Discussion in 'EtcetEra' started by Purple Chocolate Bar, Mar 19, 2018.
We need a very high IQ to fall for the lobster pseudoscience
Already quoted from this put Peterson's stupid University is moving forward... grades are basically done by upvotes... It's Reddit in University form with no accreditation .
Social democrat is the same color as Libertarian.
None is different from Don't identify.
The sorting is all over the place (why orderalphabetically when you could group close group together so you could do broader bigger analysis?)
Peterson's subreddit is really not good at data representation...kinda like Peterson himself.
This university's diploma is gonna be real good at letting us identify idiots.
I would love for the Peterson fans who said he's a real liberal for promoting the discussion of different ideas to explain how they reconcile their praise with the fact that he plans on removing entire subjects from the discussion at his university.
Jordan Peterson's logic is this:
JP: "Frozen is propaganda because it shows that women can be successfull on their own"
Then you reply to him "Of course they can, why not??"
But genius JP knows the answer to that too: "You see, you might be livingin a house right? So this house... I mean statistics show 99% of the builders are male... and biologically it makes sense... so this house you are living in has been built by a male... and I'm not suggesting that this might always be the case... but most of the time it'll be... so it's been built by males and it's unlikely women would have got to where they are without a place to live."
It took me about 10 minutes of listening to one of his videos to realize that anything he says ultimately leads to nowhere, just like this thread.
Why does Jordan Peterson constantly threaten people with violence?
I highly doubt that considering a lot of the places he goes have them challenging his views. I would like to see him talk to more professors.
> changes data from poll to fit his/her view
Psycho_Mantis you still have not responded to the claims that both you and Peterson both misunderstood the law that he became famous for. Can you please respond to these claims? Selectively quoting things that you can obfuscate is not exactly making me think you're very credible about this subject.
You know, once people expose their arguments as empty and their ideas as laughable
I just caught up on this guy a little bit.
Boy is he hard to pin down. Most debates go this way:
*Peterson makes controversial/provoking statement
*man attempts to characterize his statement in some way
*Peterson: "I'm not saying that"
*man attempts to clarify what he is saying
*Peterson makes some comparison analogy
*man attempts to bring Peterson's ideas together
*Peterson "I'm not saying that, I'm just saying we don't know the rules etc."
He puts something up for debate but then is unwilling to defend it properly. At some point you have to admit that the fault lies with Peterson and his inability to fully establish his ideas. He won't put his castle in the ground and defend it. Instead he is always moving, always avoiding subscribing to an any sort of ideology that he would have to defend.
If you can’t provide evidence that support it, vs people using the actual law, then you have nothing to stand on.
http://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/bill/C-16/royal-assent. It's short, you shouldn't need 10 minutes to discuss this. You should be able to point to this immediately. I can link the full text if it helps.
I don't know why some of you have all of these questions that need answering. Just strap yourself into a Ludovico chair, hire an eye wetter on taskrabbit, and consume 60 straight hours of videos. I don't have the answers but they're probably in there somewhere and you'll come out the other side a fan!
"Classical liberalism is a political ideology that values the freedom of individuals — including the freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and markets — as well as limited government."
Yeah that sounds exactly like conservatism to me.
EDIT: How does Peterson's desire to eliminate certain areas of study line up with classical liberalism?
And Psycho Mantis has been banned.
That was quite exhaustive and I am looking forward to the peer review.
Universities need to focus on bettering the faculty to student ratio, not finding ways to further abstract and commodify the university education.
75% of the sub supports Trump or Johnson.
Classical Liberal is a form of conservatism.
You're the one ignoring the data.