I'm not advocating for violence. I'm saying that claiming that 'violence is never the answer' is objectively wrong and shows an extreme denial of how history has actually -gone-.
Violence is the nuclear option. I wish it didn't have to happen, but
well, riots are the the language of the unheard. Sometimes, regrettably, violence IS the only answer.
And way to strawman again, lol. I don't know what's 'edgy' about saying that I can't judge someone for getting angry and attacking someone baring a symbol that represents an attack on their being. It isn't the -ideal- solution. I'm not 'advocating' for punching the guy in the head.
But if he were to get punched he literally got the reaction he intended to get from this..
If you talk shit, or wear a symbol representing hate, and you get hit, well, they -actively- provoked someone, so I've got approx zero pity for them.
Whether it's justified or not is completely irrelevant to anything I'm saying. The point is that he literally -was- provoking people.