• We have completed a significant site update. Come see what's new!
  • Community Spotlight sign-ups are open once again for both Gaming and EtcetEra Hangout threads! If you want to shine a spotlight on your community, please register now.

Ivanka Trump is reportedly under consideration to lead The World Bank

Ambient80

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
1,299
Just like she was supposed to be the Ambassador to the UN. They float her name to make it seems like she's being considered for big positions.

Than again, Heather Nauert got the UN gig so who the fuck knows at this point.
It’s all to build up her eventual presidential campaign in a couple cycles.

/s... I hope.
 

lmcfigs

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
5,939
It's 2019 and people still think you need "qualifications" or a "phd" to get such a leadership position.
 

entremet

Member
Oct 26, 2017
14,354
Damn, looks and the right sperm donor really help you in life lol.

But in all seriousness, I think this is a BS report. Not BS reporting as The Financial Times are reputable, but BS that the Trump Administration is floating her name. It's almost as if they are trolling at this point.
 

.Detective.

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,754
Do it.

Because she can be easily swayed away from her father's views, and thus screw him over, in the way he doesn't want.

Evidence:
 
Oct 30, 2017
1,363
For those who are unfamiliar with the old President of the World Bank, he's a super sharp individual.
It's just depressing to think about this man who is a strong leader, compassionate, an MD, an anthropologist, and so multi talented could be replaced by Ivanka Trump.

NPR's podcast Freakonomics did an interview with him back in 2015. Give it a listen.
 

demondance

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,183
love how we collectively revolted against the idea of monarchy, ridding ourselves of the tyranny of various inbred lunatics with no business ruling, only to build a much more convoluted system that led to the exact same material result
 

Stinkles

343 Industries
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
11,687
love how we collectively revolted against the idea of monarchy, ridding ourselves of the tyranny of various inbred lunatics with no business ruling, only to build a much more convoluted system that led to the exact same material result

The founding fathers were a direct result of the Enlightenment and a worldwide push for rationality, philosophy and the real advance of science, but the vast majority of them were in some ways already arisitocrats of a sort, in that they held lands, inherited wealth, inherited positions and were groomed for that success. Even an alleged outsider, like Alexander Hamilton was descended directly from Scottish aristocracy, and his "whore" mother was the daughter of a wealthy landowner and gentleman farmer who was only a "whore" in that she had a scndalous affair with... Alexander Hamilton's mildly aristocratic but ne'er do well father. And Hamilton is one of the most common ones. Even as a bastard, no small matter at the time, he's much more Jon Snow than Oliver Twist. Raised in and around society and wealth and sponsored by wealthy men.

He would never have been permitted to marry his wealthy wife without the slight sheen of respectability that even his bastard hybrid status brought to the table and he'd never have gotten that far in the first plkace without it.

American independence was of course driven by resentment of the crown, but all of those founding fathers had some outrageous built in assumptions about wealth and status that wouldn't fly today. And they also contained many deseprate for the elevation in status that they couldn't have through English aristiocracy in this colony, so in some ways decided to make their own.

They talk about meritocracy and enlightened thought, but there was no shortage of built in aristoicratic tendency, systems and families. And they didn't want the hoi polloi voting at all. Much as Greek democracy actually only included the wealthy and aristocratic.
 

Linkark07

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,755
Projects in emerging economies you say? Panama is beautiful this time of year. That’s what the Papers say anyway.
You shouldn't call it Panama Papers. We Panamanians hate that name.

I don't care actually. I'm fully aware Panama is a fucking tax haven. But here the media and the Governmet call it the 'Mal llamados Panama Papers' .
 

Biske

Member
Nov 11, 2017
2,131
Why not. Just fuck our shit up. Lets put an incompetent racist dipshit in every position possible.
 

zer0das

Member
Nov 20, 2017
1,951
love how we collectively revolted against the idea of monarchy, ridding ourselves of the tyranny of various inbred lunatics with no business ruling, only to build a much more convoluted system that led to the exact same material result
It happens when the government gives up on punishing white collar crime with any sort of real consequences while people get killed for stealing food. If they didn't abdicate their responsibility, Trump would have been in prison 30 years ago.
 

The Bookerman

Member
Oct 25, 2017
817
My uncle probably hates that idea. He worked at the world bank his whole life.
Nepotism at work.

Question though, does Trump actually knows what the world bank does?
 

Rupetta

Member
Oct 27, 2017
556
Boston/Helsinki
Yesh, gonna call this as one of those planted rumors that end with people thinking the neocolonial ghoul they eventually nominate is at least ”not Ivanka”...

it´s not a given that Ivanka would get elected if nominated since they renewed the election protocol in 2011 towards an emphasis on merits based, there has also been a big push on the board to break US hegemony... so unfortunately I feel confident they will nominate someone like Erik Prince who will fuck the developing countries over so hard - this is the list of the Executive board that elects the director is found here: http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/241041541103873167/BankExecutiveDirectors.pdf

Also see: https://www.wsj.com/articles/world-bank-lays-out-ground-rules-for-selecting-next-president-11547144676
 

Xe4

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,192
God, if you're up there, you've been letting me down recently. But PLEASE don't let this happen. I shudder to think of a Trump leading one of the world's most important financial institutions.

Cue Kushner taking over the FED after firing Powell.
 
Nov 2, 2017
2,323
Just think when this family is out of the WH. It's gonna be so bland and normal. We're gonna miss the crazy, the collusion, and the carefree fuck the people aura of the Trumps.
 

BlackLagoon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
915
Just think when this family is out of the WH. It's gonna be so bland and normal. We're gonna miss the crazy, the collusion, and the carefree fuck the people aura of the Trumps.
You could always hope for an upset during the Democratic primaries. A Gabbard/Avenatti presidency ought to at least provide a fair bit of entertainment value.
 

mario_O

Member
Nov 15, 2017
1,273
Bolsonaro to get a ton of money to destroy the amazon rainforest? That's how that World Bank mafia operates. Good business.