Hopefully he put more effort into this than his last video or else I'll start posting "why does he get his own thread?" each time a new one pops up.
Yup, watching it now and it's much better.
Hopefully he put more effort into this than his last video or else I'll start posting "why does he get his own thread?" each time a new one pops up.
https://youtu.be/zBDJ5bethYY https://nintendowire.com/news/2017/06/22/e3-fire-emblem-warriors-impressions/ read the article while watching the video... a trippy experience
Actually, people found out that he was called out for it in the comments multiple times pre-ign era, but at the time he was a complete nobody with like less than 50k subs, so no one cared. Nobodies steal, reupload and do that stuff all the time, cuz they are nobodies.
The thing is, nobody made a stink out of it. There were like a few comments in the comment section and that's it. It took people so much longer to find any of those than it did to just find examples of his plagiarism directly.
The problem here is something people like H.Bomber guy talked about, is that there needs to be a culture of pointing out plagiarism and not letting it fester. A couple of people posting a comment "good job stealing the video from "x" " and then moving on with their life, feeling fulfilled in the fact that they 'showed that guy", is just not enough. It got burried and person almost made a career out of it.
Hell, often these comments indicate some level of ignorance (the Evil Dead remake being heavily criticized for copying The Cabin in the Woods is a solid example of that) on part of the person making them. So yeah, a stray comment is going to be ignored.
He's a bit LTTP but this is a good video summary of the stuff that was discovered he stole. I liked him showing the video along with the written text. I'm sure he got the list here.
Could he really do that though? I mean, the internet is not going to forget this, er… the internet isn't going to let him think that they forgot about this. I'm sure on every video he tries to upload in the future, there will be a lot of comments referencing plagiarism. I think it's already happening with non-Filip IGN videos. He could always prune those comments though, I guess.So I guess he's just opting to keep his head down and wait until this all blows over before I presume returning to YouTube and pretending everything is fine with another cool Switch video
He probably could gain subscribers by turning his channel into a game. Try to find who he plagiarized in the video and get a small prize.People are saying he could go back to youtube? He had 60k subs before this which is nowhere near enough money to live on. I mean he quickly left for a low paying IGN position.
60k subs is a hobby that probably costs more than it brings in.
The thing is, nobody made a stink out of it. There were like a few comments in the comment section and that's it. It took people so much longer to find any of those than it did to just find examples of his plagiarism directly.
The problem here is something people like H.Bomber guy talked about, is that there needs to be a culture of pointing out plagiarism and not letting it fester. A couple of people posting a comment "good job stealing the video from "x" " and then moving on with their life, feeling fulfilled in the fact that they 'showed that guy", is just not enough. It got burried and person almost made a career out of it.
That was never a good a thing tho, just a blindspot.In regard to whether this should have been caught by IGN or not, I do not think the expectation of any Editor would be that they'd been given stolen copy from one of their writers and check accordingly. It's simply not what the Editor does and is far from their primary function.
A good Editor would assess the material for structure, brevity and being on point in a concise manner. They look to pare down and trim writer flourish, ensure clarity and get the article within scope. There would be no thoughts of the material being lifted or its veracity.
Ideally a system to ensure this does not happen again would be wonderful but for now media outlets such as IGN rely on the moral integrity of the people they employ to retain standards.
Thanks to Miucin, the gaming press now live in a darker world where every turned in article is given a slightly longer look and writers in that field feel all the more under pressure and scrutinised.
Hopefully the aftershock does not linger too long.
He has some video editing skills so that may be an avenue worth exploring, hard(er) to do plagiarizing there. ;) Anything new he puts on his current or new channel will get the attention and the clicks, but not the money from the patrons or the view time (most people will pop for a second to downvote or leave an aggressive comment).The day he uploads anything new, it'll be getting a bunch of attention. Either he makes a new channel and stays off camera or just look for a career doing something else entirely.
I would say part of this issue was definitely on IGN to do proper vetting for an editor before they took him on.So this is me more being out of sheer curiosity than anything, but does IGN have to take a bit of the blame as well? Miucin is a piece of shit no question, but based on what I'm seeing, It would really just take a couple of quick web searches for an editor to see that his work was almost entirely plagiarized.
The past couple days it seemed the trail had grown a bit cold, but there's a few more questionable examples that have been found. Anybody read these, yet?
For these news articles he wrote on Warframe and The Gardens Between Us, merely a month ago, he copied direct words from their press releases for sections of his articles
Specifically for Gardens he writes:
The press release:
For Warframe he writes:
Excerpts from the press release here:
Filip's tendency to reorder the the sentences and phrases while copying the exact words are completely apparent in these two cases. Especially with the Gardens Between Us where he copied the descriptions from the press release almost word for word but mashed them into a single paragraph where otherwise those individual sentences were in separate paragraphs.
It really convinces me more that he doesn't understand plagiarism and thought the effort in slightly rephrasing and reordering the ideas amounted to original work. Again, it seems like a lot of effort for simply restating someone else's words.
There was another article that was a bit doubtful involving Capcom's article on cloud services and citing The Wall Street Journal.
Of course, I wouldn't be too far from Filip if I didn't cite the source of all this, but it is more than a bit of a dubious one.
Works cited:
KotakuinAction, which I myself found when visiting IGN's reddit page, though the information KinA found seems to be accurate
I give the guy credit for not going into the "SJW are out to get me" turn so many people lean into when fucking up
Haha, indeed.If others have done that, he might, he just needs to stumble across someone he can copy first
The sentiment in the article is exactly the same, only mine came out a month and a half earlier. I'm not asserting plagiarism but this feels wrong and I've been too afraid to say anything until now. Ideas can't be trademarked, but this feels too close for comfort.
