It means interacting with underage people with the intention of making them your lover when they come of age.
that is grooming, but grooming is a lot more general than that one specific example.It means interacting with underage people with the intention of making them your lover when they come of age.
Probably not. She'll likely be dismissed from some professional circles and probably go radio silent for a while.Man, we live in crazy times. Jennifer Scheurle's career could be over in a heartbeat (maybe rightfully so), simply based on twitter allegations.
Probably not. She'll likely be dismissed from some professional circles and probably go radio silent for a while.
Damn I've been following her for a while now as she seems like a genuinely nice person and always shares an interesting perspectives and anecdotes but yeah, yikes.
Saw this posted as well.
The Gamergate types were already calling for her to be fired when she was at Arenanet because of her views.Honestly, I'm mostly concerned that the Shipbreaker fans already angry about the union storyline and "sjw" characters will use this as extra fuel to campaign against further changes to the game. (Jennifer is the lead designer at that studio)
Damn I've been following her for a while now as she seems like a genuinely nice person and always shares an interesting perspectives and anecdotes but yeah, yikes.
Saw this posted as well.
The OP clarified there was nothing sexual about her behavior and that grooming may have been the wrong word to use. Either way, it was abuse.
So reading up on her tweets she said it wasn't sexual. Is it still grooming?
So reading up on her tweets she said it wasn't sexual. Is it still grooming?
Damn I've been following her for a while now as she seems like a genuinely nice person and always shares an interesting perspectives and anecdotes but yeah, yikes.
Saw this posted as well.
Grooming doesn't only mean sexual, though. This can still be grooming. Building a relationship with someone to gain their trust then to eventually exploit, gaslight, and abuse them is grooming.The OP clarified there was nothing sexual about her behavior and that grooming may have been the wrong word to use. Either way, it was abuse.
Holly shit, rather than pretending to care now, they basically enabled her for years.Damn I've been following her for a while now as she seems like a genuinely nice person and always shares an interesting perspectives and anecdotes but yeah, yikes.
Saw this posted as well.
I'm not trying to call you out I just want to say that I understand. I have been bullied my entire childhood and throughout high school. I just want to say you trust the individual person standing in front of you. Not ideologies, not where they were born, not what other people say about them but the real person standing in front of you. If this was unnecessary and your statement was rhetorical then disregard I wrote.Have seen and heard about Jennifer often on twitter and if this turns out to be true then man... who can you even trust anymore?
Have seen and heard about Jennifer often on twitter and if this turns out to be true then man... who can you even trust anymore?
I'm not trying to call you out I just want to say that I understand. I have been bullied my entire childhood and throughout high school. I just want to say you trust the individual person standing in front of you. Not ideologies, not where they were born, not what other people say about them but the real person standing in front of you. If this was unnecessary and your statement was rhetorical then disregard I wrote.
It seems I wasn't clear enough. I never trusted her or anyone that I don't know. Heck I never even followed her. But seeing how many other known devs interacted with her, in what position she is and how outspoken she is one might assume(!) that she is a person that wouldn't end up like a shithead. I can even see people working with her thinking she might be a decent person, until she might backstab you.
Why would you trust anyone you don't know just because people say nice things about them on Twitter? Famous, revered, idolised, whatever. Surely experience has taught us better.
Some people will accuse me of trust issues. I believe the opposite is a trust issue. I believe that trust has to be earned, it's not a given, not a default, not assumed. And once earned, it's not indefinite.
Well let me be honest, no person ever should trust anyone professionally in an absolute manner. You make plans both under the assumption that every person your working with is working under good faith while also making sure that everything is in order if they aren't.It seems I wasn't clear enough. I never trusted her or anyone that I don't know. Heck I never even followed her. But seeing how many other known devs interacted with her, in what position she is and how outspoken she is one might assume(!) that she is a person that wouldn't end up like a shithead. I can even see people working with her thinking she might be a decent person, until she might backstab you.
Because of people like her, one might never trust anyone professionally
I read your quote and I Stand by what i said. Disregard everything else because in reality it is circumstantial evidence treat as people as individuals. Other people's experience can inform your decisions but they can not replace your own decisions. Take care.It seems I wasn't clear enough. I never trusted her or anyone that I don't know. Heck I never even followed her. But seeing how many other known devs interacted with her, in what position she is and how outspoken she is one might assume(!) that she is a person that wouldn't end up like a shithead. I can even see people working with her thinking she might be a decent person, until she might backstab you.
Because of people like her, one might never trust anyone professionally
Oh wow. I can't wait to see their response.Holly shit, rather than pretending to care now, they basically enabled her for years.
Yeah:
Either way, it sounds like Scheurle was a huge asshole, and not accountable to how she hurt people.
I think it's possible to overemphasize specific terms. When someone hurts you, you often look for a box to put that hurt in, a framework for understanding the pain. That's what happened here. After sitting on it for awhile, the person who stepped forward apparently decided "grooming" wasn't the best word, but abusive behavior is still abusive behavior.
So hardcore manipulation.Neilg answered this earlier in the thread. Grooming doesn't have to be sexual. I used that word because it was used in the tweet.
The original Twitter thread has been followed up on to say it wasn't sexual, but was abusive behavior. And she doesn't appear to be the only one, based on comments from others, or the previous complaints sent to IGDA.
Mods have updated the title.
Is there a specific range of traits that are shared/required between abusive twats and CEOs, or does it bring itself out...or what...?
Damn I've been following her for a while now as she seems like a genuinely nice person and always shares an interesting perspectives and anecdotes but yeah, yikes.
Saw this posted as well.
Holly shit, rather than pretending to care now, they basically enabled her for years.
Is there a specific range of traits that are shared/required between abusive twats and CEOs, or does it bring itself out...or what...?
Damn I've been following her for a while now as she seems like a genuinely nice person and always shares an interesting perspectives and anecdotes but yeah, yikes.
Saw this posted as well.
Honestly, I'm mostly concerned that the Shipbreaker fans already angry about the union storyline and "sjw" characters will use this as extra fuel to campaign against further changes to the game. (Jennifer is the lead designer at that studio)
Doc Burford (Adiós, Paratopic) did a lot of narrative work on Shipbreakers, too. I'm guessing more cool folks were behind that game that contributed to the space working class and anti-capitalist narrative.Honestly, I'm mostly concerned that the Shipbreaker fans already angry about the union storyline and "sjw" characters will use this as extra fuel to campaign against further changes to the game. (Jennifer is the lead designer at that studio)