Never forget: Hitler made children happy.
Wish this whole controversy could be dropped because Brie Larson has been amazing in everything I've seen her in since Scott Pilgrim.
I'd respond properly, but I don't care about your opinion.
See how arrogant that sounds?
Are people actually arguing that they're alt-right though? All I see from them are shitty takes that seem to draw in those kinds of crowds even if they don't identify with it themselves.I get that RLM have made some questionable off-hand comments over the years, but the fervor with which some people insist on trying to create a narrative of them as alt-right adjacent or something is incredibly persistent and I've never considered them anything but mostly anti-corporate liberal-ish people who don't care much about politics. If anything, their insistence on trying to remain "apolitical" as much as possible is much worse than them trying to appear as centrists - and in any case, all they usually say in these situations is "Stop fucking giving accolades to mega-corporations for their superficial wokeness" which is more or less the thrust of the most recent hbomberguy video that got next to no play here because what some people hate more than anything is being told "consumption isn't activism, and actually consumerism is bad."
The way people have morphed "they commented on it briefly in a much larger review of the film" into "they went on for an extended period ranting about it!" really exaggerates what actually occurred.
RLM brings em out
He also loved dogs. Clearly Obama is Hitler confirmed. Gotcha liberals!
A review is not important because of the score it gives.Their review was problematic and certainly not one of their best, but I agree that the idea that diversity is needed in film review is a bit ridiculous. Films with minority stars such as Get Out (and now Us), Black Panther, Moonlight and others all received excellent reviews. And the idea that adult reviewers would give kids films bad review, well look at Pixar reviews. Where they need diversity is in Oscar selection and other award shows. The Oscars tend to pick safe films and have an obsession with white saviors (see the Blind Side or the problematic Green Book), whereas reviewers on the RT average tend to like daring films more. Not to say there are no problems with reviewers or RT and other aggregators, it's just that lack of diversity doesn't seem to be causing these problems.
I mean it's a YA movie with a black lead, not to say white guy opinions shouldn't be heard but it's understandable that she finds more value in the opinions of those who are the target audience and are directly impacted by representation.Like, what does that even mean it wasn't made for them? Is A Wrinkle in Time about the black experience in America or something? How was it not made for 40 yr old male audience members?
I agree, bunch of hacks.You know it's funny that these guys are frequently referenced(or at least used to be)for their film opinions like were suoposed to take then seriously as critics.
But when someone calls them out on a shitty take it's satire.
You could say the same thing about The Last Jedi. Rey is a white female, Finn is a black male, Rose is a Vietnamese female. Should Rian Johnson give a shit about your opinion of that movie since you're not any of those?I mean it's a YA movie with a black lead, not to say white guy opinions shouldn't be heard but it's understandable that she finds more value in the opinions of those who are the target audience and are directly impacted by representation.
It's the CinemaSin's paradox.You know it's funny that these guys are frequently referenced(or at least used to be)for their film opinions like were suoposed to take then seriously as critics.
But when someone calls them out on a shitty take it's satire.
One thing that she has done with regards to having more women and PoC participate in the Captain Marvel press junket is to request for women to be sent to interview/photograph her.
I don't know about what she did in the countries she visited but for Singapore her host for the press conferences here was hosted by a woman. She personally contacted a local female photographer through instagram to help her take offical press photos so that she can give this young photographer exposure. Maybe she also did the same in other countries.
Is the movie targeting these demographics specifically?You could say the same thing about The Last Jedi. Rey is a white female, Finn is a black male, Rose is a Vietnamese female. Should Rian Johnson give a shit about your opinion of that movie since you're not any of those?
You could say the same thing about The Last Jedi. Rey is a white female, Finn is a black male, Rose is a Vietnamese female. Should Rian Johnson give a shit about your opinion of that movie since you're not any of those?
Uhh yes? How is it not? Unless you believe Disney isn't attempting to expand the appeal of SW by casting a female lead and POC in support roles?
And it's not targeting white male audience at all?
SW is a franchise built on a foundation of white men (look at who made it and who stared in the OT). They grew up with it and rooted on a white male. There's nothing wrong with that, but it's apples/oranges in comparison to A Wrinkle. Luckily, representation has improved drastically with the ST.You could say the same thing about The Last Jedi. Rey is a white female, Finn is a black male, Rose is a Vietnamese female. Should Rian Johnson give a shit about your opinion of that movie since you're not any of those?
You could say the same thing about The Last Jedi. Rey is a white female, Finn is a black male, Rose is a Vietnamese female. Should Rian Johnson give a shit about your opinion of that movie since you're not any of those?
It was my main takeaway from all that WWII drama.
As a white guy I'm completely comfortable in saying white guys are the driving force behind the worst of SW conversation.Looking at the response of TLJ in some areas of the internet?
Absolutely.
The actress who played Rose was forced off of social media because of entitled, white nerds.
Looking at the response of TLJ in some areas of the internet?
Absolutely.
