Yeah that's definitely me. I only ever go in there if I feel something is off during playtime, otherwise I assume author's intent and go ahead. If nothing bothers me then I'm all good.
ah, that's good then
What? Criticizing the proof is absolutely on-point, the entire fucking point of an editor is quality control.
The solution is a large frame of reference (cockpit or different trick) or tying movement 1:1 with hand input someway. I think thats it.
Are you saying that this review wasn't an opinion? Because it pretty much seems emblematic of that, for better or worse.
Those mistakes are like VR gaming 101, you always check for comfort settings before playing. You can argue that he's new to whole VR but why let him review this.
Precisely.
These are terrible posts and you both should feel bad for taking the effort to write such dumb posts
I think IGN replaced their editors with the "Post Story" button, because it sure as hell seems like that's the only thing between draft and published article.
Why should such a large site get a break when they fuck up often?
And they pulled the review when they realised their mistakes. Shit happens, whether you are large company or a small one. It's all people at the end of the day.
The review should have never been posted. I have higher expectations from the largest site than I do for smaller sites. More people should equal less fuck ups.
