In response Israel will strike their sams and pretend they thought they were Assad's, shrug smiley.
Apologies for rooting for Israel's retaliatory response to Assad and his Iranian terrorist proxies.
Response to:
I didn't say that he was free of any wrongdoing. All I am saying is that while Assad would still be a heartless monster, it wouldn't have become a huge proxy war had the west not started arming random militia groups that might be linked to ISIS.
you just seem like a war hungry person, it's quite sad
you can't be serious
How would they give it back if Israel is building settlements in that land? They are not using that land for any security reason, they are building it and I doubt a country like Israel would do such a thing then give it away.
No response possible.
Went to war, lost said war, lost land. It's quite simple really and as I already said: it was resolved in the Sinai with Egypt.
Explain.
Personally I don't think so. It's just calling Putin's bluff. Russia doesn't really control all that much in Syria, not even its Assad Iran axis. Their main concern in Syria is to keep an Assad led vasal state afloat.
Israel had settlements in the Sinai too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Former_Israeli_settlements_in_Sinai
Explain.
you seem to belive you're living in the middle ages. that's not how things work in the modern world with the existence of international laws. and the land you claim to be israel's, is considered by pretty much every other country to be syrian land occupied by israel.
This is why the nation of Germany doesn't exist anymore except as occupied land held by Russia and the USA. Of course.
feeling exactly the same. i hope if israel is that dumb to make the same mistake twice the next one gets shot down as well
Phrasing it as Syria simply just deciding to invade Isreal without any mention of the context that was the Six-Day War is disingenious as hell.
No one with genuine intentions would cheer a bloodthirsty government, so I'll cut to the chase. Israel being "successful" to establish and run an ethno-state (read apartheid) doesn't mean another one is going to happen in ME.
i really hope the kurds, in their pursuit of getting their own independent state don't follow zionist ideology and israel as an example. they don't have the backing of the west to the same degree so it'll likely never happen, but still.
Middle ages? I just gave you the example of Nazi Germany.
So whataboutism is what you defend Israel with right? When you have to use whataboutism then you should really think about things a little, like maybe the thing you are defending might not be a thing worth defending.
can i ask you a question?
That's not how "this is off-topic" works. You can't just say it's off topic and then state your, well, let's say highly debatable opinion on it anyway with the expectation of not being challenged on it.
No, since they didn't have wars as a basis unlike the occupation of the Golan Heights.
No whataboutism whatsoever. The user claimed those things only happened in the middle ages. The best argument to dispute that is to bring forward examples not set in the middle ages, is it not?
I can absolutely do that because that's not the focus of my reply and not the focus of this thread.
interesting, i assumed he'd be viewed more negatively. but then again, i'm never quite clear how the other middle eastern countries view iran and their operations. seems like the view on him isn't the same across the board.
i think these rumors still exist
Sharon was forced out, they never did pull out willingly. And I am talking about Netanyahu, didn't you hear what he had to say?
