Or maybe in BotW2 there's a light world/dark world dynamic but you're traveling between the two timelines :-oNintendo: Relive the events of the calamity
...NOT
*counts Animal Crossing cash*
Starting the rumor now that BotW2 takes place after this game's timeline and not the original BotW.
Last note that was hilarious to see is watching her attack mid air swinging the seal around to do damage.
This gameLast note that was hilarious to see is watching her attack mid air swinging the seal around to do damage.
I've only seen Revali use bomb and regular arrows too. But maybe both unlock and use others in combos. It does seem like Teba and Yunobo will probably be a lot more similar to their respective Champions than Riju or Sidon (though Sidon may also end up being pretty close, even with the extra spear).Based on what I saw:
Hestu - Summons Koroks around to help him attack, as well as using his Maracas to fight
Riju - Slides around with Patricia. Heard someone mentioned that she summons guards too but I didn't quite catch that
Teba - His ZR has him firing powerful shots instead. He seems to be not as quick as Revali, as well as seemingly not having the other types of arrows with him (I mostly see him with regular and bomb arrows, idk if that's the case for Revali too. Either way, they play different from each other)
Nintendo: Relive the events of the calamity
...NOT
*counts Animal Crossing cash*
Starting the rumor now that BotW2 takes place after this game's timeline and not the original BotW.
Hey I've been advocating this since the original reveal of time travelNintendo: Relive the events of the calamity
...NOT
*counts Animal Crossing cash*
Starting the rumor now that BotW2 takes place after this game's timeline and not the original BotW.
Everything sounds great to me. I can't for the life of me understand why anyone is getting mad at any of the shenanigans in the story, or caring the much about the Zelda story to begin with... to the point where some people are even saying they no longer have interest in even playing the game.
Maybe try this thing called... empathy?It's Musou. I don't get the rage. Yeah, marketing was vague or contradictory. But it's marketing. It's usually hyped up shit anyways. Come on now.
Instead, we're getting something that squashes that possibility. You really can't understand why someone might be disappointed?
It's disappointing, but some folks are being a little silly with the "false advertising" stuff. If the goal was to mislead then they really fucked up by releasing that demo. Not to mention that we all knew something was up right from the start with the little egg guardian around.Maybe try this thing called... empathy?
This was sold on the supposition that it'd flesh out a tragic story, which is a first for both Zelda and a musou. That sounded ambitious and exciting for people.
Instead, we're getting something that squashes that possibility. You really can't understand why someone might be disappointed?
Empathy? Are you kidding me? This is a video game, first of all. Second, the game isn't out yet, so it isn't a case of buying a product and feeling betrayed after playing it - nobody here has played it yet. Third, nobody here has played it yet, so they're upset about something that isn't even a sure thing yet. Fourth, this is Hyrule Warriors, a Musou game - so nobody knew what to expect from the story, but it would probably be silly given the long track record. Fifth, a Zelda game is never going to have a tragic ending. It's not happening, it has never happened, and people were kidding themselves if they thought otherwise. Sixth, buying into marketing hype and then finding out marketing hype is hype and getting upset is silly.Maybe try this thing called... empathy?
This was sold on the supposition that it'd flesh out a tragic story, which is a first for both Zelda and a musou. That sounded ambitious and exciting for people.
Instead, we're getting something that squashes that possibility. You really can't understand why someone might be disappointed?
This is also an important point that folks should keep in mind here.can we at least wait till we can be sure?
We don't have like half of the cutscenes avaliable yet.
This might sound crazy, but you can have empathy (definition: the ability to understand and share the feelings of another) for the dumb shit people care about as well as the big causes of life.Empathy? Are you kidding me? This is a video game, first of all. Second, the game isn't out yet, so it isn't a case of buying a product and feeling betrayed after playing it - nobody here has played it yet. Third, nobody here has played it yet, so they're upset about something that isn't even a sure thing yet. Fourth, this is Hyrule Warriors, a Musou game - so nobody knew what to expect from the story, but it would probably be silly given the long track record. Fifth, a Zelda game is never going to have a tragic ending. It's not happening, it has never happened, and people were kidding themselves if they thought otherwise. Sixth, buying into marketing hype and then finding out marketing hype is hype and getting upset is silly.
I'll save my empathy for causes that matter, not people disliking the story of a fucking video game that they haven't played yet. Get off your high horse.
I don't know why people think BOTW2 would take place in the timeline of a third party spinoff rather than the mainline game that it is explicitly stated to be a sequel to.
(And before anyone says it, AOC was never actually called a "prequel" by Nintendo. That's different from how they actually called BOTW2 "the sequel".)
Feels like I've walked back into FF7R discourse when its ending leaked out.
Same, lol. FF7R was glorious, both the game itself and the white-hot controversy it created. The Zelda fandom is going to tear itself apart once AoC comes out. Get the popcorn ready!
There will be reviews tomorrow. We might get a better answer thenI'm not gonna dig into this thread because while I don't mind story spoilers for zelda, character unlocks and mechanics I rather keep secret - all I really want to know is, does the full retail game perform like the demo? Or is it hopefully better?
Ah, good to hear then. Thanks!There will be reviews tomorrow. We might get a better answer then
disappointing to hear that they didn't give the game a "bad" ending
Same, lol. FF7R was glorious, both the game itself and the white-hot controversy it created. The Zelda fandom is going to tear itself apart once AoC comes out. Get the popcorn ready!
