I'm actually personally a fan of "Series X" as a name for multiple reasons:
One of the most catastrophic mistakes in branding the Wii U that Nintendo made was going with a console name that wasn't obviously denoting a new, improved console. "Wii U" could mean anything; in fact, given that we had received a tablet peripheral for the Wii called "uTab", and that the Wii U's central push was on the tablet controller, the confusion surrounding the status of the Wii U - with many, if not most, confusing it as a new peripheral for the existing Wii console - was almost inevitable in hindsight.
But it's been pointed out to me that the exact same could apply to the Xbox Series X as well. Because here we are with a name that's a non-obvious name as far as denoting a new improvement goes (it could just as well reference a line of special edition consoles, lol), a name for a console that is being explicitly pushed on the back of its power that is remarkably similar to the name of Microsoft's previous console, which was pushed on the back of power... and you can see branding confusion inevitably arising. The average parent or grandparent who go to GameStop or Best Buy, asking for "the Xbox X", and then getting flummoxed when it turns out there are two of them, and it's not actually immediately obvious which one their child or grandchild may have asked for ("it plays the new Halo game." "Well, both of them play the new Halo game.")
I think as cool as the name is, and as much as I like it, it may be a branding misstep... which says more about the intelligence of the average consumer than anything else, to be clear, but here we are.
What do you think?
- It works in a post-iPhone world
- It conveys a family of devices better than past console names have
- It sounds marketable because it's "cool"
One of the most catastrophic mistakes in branding the Wii U that Nintendo made was going with a console name that wasn't obviously denoting a new, improved console. "Wii U" could mean anything; in fact, given that we had received a tablet peripheral for the Wii called "uTab", and that the Wii U's central push was on the tablet controller, the confusion surrounding the status of the Wii U - with many, if not most, confusing it as a new peripheral for the existing Wii console - was almost inevitable in hindsight.
But it's been pointed out to me that the exact same could apply to the Xbox Series X as well. Because here we are with a name that's a non-obvious name as far as denoting a new improvement goes (it could just as well reference a line of special edition consoles, lol), a name for a console that is being explicitly pushed on the back of its power that is remarkably similar to the name of Microsoft's previous console, which was pushed on the back of power... and you can see branding confusion inevitably arising. The average parent or grandparent who go to GameStop or Best Buy, asking for "the Xbox X", and then getting flummoxed when it turns out there are two of them, and it's not actually immediately obvious which one their child or grandchild may have asked for ("it plays the new Halo game." "Well, both of them play the new Halo game.")
I think as cool as the name is, and as much as I like it, it may be a branding misstep... which says more about the intelligence of the average consumer than anything else, to be clear, but here we are.
What do you think?