Naise.
Poor people do. There isn't robots doing all the food production and delivery. Do you think in the future that steaks will just come cut outta nowhere? What about rice? Pasta? Vegetables? Like, the whole idea of putting food under lock and key is paranoia because it literally cannot be done without human protection along every avenue in which food is produced. You can't grow livestock, vegetables, etc. in some massive bunker and somehow supply the world. It doesn't work that way. It's wishful paranoia thinking.
If we're at a point in human civilization where a collapse has occurred, direct policy will mean nothing. They may as well talk about making a space station like Elysium (it's not even remotely possible with our level of technology).
Well, we'll come back to that when the food storage wars begin. Until then? It's paranoid rich people thinking they can live a life of luxury in an apocalyptic world somehow. Maybe we should wait and see if an apocalypse even occurs.
Uh, no? Why would I wait until a crisis is on top of me to respond to the crisis. This is like saying "we should wait for recession to actually happen instead of trying to prevent recession proactively".Well, we'll come back to that when the food storage wars begin. Until then? It's paranoid rich people thinking they can live a life of luxury in an apocalyptic world somehow. Maybe we should wait and see if an apocalypse even occurs.
That was also kind of a Brendan Frasier movie.I'm reminded of that episode of the outer limits where a group of people did just this, and their robot guards wound up keeping them prisoners in their compound for like hundreds of years after the Apocalypse had ended.
That's where access to military grade autonomous drones comes in. Bezos knows what he's doing.They might think their fictitious wealth will help them should the world go to shit, but it won't. The only thing that will help anyone in this doomsday scenario is the capability to inflict violence.
This 100%.That's where access to military grade autonomous drones comes in. Bezos knows what he's doing.
Post-apocalyptic communism vs robo-capitalism.That's where access to military grade autonomous drones comes in. Bezos knows what he's doing.
I mean I'm kind of joking, but I'm nor seeing anything pretty either. More like a 1984 style mutually assured perpetuity scenario of fortress states instigated by plutocrats and cutthroat strongmen, kinda like what's kinda happening now.
I'm not joking at all. Whether intentional or coincidental Amazon is coming to dominate much of our infrastructure, physical and digital. When we have websites hosted on AWS servers and fleets of robotic trucks delivering Amazon Basics™ goods, Bezos is on track to be the primary user/controller of much of the developed world in a decade or two. His hegemony will be even more complete once delivery drones become the norm.I mean I'm kind of joking, but I'm nor seeing anything pretty either.
Just look at Afghanistan. Should shit hit the fan, that's the model.I mean I'm kind of joking, but I'm nor seeing anything pretty either. More like a 1984 style mutually assured perpetuity scenario of fortress states instigated by plutocrats and cutthroat strongmen, kinda like what's kinda happening now.
Because you're waiting for the apocalypse on the words of paranoid rich people who think the human civilization will collapse.Uh, no? Why would I wait until a crisis is on top of me to respond to the crisis. This is like saying "we should wait for recession to actually happen instead of trying to prevent recession proactively".
That's just weird.
By the time the resource wars happen it'll already be too late to fix things.
That's where access to military grade autonomous drones comes in. Bezos knows what he's doing.
I'm not waiting for anything. Actually, I assumed that was your position.Because you're waiting for the apocalypse on the words of paranoid rich people who think the human civilization will collapse.
Well, let me know when these super bunkers are up and running and food supplies are now being lock and keyed.
I'll be waiting.
I want to take action against the tech rich NOW to prevent probable harm LATER. My stance on this is no different than my stances on climate change or economic recession. Waiting for shit to hit the fan before you take action is far too late.Well, we'll come back to that when the food storage wars begin. Until then? It's paranoid rich people thinking they can live a life of luxury in an apocalyptic world somehow. Maybe we should wait and see if an apocalypse even occurs.
I get what you're saying but you're then believing their paranoia. There's no need to prepare for things like rich people hording all the world's food because that's impossible. Or them getting robot guards. Or whatever fantasy apocalypse where they somehow retain all their status. It doesn't work that way, and people should actively ignore such paranoia and work on legit issues that will cascade like climate change, inequality, etc. Them fantasizing about how to retain power in an apocalypse is not on the radar.I'm not waiting for anything. Actually, I assumed that was your position.
