• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

LordOfLore

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,543
Stockholm, Sweden
Link.

It's difficult to imagine what sort of response Marvel expected when it announced a partnership with Northrop Grumman, the fifth largest defense contractor in the world. But the publisher's decision to axe the deal following a swift wave of backlash suggests that it didn't anticipate people being turned off.

The story was intended to be the sort of promotional, explicitly-branded tie-in that you see in comics all the time. Mars, for instance, has worked with Marvel in the past to advertise M&Ms by having their characters team up with Iron Man. Obviously, though, there's a very big difference between advertising candy and advertising missiles, one of Northrop Grumman's more widely-known products.

In a public statement, Marvel explained that the planned comic book that would have seen the Avengers team up with a group of Northrop Grumman employees, was "meant to focus on aerospace technology and exploration in a positive way." Critics of the partnership insisted that in partnering with a defense contracting company, Marvel was effectively marketing the military to a young audience—a message decidedly at odds with characters like Tony Stark's views on the military-industrial complex. Said Marvel:

The activation with Northrop Grumman at New York Comic Con was meant to focus on aerospace technology and exploration in a positive way. However, as the spirit of that intent has not come across, we will not be proceeding with this partnership including this weekend's event programming. Marvel and Northrop Grumman continue to be committed to elevating, and introducing, STEM to a broad audience.

The optics of the partnership were obviously bad enough that Marvel felt it'd be better off without, but what's remained unclear was just how bad (or harmless) the comic actually was. Thanks to an anonymous tipster, we got our hands on the first issue and it's... a comic promoting a defense contractor. If you've ever read a tie-in comic before, it's par for the course: it includes a team of tie-in characters getting to upstage the famous superheroes who guest-star, a barely-there plot, and awkward and clumsy writing. It's just got an extra layer of awkwardness, since the thing being promoted in it is a defense contractor.

More at the link.
 

kmfdmpig

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
19,354
It's certainly bad optics, but like Hollywood mainstream comics often have a fairly pro-military perspective, so I suspect that they didn't expect the backlash to be quite so strong.
 

Finaj

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,359
It's certainly bad optics, but like Hollywood mainstream comics often have a fairly pro-military perspective, so I suspect that they didn't expect the backlash to be quite so strong.

Ir depends on the franchise. The DCCU (Specifically Man of Steel) gained subsidies from the US military and required script approval from the government, but The Avengers (and I assume other MCU films) were denied said subsidies because they weren't propagandist enough.
 

kmfdmpig

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
19,354
Ir depends on the franchise. The DCCU (Specifically Man of Steel) gained subsidies from the US military and required script approval from the government, but The Avengers (and I assume other MCU films) were denied said subsidies because they weren't propagandist enough.
Yes, it's certainly not a universal truth. Iron Man 1 and 2 did receive military funding. Avengers almost did, but as you say it fell through.
https://www.wired.com/2012/05/avengers-military/
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2009/jul/06/us-military-hollywood

The movie that launched the MCU is an indictment of the military industry complex though.
Yes, but ironically, the film was partially supported by the Pentagon, which probably limited/constrained the focus of its indictment.
 

Sgt. Demblant

Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,030
France
Ha! Shit, an eight-part series with Andrea Di Vito doing the art? What a waste. But work is work I guess, can't really blame them.

This is hilarious:
dh0vft5mqqzcaysrq7zy.png