Ironic that you'd say that lol.
Both of you are making Phantom Thief proud.
Ironic that you'd say that lol.
I Tremble at the thought.Ironic that you'd say that lol.
Both of you are making Phantom Thief proud.
Playstation brand is stronger than ever. With Xbox slowly retreating from the hardware fight, NIntendo remains the only real competitor. Unless Phil Harrison is launching PS5, next gen is a lock.
Literally no one said it's luck.Having the best exclusives gen after gen after gen after gen.. you know that's not luck my dudes
How can you say that after the nonsense we went through with Destiny and Call of Duty this gen as well as tying down Kojima, hyping up the FF7 remake five years prior to release as a launch exclusive and then locking SFV down as a console exclusive?OP, the PS4 launched in a very bad position. Sony's first party was struggling and the losses from the PS3/other Sony divisions were still keeping the company looking bloodied and battered even a couple of years after they were experiencing the initial success of the PS4. It took several years later of record breaking profit to get them back into the prime of PlayStation. And that's where they are as they are counting down to when they can reveal the PS5.
Sony didn't have to break much of a sweat to get to this position. They hardly moved the PS4's price, rarely relied on third party deals, and focused on growing their first party studios. Imagine if they are backed into a corner during the PS5 era? They have the money now to make some huge moves to gain momentum if necessary. Not only that, but several of their first party games are among the most anticipated across all next gen consoles.
I think they will dominate the way they did with the PS5 the same way they did with the PS4, but it will be more costly on them. That's about it.
This statement is complete hindsight, though. This is not how it appeared in 2013. Even with fan complaints, journalists were largely positive on Xbox One restrictions. The Wii U was looking slow, but to call it no competition woudl've been a huge stretch.I don't think that will happen, and there's a very basic and simple reason as to why: the PS4 had the benefit of launching in a market with no viable competition.
Don Mattrick was a once in a life time talent. We may never see the like of him again.
Why not? If we look at the situation at the end of last gen Microsoft was in a much much better position than they are now. The 360 was a successful console almost worldwide, rivaling if not beating the PS3 in several markets. The Xbox One on the other hand is dead in the water outside of the US and UK, sales are at rock bottom (apart from some SAD firesales). On top of that you don´t even need the console to play Microsofts games anymore.
The market fundamentals haven't really changed though globally, XBOX is really strong in the USA and competing in a few Western Europe markets, but everywhere else they've made no progress at all. There are so many markets where Sony just dominates, and most of these are the ones that will provide the future growth in the market, so I don't think they have anything to worry about.
I actually don't think it's going to sell as good as the switch launch aligned but it will be closeI feel like PlayStation 5 will be the leading console of its generation, for a whole variety of reasons that at this point are well trodden territory:
However, there is a difference between being the leading console (which PS5 will be) and being the dominant console (which PS4 was earlier in the gen), and on ResetEra, I often see a lot of people expecting PS5 to replicate the kind of immense and utter large scale market domination the PS4 exercised earlier in the gen.
- PlayStation brand power
- Sony's marketing and logistical infrastructure in major markets around the world
- Sony's head start over Microsoft when it comes to great compelling exclusives that people will buy their console for
- Sony's grasp over the console market, that has just ensured that they have not had a true failure in the console market yet
I don't think that will happen, and there's a very basic and simple reason as to why: the PS4 had the benefit of launching in a market with no viable competition. Nintendo completely face planted with the biggest mainstream failure in console history, while Microsoft suffered from the worst messaging and marketing debacle in the console market of all time, which continues to plague Xbox One to this day. Sony had a clear field, the entire console market to themselves, for all practical purposes - and this, combined with their inherent strengths and advantages (as outlined above) led to the kind of utter domination we saw in the early years.
This is not to say that Sony got "lucky", or that they only won because the competition messed up. To reiterate (for the third time), Sony played their hand perfectly, and they were always going to win, no matter what, on the sheer inherent strength they have built up over the last two decades. I'm not handwaving their success as luck - I am saying the extent of their success definitely was influenced by the non-existence of any meaningful competition in the market at the time.