I want to take action against the tech rich NOW to prevent probable harm LATER. My stance on this is no different than my stances on climate change or economic recession. Waiting for shit to hit the fan before you take action is far too late.
How do drones operate for such a long time in an post-apocalyptic world? There won't be power or infrastructure to make sure these drones are long term. Or we just talking about the apocalypse as in, "Things went slightly downhill, but the government, resource pipelines, and everything else is basically intact". In which case there was no apocalypse.
I think you can let go of the idea that in a post-apocalyptic world that there will be enough infrastructure similar to The Maze Runner to operate and house an army.I imagine much the way a roomba backs up to it's charger. The smoldering husk is just fantasy, but to ignore the history of human tyranny is just farcical as well. Police snipers in Brazil are going full IDF on favelas right now. I'm not about to let my guard down simply because I lack the imagination for it.
But that's hard. Surely it'll just happen on its own once you've abolished the billionaires?I get what you're saying but you're then believing their paranoia. There's no need to prepare for things like rich people hording all the world's food because that's impossible. Or them getting robot guards. Or whatever fantasy apocalypse where they somehow retain all their status. It doesn't work that way, and people should actively ignore such paranoia and work on legit issues that will cascade like climate change, inequality, etc. Them fantasizing about how to retain power in an apocalypse is not on the radar.
I believe there will be resource wars regardless of some rich nerds think and that runaway climate change will incite some of these crises people associate with the apocalypse.I get what you're saying but you're then believing their paranoia. There's no need to prepare for things like rich people hording all the world's food because that's impossible. Or them getting robot guards. Or whatever fantasy apocalypse where they somehow retain all their status. It doesn't work that way, and people should actively ignore such paranoia and work on legit issues that will cascade like climate change, inequality, etc. Them fantasizing about how to retain power in an apocalypse is not on the radar.
Are you even reading my posts? I'm just gonna assume you're doing this on purpose and bite my finger at you.I think you can let go of the idea that in a post-apocalyptic world that there will be enough infrastructure similar to The Maze Runner to operate and house an army.
oh, but darling we're all hypocrites, hereWTF? No it won't. The United States doesn't represent the world. We will have a little effect in social influencing other countries when that happens but the way people are getting exploited is far more severe than here in the states and is at risk of violent uprisings once the tipping point of ecological change is reached.
Don't provide cover for hypocrites advocating for murder of the rich.
Silicon bodies are TIGHT. But then, if we could reproduce, all that scifi media using real racism allegory for fake racism might be relevant.
Because no one's ever been thrown under the bus, ever.If you're on the Titanic, and wanna survive, the smarter choice would be to make sure it doesn't hit that iceberg, instead of trying procure your own exclusive lifeboat. Just sayin'
I think he's indicting the rich people and not the critics here.
At this point can't we say that every rich person is at least tacitly a cryptofascist?
What the Samoyed was saying.I think he's indicting the rich people and not the critics here.
I would happily throw rich people under the Titanic-bus if it means getting averting the iceberg of climate change disaster.
In a world where wealth = power and the system of wealth acquisition is institutionally biased against non-whites, and capitalism is the consolidation of wealth, I think it does qualify as a strain of fascism.
In a world that's strictly meritocratic where everyone has the opportunity to become part of this class, since much of it is built on inequality, I do believe this class would cease to exist. Therefore, the only conclusion that can be drawn regarding those who promote and benefit from the status quo is that they're cryptofascists, and they are blind to even their own fasicistic impulses as they erroneously believe this (inequality to their benefit) is simply the normal state of things.That is how I'm thinking about it, too. And even if other factors, like race, were mitigated, it would seem that the rich would just have to create some other flimsy narrative about how their gross excess of power over the masses is natural or just or metaphysically necessary.
It's exactly like it this is surreal
In a world that's strictly meritocratic where everyone has the opportunity to become part of this class, since much of it is built on inequality, I do believe this class would cease to exist. Therefore, the only conclusion that can be drawn regarding those who promote and benefit from the status quo is that they're cryptofascists, and they are blind to even their own fasicistic impulses as they erroneously believe this (inequality to their benefit) is simply the normal state of things.
So... just for academic purposes what would peoples answers be to those questions?
ps3ud0 8)