Also, this is totally canon. The publisher in Japan has nothing to do with whether it's canon. It starts in the BotW timeline and branches out to a separate timeline. Whether it will influence BotW2, tho, who knows.
It elevated the story to something amazing for me. The fact FF7R is actually a sequel rather than a remake, and one where maybe they can alter fate, has me incredibly excited to see what Part 2 does. :)FF7R's ending managed to make me entirely uninterested in a remake to my favourite FF game. Man fuck that ending.
This is 0% canon (or, no more canon than Linkle and Cia). Nothing that happens in AoC that wasn't previously mentioned in another Zelda game will never be referenced outside of a Hyrule Warriors game ever again.Same, lol. FF7R was glorious, both the game itself and the white-hot controversy it created. The Zelda fandom is going to tear itself apart once AoC comes out. Get the popcorn ready!
Also, this is totally canon. The publisher in Japan has nothing to do with whether it's canon. It starts in the BotW timeline and branches out to a separate timeline. Whether it will influence BotW2, tho, who knows.
The difference is that what happens in AoC is based heavily on what happens in BotW. It's tied to BotW's world and history and can be placed in a timeline, branching or not. Things happen in this game that are directly mentioned or shown in BotW. It is absolutely greater than 0% canon whether you like it or not.This is 0% canon (or, no more canon than Linkle and Cia). Nothing that happens in AoC that wasn't previously mentioned in another Zelda game will never be referenced outside of a Hyrule Warriors game ever again.
It's canon. AoC literally branches out of BotW's Calamity into a parallel timeline.This is 0% canon (or, no more canon than Linkle and Cia). Nothing that happens in AoC that wasn't previously mentioned in another Zelda game will never be referenced outside of a Hyrule Warriors game ever again.
Exactly. Like I know I've been saying I wanted to stick to the established story but it's still canon unless you wanna call Zelda games in certain branches in the timeline uncanonIt's canon. AoC literally branches out of BotW's Calamity into a parallel timeline.
The difference is that what happens in AoC is based heavily on what happens in BotW. It's tied to BotW's world and history and can be placed in a timeline, branching or not. Things happen in this game that are directly mentioned or shown in BotW. It is absolutely greater than 0% canon whether you like it or not.
What? That doesn't make it canon.It's canon. AoC literally branches out of BotW's Calamity into a parallel timeline.
There's an interesting discussion here to be had on story telling and the nature of "canon". On one hand if a story is set in this world then it should be automatically canon regardless of whether is contradicts previous information or not. Especially if the creator's say that it is. On the other hand, if new information from this game is never referenced by newer games or is even contradicted by other games then it's canonicity doesn't really matter. Like, if this game has a happy ending that BotW and BotW 2 both say did not happen then the game isn't actually any different from a non-canon game in it's impact on the story.The difference is that what happens in AoC is based heavily on what happens in BotW. It's tied to BotW's world and history and can be placed in a timeline, branching or not. Things happen in this game that are directly mentioned or shown in BotW. It is absolutely greater than 0% canon whether you like it or not.
Yeah I feel that too. I just think that even if they change things they're working within the framework of BotW's story. Especially in a series like Zelda, where games can be in separate timelines from eachother and all be considered canon, it's weird to say AoC is not canon whatsoever when you can pinpoint when it takes place and similar events play out.There's an interesting discussion here to be had on story telling and the nature of "canon". On one hand if a story is set in this world then it should be automatically canon regardless of whether is contradicts previous information or not. Especially if the creator's say that it is. On the other hand, if new information from this game is never referenced by newer games or is even contradicted by other games then it's canonicity doesn't really matter. Like, if this game has a happy ending that BotW and BotW 2 both say did not happen then the game isn't actually any different from a non-canon game in it's impact on the story.
I guess this is a long way of saying that canon is just a made up term that doesn't really mean anything.
The idea is this game occupies a separate but still canonical timeline. Think Wind Waker and Twilight Princess. TWW is in a timeline with a "bad ending" where Hyrule flooded. TP is in a timeline with a "good ending" where there was no flood. Both timelines are offshoots of OoT. Both are canon. Likewise, here in AoC, AoC starts in BotW's past but then branches into a separate timeline where things can follow a different track.There's an interesting discussion here to be had on story telling and the nature of "canon". On one hand if a story is set in this world then it should be automatically canon regardless of whether is contradicts previous information or not. Especially if the creator's say that it is. On the other hand, if new information from this game is never referenced by newer games or is even contradicted by other games then it's canonicity doesn't really matter. Like, if this game has a happy ending that BotW and BotW 2 both say did not happen then the game isn't actually any different from a non-canon game in it's impact on the story.
I guess this is a long way of saying that canon is just a made up term that doesn't really mean anything.
Yeah even if they don't capitalize on it and make a game that continues AoC's ending, it's still the same caseThe idea is this game occupies a separate but still canonical timeline. Think Wind Waker and Twilight Princess. TWW is in a timeline with a "bad ending" where Hyrule flooded. TP is in a timeline with a "good ending" where there was no flood. Both timelines are offshoots of OoT. Both are canon. Likewise, here in AoC, AoC starts in BotW's past but then branches into a separate timeline where things can follow a different track.
It's a weird concept. I never took it seriously. Anything that has an implied place and time it's relevant, other timeline or not. It's too strictly applied and not really that deep. The things that aren't canon are ones that don't try to be in the first place like HW1 or Smash.