I believe Juanita Broaddrick, and I also believe her inference about her encounter with Hillary, where Juanita claims Hillary intimidated her.
But let's assume that part of Broaddrick's account is wrong and Hillary didn't know and Hillary just doesn't believe.
People not believing rape accusations isn't exculpatory. There are millions of reasons to look away when someone you like, someone you employ, or someone you're married to is accused. Just because you can look away doesn't mean it's justified to look away. Broaddrick's account is detailed, consistent, and backed by people who say she told them when it happened. It's not justified to look away from Broadrick's claim. If Hillary still "doesn't believe" and chooses to support and elevate the man at the center of those allegations, it is appropriate to judge Hillary accordingly.
The credibility of Broaddrick's account matters. And not only that, but Hillary has protected abusers within her campaign recently, too.
She doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt.