I am actually glad he didn't like it, cause he always have very one dimensional taste in my opinion.
He didn't like anything ''complex'' meaning he didn't like weapon degradation, survival elements, inventory management, crafting, back tracking etc.
As long as a game is fun to his liking he will give it a high score regardless of the flaws.
Nioh got 10/10 from him despite the boring repetitive enemies and uninspired level structure/design. While Bloodbonre on the other hand only got a 9/10, despite the superior design of Bloodborne he prefers the combat of Nioh and that alone is enough to make it score higher in his eyes.
I am not saying ''Jim is wrong'' or ''Jim is a bad reviewer''
I am just saying that's how he is, his opinion is so straight forward and simplistic that you can tell he is pretty much always reviewing based on emotion instead of reason.
Remember that one time he gave Hellblade a 1/10 because of a ''bug'' and he had to change the score afterwards? That's emotional reviews for you.
Jim's reviews basically comes down to ''ME HAPPY, GAME GOOD! ME NO HAPPY, GAME BAD!''
Nothing wrong with that really, he isn't the only one who reviews with that mindset, but it is worth acknowledging.
I am not a hater by the way, I am subscribed to his channel and I enjoy most of his videos including this one. I just never took his opinions too seriously because of the reasons I mentioned above.