is just farcical as well. Police snipers in Brazil are going full IDF on favelas right now. I'm not about to let my guard down simply because I lack the imagination for it.
 

subpar spatula

Refuses to Wash his Ass
Member
Oct 26, 2017
22,129
I imagine much the way a roomba backs up to it's charger. The smoldering husk is just fantasy, but to ignore the history of human tyranny is just farcical as well. Police snipers in Brazil are going full IDF on favelas right now. I'm not about to let my guard down simply because I lack the imagination for it.
I think you can let go of the idea that in a post-apocalyptic world that there will be enough infrastructure similar to The Maze Runner to operate and house an army.
 

Shodan14

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
9,410
I get what you're saying but you're then believing their paranoia. There's no need to prepare for things like rich people hording all the world's food because that's impossible. Or them getting robot guards. Or whatever fantasy apocalypse where they somehow retain all their status. It doesn't work that way, and people should actively ignore such paranoia and work on legit issues that will cascade like climate change, inequality, etc. Them fantasizing about how to retain power in an apocalypse is not on the radar.
But that's hard. Surely it'll just happen on its own once you've abolished the billionaires?
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
I get what you're saying but you're then believing their paranoia. There's no need to prepare for things like rich people hording all the world's food because that's impossible. Or them getting robot guards. Or whatever fantasy apocalypse where they somehow retain all their status. It doesn't work that way, and people should actively ignore such paranoia and work on legit issues that will cascade like climate change, inequality, etc. Them fantasizing about how to retain power in an apocalypse is not on the radar.
I believe there will be resource wars regardless of some rich nerds think and that runaway climate change will incite some of these crises people associate with the apocalypse.

The rich people fantasy in the OP informs only a part of my predictions. There's numerous other factors that cause me to think we're headed toward crisis.

However it cannot be stated enough that the rich are constantly an obstacle standing in the way of reform, whether it's for carbon emissions, inequality, housing, infrastructure, taxes, government, and so on and so forth. So they're a problem regardless of how realistic or fantastic their delusions are. The stuff in the OP, for me, is only an indication that the rich cannot be trusted with their power, nor can they be trusted to have the general populace's welfare in mind and need to be taxed into oblivion before they solidify their power over policy.
 

Akira86

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,589
WTF? No it won't. The United States doesn't represent the world. We will have a little effect in social influencing other countries when that happens but the way people are getting exploited is far more severe than here in the states and is at risk of violent uprisings once the tipping point of ecological change is reached.




Don't provide cover for hypocrites advocating for murder of the rich.
oh, but darling we're all hypocrites, here
 

Mivey

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,826
If you're on the Titanic, and wanna survive, the smarter choice would be to make sure it doesn't hit that iceberg, instead of trying procure your own exclusive lifeboat. Just sayin'
 

Zeno

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,150
lq1QFuql.jpg
 

Mammoth Jones

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,309
New York
As long as the plebs have Netflix and porn they have nothing to fear...

But if they keep taking to the point folks can't even have that.....they gonna get that King Louie treatment.
 

Deleted member 18360

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,844
In a world where wealth = power and the system of wealth acquisition is institutionally biased against non-whites, and capitalism is the consolidation of wealth, I think it does qualify as a strain of fascism.

That is how I'm thinking about it, too. And even if other factors, like race, were mitigated, it would seem that the rich would just have to create some other flimsy narrative about how their gross excess of power over the masses is natural or just or metaphysically necessary.
 

samoyed

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
15,191
That is how I'm thinking about it, too. And even if other factors, like race, were mitigated, it would seem that the rich would just have to create some other flimsy narrative about how their gross excess of power over the masses is natural or just or metaphysically necessary.
In a world that's strictly meritocratic where everyone has the opportunity to become part of this class, since much of it is built on inequality, I do believe this class would cease to exist. Therefore, the only conclusion that can be drawn regarding those who promote and benefit from the status quo is that they're cryptofascists, and they are blind to even their own fasicistic impulses as they erroneously believe this (inequality to their benefit) is simply the normal state of things.
 

Deleted member 18360

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,844
In a world that's strictly meritocratic where everyone has the opportunity to become part of this class, since much of it is built on inequality, I do believe this class would cease to exist. Therefore, the only conclusion that can be drawn regarding those who promote and benefit from the status quo is that they're cryptofascists, and they are blind to even their own fasicistic impulses as they erroneously believe this (inequality to their benefit) is simply the normal state of things.

Agreed, again.
 

MrNewVegas

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,718
If you follow the rules laid out by the Parker Bros, there is only one winner in Monopoly.

Time to not follow the rules. No need to let this get to French Revolution levels.
 

Rendering...

Member
Oct 30, 2017
19,089
Tax billionaires out of existence. These leeches could literally avert an ecological apocalypse and jumpstart a scientific revolution that could raise the living standards of the entire world if they weren't so greedy.
 

nded

Member
Nov 14, 2017
10,573
Their security force would probably just kill them and take their stuff at some point unless the billionaire turned to be an actually capable leader.
 

Baji Boxer

Chicken Chaser
Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,380
So... just for academic purposes what would peoples answers be to those questions?

ps3ud0 8)

I've had intro level university courses in a wide variety of subjects, including enviromental science, so I'll give this a shot ;-)

"Which region will be less affected by the coming climate crisis: New Zealand or Alaska?"

I say forget both and go to Greenland. They'll have access to massive amounts of freshwater from the arctic glacier melt, pretty nice weather, set up well for renewable energy when the rest of the world is cooking (hydro electric), and excellent mineral resources.

"Is Google really building Ray Kurzweil a home for his brain, and will his consciousness live through the transition, or will it die and be reborn as a whole new one?"

No idea, but in the off chance his brain survives, he would still be Ray Kurzweil. Brain damage of course could change him to essentially be someone else, but that's just true in general. There life and death is an interesting philosophical question. Like if you have permanent amnesia and damage changes aspects of your personality, the same question could be asked. When a relative was in a very advanced state of alzheimers before they died, I've heard some say that they had already been grieving because the person they knew was already gone.

"How do I maintain authority over my security force after the Event?"

First off, they'll probably be dead of natural causes before the type of total societal colapse that would necessitate a doomsday bunker. But should such an unlikely Event to occur, you're probably fucked if you've hired professional security. The best way to get security would be to set yourself up as a cult leader. Make your bunker big enough to sustain a small community, and be their messiah. They'll learn to use the weapons and will be more loyal.

And reading their questions, I would have to agree with Michelle Obama that these ultrawealthy elites generally aren't particularly bright lol.