The actress who played Rose was forced off of social media because of entitled, white nerds.
Totally agree with that.As a white guy I'm completely comfortable in saying white guys are the driving force behind the worst of SW conversation.
Source?Of course it is but so is Captain Marvel LOL. It had majority male viewership opening weekend.
That's veering off topic but aggregate scores are bad and should really not be used to begin with.Yeah, but people nowadays seem to be reading reviews less and focusing more on aggregate film scores and scores from their favorite reviewers. So I don't think minority filmmakers are at a disadvantage when it comes to review and RT scores, and that reviewers can still be objective about their films despite lacking diversity, but of course diversity is always a good thing to bring in new perspectives and analysis of films.
It's not particularly controversial to say that an old white guy's take about the Harry Potter books isn't particularly interesting.
Also see the Ghostbusters stuff where they claimed that the "controversy" surrounding the movie, which included Leslie Jones getting temporarily harassed off of Twitter, was just something played up by Sony Pictures to advertise the movies.
Would it really change much? As it is I find their critic of the movie itself pretty fair and their arguments have nothing to do with the surrounding controversy.
It's not particularly controversial to say that an old white guy's take about the Harry Potter books isn't particularly interesting.
Would it really change much? As it is I find their critic of the movie itself pretty fair and their arguments have nothing to do with the surrounding controversy.
Interestingly, 55 percent to 58 percent of ticket buyers were male (that compares with 52 percent on Wonder Woman's opening weekend). The audience was also diverse (48 percent Caucasian, 20 percent Hispanic, 17 percent African-American and 15 percent Asian/Other).
My point is that it's very likely that this person will miss what makes Harry Potter special.An old white guy's take on Harry Potter, while more than likely to be uninteresting, is not by virtue of his race, gender, and age inherently uninteresting.
An old white guy's take on Harry Potter, while more than likely to be uninteresting, is not by virtue of his race, gender, and age inherently uninteresting.
True but it's target is squarely on kids which was my point.To be fair, HP is one of the most incredibly white ass franchises in literature history.
While interesting that doesn't tell the whole picture, we kind of need the breakdown for other Marvel properties to see if it's not just Marvel movies having that effect on the split.
What?True but it's target is squarely on kids which was my point.
While interesting that doesn't tell the whole picture, we kind of need the breakdown for other Marvel properties to see if it's not just Marvel movies having that effect on the split.
If Infinity War has a 70/30 breakdown, the CM breakdown of 52/48 is actually significant of Marvel courting women over men.
My point is that it's very likely that this person will miss what makes Harry Potter special.
Don't believe me? Just look at how the media talked about Harry Potter before the movie deals happened.
It's really really uninteresting.
Of course a good literary critic (which I don't believe there are that many) would be able to make abstraction to that fact to make for an interesting read at least.
I mean, racism and sexism got old like 400 years ago, but I apologize if the last 24 months or so have been difficult for you.
Not at all.I totally agree with your point. I apologize for misunderstanding your stance; I thought you were making an essentialist argument.
And he was really really white.Updike was also a critic of literature and art, one frequently cited as one of the best American critics of his generation.[45] In the introduction to Picked-Up Pieces, his 1975 collection of prose, he listed his personal rules for literary criticism:
1. Try to understand what the author wished to do, and do not blame him for not achieving what he did not attempt.
2. Give enough direct quotation—at least one extended passage—of the book's prose so the review's reader can form his own impression, can get his own taste.3. Confirm your description of the book with quotation from the book, if only phrase-long, rather than proceeding by fuzzy précis.4. Go easy on plot summary, and do not give away the ending.5. If the book is judged deficient, cite a successful example along the same lines, from the author's œuvre or elsewhere. Try to understand the failure. Sure it's his and not yours?To these concrete five might be added a vaguer sixth, having to do with maintaining a chemical purity in the reaction between product and appraiser. Do not accept for review a book you are predisposed to dislike, or committed by friendship to like. Do not imagine yourself a caretaker of any tradition, an enforcer of any party standards, a warrior in any ideological battle, a corrections officer of any kind. Never, never ... try to put the author "in his place," making of him a pawn in a contest with other reviewers. Review the book, not the reputation. Submit to whatever spell, weak or strong, is being cast. Better to praise and share than blame and ban. The communion between reviewer and his public is based upon the presumption of certain possible joys of reading, and all our discriminations should curve toward that end.
No one is talking about the real hit piece on this video. Milwaukee was absolutely savaged.
According to the video, they are too drunk to do it.I'm surprised the people of Milwaukee haven't run them out of town yet.
"I call my guy friends bitches too, so it isn't sexist when I call her a bitch. In fact it's sexist NOT to. #staywoke #notsexist""Look F-E-M-A-L-E-S, I understand your plight, issues and concerns, but just don't talk about them TOOO sternly ok? Otherwise you sound like a bitch. Me and all my guy friends agreed. #progressive #notsexist"
Accurate