Same network of dumbasses that thinks health care will "bankrupt" (their words) this country, but there's always cash for war.
Possibly, we'll see. Regardless the margin will be smaller than 2016, and could be influenced by the results of early states. Also Bernie will win Utah, and the race won't be over. In fact it's unlikely that anyone will accumulate enough delegates prior to the conventoon, as hellish as that will be, I see it as the likely outcome.
well there was also that whole thing where he kept randomly threatening violence against people
I WILL KEEP HIS MEMORY ALIVE
I definitely agree and I'll vote for either in a general (I just took the WaPo quiz and I was most aligned with Warren first, Sanders second). It's truly that that label gets thrown around without much rhyme or reason so going by those "rules" my use of it seemed fine. I would sincerely love to see consistency and honesty applied when the label is being used.
I'd love it if that worked! Unfortunately, It's important to problematize and interrogate these inconsistencies and hypocrisies.
oh fucking spare me lmao
This post you are replying to is factually incorrect. Bernie ran the same race 2 years before as an independent and always planned to run as an independent again in 1990, but he got write-in votes because he was popular. It's also why the Democratic primary that year had so few voters.
The politics of the US being famous for remaining strictly confined to its territorial boundaries. I certainly haven't heard about this Sanders/Warren spat all day on the radio in Australia.
certainly impressed by this extremely large contingent of non-citizen non-resident non-voters who seem literally convinced of The End of All Things if one man is not nominated and who make sure to remind people who've knocked on doors and conducted phonebanking for over a decade of this at every possible opportunity
Bernie Sanders did not run in the Democratic Primary in 1990. Mickey Mouse has never run for President but he gets thousands of write-in votes in every election.
Ironically:
This guy has me blocked on Twitter and I've never interacted with him, so he must be a jackass.
Both the tweet and that post acknowledge that it was a write-in. Let's be charitable and assume that they were both so excited to post the dirty secret behind Bernie's "within the past 30 years" win that they didn't have time to consider how somebody could get 2,000 write-in votes and then go on to get 100,000+ in the general as an independent lolIronically:
a) it even says write-in in the Wikipedia table and this was somehow missed by both Rilakkuma and xbhasharx
b) some dude named Peter Diamondstone actually kinda did what people are trying to accuse Sanders of
Have you ever considered that maybe she didn't feel right shaking his hand if he lied on stage and did tell her that a woman couldn't be President?
I'm surprised Steyer really is getting a lot of attention in Nevada and the Carolinas.
Normal people: who is Bernie Sanders?
I too can tell who is truthful by examining their gender.
I've just watched the patterns of the Sanders campaign.
Is it your theory that the Sanders campaign instigated this by leaking Warren's private opinions to the press?
My theory is that the Sanders campaign has a pattern of dishonesty.
Unfortunately from what I understand things are a bit touchy at the moment regarding foreign involvement in your elections.
Ahh, but you need a theory of both campaigns. Just calling Sanders a liar doesn't cut it. You have to believe Warren's campaign COULDN'T lie. Is that your position?
Steyer in SC/NV.....
Normal people: who is Bernie Sanders?
So you have no opinion on whether Warren's campaign might lie?
