From: https://www.reddit.com/r/Steam/comments/7x5p94/insel_games_ceo_threatened_employees_to_force/
Seems pretty shady.
Seems pretty shady.
"Buy the game and file for a refund or explain to me why you failed to do this"
I mean do you blame them? Either they do that or from the way that email ending sounds they get fired either directly after explaining to this asshole why they don't want to do it or later on if the game fails (which is part of the problem with Steam, even good games have a hard time making headway because there is just sooo many other games you have to compete against) its a really shitty situation to be in and all because of the CEO giving this ultimatum to their employees. I hope the blowback on this is huge the CEO is such an asshat for putting his employees in this situation and makes me really wonder how many other smaller companies do the same.Well looks like some caved in (from Reddit)
The user only owns 2 games (that are from Insel) and posted 2 reviews... And the timing for Wild Buster coincides with the mail.
Absolutely not (I should have said it in my post), I get they don't want to lose their job. Hell, I hear so much shit about how hard being a game developer is I can only sympathize with them.
Well looks like some caved in (from Reddit)
The user only owns 2 games (that are from Insel) and posted 2 reviews... And the timing for Wild Buster coincides with the mail.
Is there anything in Steam developer/publisher guidelines that prohibits employees of companies from reviewing their own games? A few thoughts in general
What is see here is a bundle of questionably appropriate, but not "wrong," things that together create a cacophony of desperation and baaaaad PR. Overall I do feel for the guy, sucks to be in his position, but there are better ways to go about this.
- The job thing did come off as a little threatening, but he also included himself in it
- The request for employees to buy and get reimbursed for the game seems fine at surface level, but when you factor in the previous request for review then it get's a little shady (i.e. get the game so that you can review it) vs. get the game so then you can provide feedback to me
- I think mandating individual conversations is a tiny bit extreme, but especially if they are a small dev isn't completely inappropriate
- I TOTALLY get an email encouraging your employees to get the word out/promote the game. "Hey guys, our game isn't doing great I would appreciate if you could make an effort to help get the word out!" but the approach here is mighty icky
It's absolutely "wrong." It falls under the category of being completely unethical. Unless you are preceding all of these reviews with, "BY THE WAY I HELPED MAKE THIS GAME" ... you don't get to offer a review of the game intended to sway people to purchase it.
Why should anybody compromise their integrity for a venture doomed to failure? If the game is bad they're only delaying the inevitable.Writing this email is poor taste.
Whomever leaked this is insane.
Small gaming companies die all the time, every single person should be fighting for it's survival.
Why should anybody compromise their integrity for a venture doomed to failure? If the game is bad they're only delaying the inevitable.
Big difference in shadiness betweenIs there anything in Steam developer/publisher guidelines that prohibits employees of companies from reviewing their own games? A few thoughts in general
What is see here is a bundle of questionably appropriate, but not "wrong," things that together create a cacophony of desperation and baaaaad PR. Overall I do feel for the guy, sucks to be in his position, but there are better ways to go about this.
- The job thing did come off as a little threatening, but he also included himself in it
- The request for employees to buy and get reimbursed for the game seems fine at surface level, but when you factor in the previous request for review then it get's a little shady (i.e. get the game so that you can review it) vs. get the game so then you can provide feedback to me
- I think mandating individual conversations is a tiny bit extreme, but especially if they are a small dev isn't completely inappropriate
- I TOTALLY get an email encouraging your employees to get the word out/promote the game. "Hey guys, our game isn't doing great I would appreciate if you could make an effort to help get the word out!" but the approach here is mighty icky
Why should anybody compromise their integrity for a venture doomed to failure? If the game is bad they're only delaying the inevitable.
I got no problem with a CEO saying "hey guys, our game isn't doing well, try and help get the word out any way you can and maybe some positive WoM".
But this dude straight said "I can't force you to buy the game and give it a good review, buuuuuuut if you don't you are basically a terrible person and I want you to explain your actions"
Way, way too aggressive and ridiculous.
Is there anything in Steam developer/publisher guidelines that prohibits employees of companies from reviewing their own games? A few thoughts in general
What is see here is a bundle of questionably appropriate, but not "wrong," things that together create a cacophony of desperation and baaaaad PR. Overall I do feel for the guy, sucks to be in his position, but there are better ways to go about this.
- The job thing did come off as a little threatening, but he also included himself in it
- The request for employees to buy and get reimbursed for the game seems fine at surface level, but when you factor in the previous request for review then it get's a little shady (i.e. get the game so that you can review it) vs. get the game so then you can provide feedback to me
- I think mandating individual conversations is a tiny bit extreme, but especially if they are a small dev isn't completely inappropriate
- I TOTALLY get an email encouraging your employees to get the word out/promote the game. "Hey guys, our game isn't doing great I would appreciate if you could make an effort to help get the word out!" but the approach here is mighty icky
You don't have to write the review. Leaking the email is a different thing entirely, regardless of the content it's an unprofessional breach.
You have a completely opposite definition of "unprofessional" to mine, if yours covers "whistleblowing that I was coerced into doing something immoral and possibly illegal". Must fucking suck being your coworker.