The PS5 launches in a vastly different market. Nintendo is resurgent, and has reasserted itself as a top seller with market-appealing exclusives. More importantly (in terms of direct competition), Xbox is in a far better position now than it was at the start of the generation. Microsoft has carefully studied its mistakes and put in the legwork to try and address the problems that took it down earlier this generation: they have purchased studios to bolster their first party, they have valuable offerings like Game Pass, plus initiatives like Play Anywhere amd BC to counter the image of them being "anti consumer"; even if Xbox ends up not doing well outside the anglosphere, in the Anglosphere, it will end up doing far better than the Xbox One did - and that success will obviously come at the expense of the PS5.
I still expect PS5 to "win" the generation in total - but I do think it won't outsell the competition as much as the PS4 did. i think a stronger Xbox will lead to Xbox clawing back some marketshare from PlayStation - enough that PS5 won't be dominant like the PS4 was (even though it will be the leader).
The Xbox One didn't bomb. I think it's obvious PS5 will be the leader at the start. Only time will tell how the generation ends.We cannot possibly know this though. We can predict that it might be, but people said the Xbox One would be just as good as the 360 and then it bombed. I'm not saying I think the PS5 will, but I think it's a bit early to say which one is going to be the leading console.
Xbox has expanded beyond consoles. Judging next gen solely by who sold the most consoles will be outdated.I dunno, they still have all the best exclusives, at least IMO. And with Microsoft putting out pretty much everything on PC these days I just don't see the point in owning an Xbox. Unless the new Xbox is massively better spec'd and runs all multiplats better then I just don't see Sony losing.
We know so little about next gen I don't know that we can definitively expect anything either way. Not sure what more there is to discuss outside of fairly baseless speculation.
+1Ps4 wasn't the dominating console "earlier in the gen" it is still. It sells more than Xbox and just recently fell behind switch, which makes sense 6 years into a gen. It's past 100M and on track to end up 120-130M. It's selling like 15M+ per year in lower years.
Could Xbox have a 360 level comback? Sure. But the European and Japanese markets are very different than 2005-10, so there are very few viable pathes to that outside of Sony fucking up tremendously.
ps4 has literally been 2.5 times ahead of Xbox the whole gen In terms "dominating" the market.That could change but atm there's nothing to indicate it will.
no rumors of "no used games" or anything like for PS5, no reason to think that will change until something happens. If anything, Lockhart is the riskiest rumor and that's Xbox. Could be huge, middling, or a dud
How can you say that after the nonsense we went through with Destiny and Call of Duty this gen as well as tying down Kojima, hyping up the FF7 remake five years prior to release as a launch exclusive and then locking SFV down as a console exclusive?
Sony was very aggressive with third party deals this time around.
It hasn't been dominant in three years.Ps4 wasn't the dominating console "earlier in the gen" it is still.
No kidding.
The Xbox One didn't bomb. I think it's obvious PS5 will be the leader at the start. Only time will tell how the generation ends.
No it won't. A sale is a sale, whether it's a sub or a hardware purchase. If a business wants to report MAU's then fair enough but as long as hardware is being sold numbers will keep getting reported. Unless your getting soundly beaten of course where numbers could effect your brand image.Xbox has expanded beyond consoles. Judging next gen solely by who sold the most consoles will be outdated.
So it was disappointing, but it didn't bomb. The Wii U bombed.In overall sales? Totally. They lead early and then were monumentally outpaced by Sony. If they hadn't, they would still be publishing sales numbers of the console.
I'm not saying Microsoft didn't do it but let's not pretend there weren't some falls where Sony had no heavy hitter first party games and relied heavily on Destiny and CoD exclusives and marketing.How is that relying on third party deals? Did you miss the Xbox 360 days where most major third party games had some form of exclusive content? Sony is guilty of resorting to the same tactics, but not to that extent. They clearly invested in their first party more than anything giving most their teams huge budgets and as many years as needed to create their games.
It's actually more, if you go to the 10th you get a prompt to see even older results lol.
So it was disappointing, but it didn't bomb. The Wii U bombed.
Software is what matters to me, but I have more faith in Sony to deliver still.