I hate that I've aparently become a defender of what was a completely lukewarm, flawed final season, but do you have any self-awareness of how ridiculous and unnecessary it is that you are calling out the showrunners "cancer"?
How about making a judgement that it was rushed for "no good reason," despite knowing nothing about the behind the scene factors behind the actual decision itself? What exactly can you tell me about running a television show? What is your resume, and how would you have balanced filming with actor negotiations and scheduling and managing creative control with suits at HBO who want to see the show go on forever?
Contrast this with the fact that I have also heard nothing but actors talking about how grateful they are to have worked on the show, how long they had to commit to filming in dreary weather away from their friends and family for much of the year, and the enormous human toll of putting this show together on a crew of thousands. For eight years. These people are all enormously grateful to get to move on with their lives, proud of what they have accomplished together, and yet fans (Ironically? Unironically? Probably both) are asking for them to come back and give them the ending they want.
So maybe I'm just too old for the internet now, but the hyperbole and toxicity really grates on me. By all means voice your criticisms! That's not what this is about. The ending could have been so much better! But calling the showrunners "cancer" (so gross) does nothing but reinforce this senseless, meaningless entitlement on the part of "fans" whos only contribution is consumption or critique of someone else's creative output.
Its not enough to be disappointed, no, it must be torn down.
