Warning users for dumb posts that are little more than dumb or mildly offensive would probably be the best move in some cases. Repeat offences can obviously mean someone isn't taking the hint. I've already seen some user was warned posts. That kind of transparency is a breath of fresh air here.
What I don't think is healthy is cultivating a dudebro attitude of celebrating bans. We're supposed to want to grow a community, not have a million skeletons. Yes, disciplinary action is sometimes needed and I've picked up bans in the past for mistakes. Sometimes people learn, other times it's heat of the moment mistakes.
Obvious trolling/shit-posting and really offensive shit can occasionally go right to see you later. As much as some people got adrenaline bursts or dopamine release seeing graveyards on another forum, I can't say it was always the most reasonable way to handle some of the more minor dumb remarks/derails/mistakes. I understand the idea behind a probation period for members but permanently nuking someone new for a mildly dumb port begging remark can sometimes be a bit OTT. Yes there are rules to read, and they should be mandatory reading, but moderation should always have a human element to it, not simply acting like AI.
I hope having many mods will help share duties around, as I don't think you need to be a psychologist to let many of the new faces know burnout leading to resentment can be a real thing being in a place of power. Especially around discipline. Other times it can go to people's heads, but again, having a big crew will hopefully mean that doesn't happen.
