I can accept some growth but also we can't ignore that PS5 could also get growth.
Closer to release probably when we actually know stuff, not just vague stuff or vague rumours, PS4 vs XB1 ones where great imo, lot of funny stuff.
Why would you need to do that? Surely being in-the-know is better than being out of the loop. It's up to you what you publish at the end of the day.
The way I see it Microsoft can charge whatever they want for anaconda as long as They provide an entry console. With the X they proved that there is a market out there for people who want to best no matter the cost. If they pull out a price of 599.99 And it's a beast it will sell and I'd be first in line
That "aiming" language is weak at best. Anyone can aim for whatever they want, what the result will be is a different story. I have no doubt they're aiming high. What else could it be though? Aiming for lower performance? Such strange language.
MS' are probably safe bets. Sony will probably try and get that golden 399 or as close as possible, especially if MS jump the gun with their pricing announcements.
make a video of yourself blindfolded, throwing darts at a board of 500 predictions, where only 10 are real
Oh I agree. It doesn't mean a great deal. They probably aimed the same with XB1.
My thoughts as well. Outside of Sony underclocking everything, I don't see a big difference happening. The major components are based on the same tech.
I remember the early days of Engadget and gizmodo, with Ryan block and peter rojas, they had a good stance on leaks and rumours: they would publish them, but not without first reaching out to the targets of those leaks. If the targets share with you the truth and ask you not to publish, then you don't.