Respectfully, I do not think this rises to the level of plagiarism. I also think that this exemplifies why Filip got away with it for so long. It's very common for multiple articles from videogame outlets to present the exact same idea. You could probably find a Resetera thread making the same claim.I can't make a new thread because I don't have 100 posts. But I have friends in the industry I showed this to long before the Miucin controversy right after I noticed it. I think IGN ripped one of my articles off a month after the fact. And I'm not just trying to capitalize on what's going on. I'm not saying I was plagiarized per se, but, the idea is identical and the same feature image is even used. I first saw it on the app and screenshotted it but was afraid to say anything. My original article did very well for itself.
I had to take a break for the last month from my outlet due to a family matter but here are some comparisons. Theirs was during E3 so by nature, the words were different but the idea was the same. I did take it a step further though and brought Sony into it; IGN did not.
The sentiment in the article is exactly the same, only mine came out a month and a half earlier. I'm not asserting plagiarism but this feels wrong and I've been too afraid to say anything until now. Ideas can't be trademarked, but this feels too close for comfort.
Here are some examples.
I can't make a new thread because I don't have 100 posts. But I have friends in the industry I showed this to long before the Miucin controversy right after I noticed it. I think IGN ripped one of my articles off a month after the fact. And I'm not just trying to capitalize on what's going on. I'm not saying I was plagiarized per se, but, the idea is identical and the same feature image is even used. I first saw it on the app and screenshotted it but was afraid to say anything. My original article did very well for itself.
I had to take a break for the last month from my outlet due to a family matter but here are some comparisons. Theirs was during E3 so by nature, the words were different but the idea was the same. I did take it a step further though and brought Sony into it; IGN did not.
The sentiment in the article is exactly the same, only mine came out a month and a half earlier. I'm not asserting plagiarism but this feels wrong and I've been too afraid to say anything until now. Ideas can't be trademarked, but this feels too close for comfort.
Here are some examples.
Yeah someone already mentioned it but with respect that's not an uncommon viewpoint. Especially as it followed a number of long term MS business moves for gaming. Even when I saw the article in question come up my main thought was 'well no shit, they're certainly not playing the short game'.I can't make a new thread because I don't have 100 posts. But I have friends in the industry I showed this to long before the Miucin controversy right after I noticed it. I think IGN ripped one of my articles off a month after the fact. And I'm not just trying to capitalize on what's going on. I'm not saying I was plagiarized per se, but, the idea is identical and the same feature image is even used. I first saw it on the app and screenshotted it but was afraid to say anything. My original article did very well for itself.
I had to take a break for the last month from my outlet due to a family matter but here are some comparisons. Theirs was during E3 so by nature, the words were different but the idea was the same. I did take it a step further though and brought Sony into it; IGN did not.
The sentiment in the article is exactly the same, only mine came out a month and a half earlier. I'm not asserting plagiarism but this feels wrong and I've been too afraid to say anything until now. Ideas can't be trademarked, but this feels too close for comfort.
Here are some examples.
IGN should take down the article while they investigate, I think. It could be plagiarism. Otherwise it gives the impression that a junior employee they already wanted to leave received extra scrutiny over a cherished senior one.
IGN should take down the article while they investigate, I think. It could be plagiarism. Otherwise it gives the impression that a junior employee they already wanted to leave received extra scrutiny over a cherished senior one.
Sorry dude, writing about the same thing, is not the same as copying your work. "Playing the long game" is a really common turn of phrase, especially when describing Microsoft's video game plan.
Unless you were plagiarizing this article posted a day before yours:
Wow.
Ok I never asserted plagiarism. I come from a research background I know exactly what it is.
It's a month apart, asserts similar language, and I know thoughts aren't trademarked nor should they be. But same feature image. Same assertion. It's the timing that's weird. If they were inspired by my own work they should just hire me then.
But in all honesty I never claimed I was plagiarized so please don't put words in my mouth. Nor do I think an investigation is really needed. It is what it is. But many of the arguments here are full of logical fallacies. I actually like IGN so I'm not doing this to shit on them.
Thank you.
Wow.
Ok I never asserted plagiarism. I come from a research background I know exactly what it is.
It's a month apart, asserts similar language, and I know thoughts aren't trademarked nor should they be. But same feature image. Same assertion. It's the timing that's weird. If they were inspired by my own work they should just hire me then.
But in all honesty I never claimed I was plagiarized so please don't put words in my mouth. Nor do I think an investigation is really needed. It is what it is. But many of the arguments here are full of logical fallacies. I actually like IGN so I'm not doing this to shit on them.
Thank you.
If they were inspired by my own work they should just hire me then.
So much cringe in this post I don't even know where to begin.Wow.
Ok I never asserted plagiarism. I come from a research background I know exactly what it is.
It's a month apart, asserts similar language, and I know thoughts aren't trademarked nor should they be. But same feature image. Same assertion. It's the timing that's weird. If they were inspired by my own work they should just hire me then.
But in all honesty I never claimed I was plagiarized so please don't put words in my mouth. Nor do I think an investigation is really needed. It is what it is. But many of the arguments here are full of logical fallacies. I actually like IGN so I'm not doing this to shit on them.
Thank you.
Wow.
Ok I never asserted plagiarism. I come from a research background I know exactly what it is.
It's a month apart, asserts similar language, and I know thoughts aren't trademarked nor should they be. But same feature image. Same assertion. It's the timing that's weird. If they were inspired by my own work they should just hire me then.
But in all honesty I never claimed I was plagiarized so please don't put words in my mouth. Nor do I think an investigation is really needed. It is what it is. But many of the arguments here are full of logical fallacies. I actually like IGN so I'm not doing this to shit on them.
Thank you.
Much more to it than that if you look at the context which is identical only mine was a month and a half before e3