Not to be glib, but if you don't know the answer to the above, how can you say anything to counter the assertion below?
Seems to me that if Glitter is getting royalties from this, that people who see it are quite literally aiding a pedophile.
Maybe he doesn't get royalties from it... I don't know either way. I just don't get the rhetorical point you're trying to make .
edit: Glitter does get royalties from it:
Despite being behind bars, Gadd still earns royalties from his music. Though his work is blackballed from UK radio, it occasionally pops up in US movies — including
Todd Phillips'
Joker. His song "Rock and Roll Part 2", which used to be a sporting events staple thanks to its chant-able "hey" chorus, memorable chord progression, and stomping drums, features prominently in the Warner Bros. picture. For nearly two minutes, it soundtracks
Joaquin Phoenix's title character dancing down a Gotham staircase.
CNBC reports that because of this use, Gadd stands to receive a large lump sum of money on top of royalties from future DVD and potential soundtrack sales.