I wanted to make this thread for a while actually, but I didn't really get the urge until I saw a tweet and that Time cover and really began to think....why is it the right way for these people protesting school shootings yet it was not the right way for Black Lives Matter protesters according to the media?
The media has framed these two protests very differently, across all avenues. The protests in regards to the school shootings, have been framed as positive, as a necessity(which they are), as the right way to protest in the walkouts and marches. As the way to actually make sure change is enacted. For the most part we can agree, that these are good, that having people my age protesting like this, is good and not really a negative. The media frames this as a courageous protest done by the youth, showcasing how our voices will be heard and we will not be silence.
Yet....with the media portrayal of Black Lives Matter protests things have been.....rocky to say the least. The things the media focuses on the most is not what the protests are about, how the protests were for the most part non-violent, but instead the media focused on when the protests got violent. Which was almost never because of the people originally their to protest another young black man or woman being killed by the police, but instead, by the police being very reactionary or outside people who were purposefully acting out to draw a reaction. Yet, the actual protests were non-violent. When they protest on highways, they move out of the way for ambulances, yet the media would have you believe they were brutal "Thugs" who were willing to let a person die when that was not the case. You had things such as Blue Lives Matter/All Lives Matter sprout from this, things the media kept pushing and pushing.
The media frames these two protests quite differently and all I really wanted to ask is...why?
Please keep it on topic or at least as close to these topics as possible
The media has framed these two protests very differently, across all avenues. The protests in regards to the school shootings, have been framed as positive, as a necessity(which they are), as the right way to protest in the walkouts and marches. As the way to actually make sure change is enacted. For the most part we can agree, that these are good, that having people my age protesting like this, is good and not really a negative. The media frames this as a courageous protest done by the youth, showcasing how our voices will be heard and we will not be silence.
Yet....with the media portrayal of Black Lives Matter protests things have been.....rocky to say the least. The things the media focuses on the most is not what the protests are about, how the protests were for the most part non-violent, but instead the media focused on when the protests got violent. Which was almost never because of the people originally their to protest another young black man or woman being killed by the police, but instead, by the police being very reactionary or outside people who were purposefully acting out to draw a reaction. Yet, the actual protests were non-violent. When they protest on highways, they move out of the way for ambulances, yet the media would have you believe they were brutal "Thugs" who were willing to let a person die when that was not the case. You had things such as Blue Lives Matter/All Lives Matter sprout from this, things the media kept pushing and pushing.
The media frames these two protests quite differently and all I really wanted to ask is...why?
Please keep it on topic or at least as close to these topics as possible