thebishop is right, Wikileaks isn't just Assange, it's much bigger than him
Freedom fighters, every one of them!
thebishop is right, Wikileaks isn't just Assange, it's much bigger than him
I'll have to brush up on the Manning saga then, it was long ago.She didnt selectively release information that revealed the crimes while protecting people who werent decision makers but who were put at risk by releasing the info. Why is that hard for you to understand? The two are not mutually exclusive. Look at Snowden and many other people who leaked info about our govt. jesus
Snowden made sure his leaks were controlled through releasing it with news outlets and didn't release any infos that would be damaging to unrelated people. Manning didn't. I don't see how they're not both whistleblowers, regardless of what you think of them. With Snowden being the one doing more due diligence with it.Manning absolutely was a whistleblower at the time. She revealed the US committing war crimes. Snowden, is not a whistleblower. He's the idiot you should direct your ire at.
I don't see a problem in her being jailed for refusing to testify. That's what happens when you try to ignore subpoenas.
Wikileaks was never bad. it releases accurate, secret information about powerful state and corporate actors in the public interest and has never been responsible for outing a source. It would be an incredible blow to press freedom worldwide if Assange was successfully prosecuted for crimes related to *publishing*. I have no interest in defending Assange on the Swedish rape allegations, and at any rate, Wikileaks is bigger than Assange.
That is unless a Sanders government would align with Russian interests of course.Wikileaks is a bigoted organization who seeks to only "expose" a curated list of governments.
And won't think twice of going after say a Sanders government.
Stupidity is not bravery
Whether or not you believe it, she makes it clear that her reasons for refusing to testify are for her beliefs in the grand jury process, not defending Wikileaks.
Imagine actually believing any of this horseshit in 2019Wikileaks was never bad. it releases accurate, secret information about powerful state and corporate actors in the public interest and has never been responsible for outing a source. It would be an incredible blow to press freedom worldwide if Assange was successfully prosecuted for crimes related to *publishing*. I have no interest in defending Assange on the Swedish rape allegations, and at any rate, Wikileaks is bigger than Assange.
How could he be worse than what I thought he was?
This is the bullshit you supportWikileaks was never bad. it releases accurate, secret information about powerful state and corporate actors in the public interest and has never been responsible for outing a source. It would be an incredible blow to press freedom worldwide if Assange was successfully prosecuted for crimes related to *publishing*. I have no interest in defending Assange on the Swedish rape allegations, and at any rate, Wikileaks is bigger than Assange.
Deep state huhI wish her luck. I'm not understanding her stance on this but she's making a principled stand. I applaud her courage. Manning is problematic in some ways but she's braver than any of the posters criticizing her here.
Liberals are authoritarian and believe in "law&order" along with worship of existing structures of power, no matter how inhuman. Since Trump took office, hell even before under Obama, there are many posters who slavishly bootlick the deep state here at ERA. Every topic about Snowden, Manning, the Patriot Act, etc. etc. you will find liberals coming out of the woodwork to boot-lick. Every time.
This is the bullshit you support
Like this post from you could have been made in good faith in the earlier part of this decade, but Wikileaks has long since made sure we all know they're a Russian tool now.
Fucking yikes. Straight up clowns in here trying to defend this crap and more.
I'm not going to doubt someone who has already risked her life plenty for her principles.
I wish her luck. I'm not understanding her stance on this but she's making a principled stand. I applaud her courage. Manning is problematic in some ways but she's braver than any of the posters criticizing her here.
Liberals are authoritarian and believe in "law&order" along with worship of existing structures of power, no matter how inhuman. Since Trump took office, hell even before under Obama, there are many posters who slavishly bootlick the deep state here at ERA. Every topic about Snowden, Manning, the Patriot Act, etc. etc. you will find liberals coming out of the woodwork to boot-lick. Every time.
There's plenty of WL material relevant to Canada. Like this one about US/CA policy re tarsands:
https://thinkprogress.org/wikileaks...canadian-tar-sands-oil-pipeline-ac57984aed99/
Or this one about the Canadian government's efforts to gag the press from reporting about warrantless wiretapping of Mohawk nation protesters:
https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Canadian_Mohawk_wiretaps_injuncted_stories_2008
Liberals are mad that Manning attended a party hosted by Mike Cernovich
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/22/chelsea-manning-far-right-trump-gather-intel
It's atrocious for armchair #resisters to pass judgement on somebody (a trans woman no less!) who has endured unbelievable suffering so the rest of us can know just a glimpse of the evil our government does abroad. I can't believe they lack the self awareness of this.
Anything from WL about Russia though?There's plenty of WL material relevant to Canada. Like this one about US/CA policy re tarsands:
https://thinkprogress.org/wikileaks...canadian-tar-sands-oil-pipeline-ac57984aed99/
Or this one about the Canadian government's efforts to gag the press from reporting about warrantless wiretapping of Mohawk nation protesters:
https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Canadian_Mohawk_wiretaps_injuncted_stories_2008
This is the bullshit you support
Like this post from you could have been made in good faith in the earlier part of this decade, but Wikileaks has long since made sure we all know they're a Russian tool now.
it's pretty ridiculous. who hasn't ended up in a washington dc escape room surrounded by alt right icons? that's probably the shtick of the escape room. be surrounded by the most repugnant individuals to make you want to escape faster.
Can I use Get Out rules for this escape room? Will I be allowed weapons?it's pretty ridiculous. who hasn't ended up in a washington dc escape room surrounded by alt right icons? that's probably the shtick of the escape room. be surrounded by the most repugnant individuals to make you want to escape faster.
Armchair #resister. We're talking about 2 people, Assange and Manning who have paid an incredible price to tell you what your government actually does in the world.
Liberals are authoritarian and believe in "law&order" along with worship of existing structures of power, no matter how inhuman. Since Trump took office, hell even before under Obama, there are many posters who slavishly bootlick the deep state here at ERA. Every topic about Snowden, Manning, the Patriot Act, etc. etc. you will find liberals coming out of the woodwork to boot-lick. Every time.
It would be really alarming if these people were more than spectators to politics. But it's still a frightening indication of where mainstream American thought is at across the bipartisan spectrum. Like all these people who believe in the Trump-Russia-Wikileaks conspiracy don't even notice the cognitive dissonance that it's President Trump (with help from his buddy Mike Pompeo) aggressively moving to prosecute Assange.
She didnt selectively release information that revealed the crimes while protecting people who werent decision makers but who were put at risk by releasing the info. Why is that hard for you to understand? The two are not mutually exclusive. Look at Snowden and many other people who leaked info about our govt. jesus
Can I use Get Out rules for this escape room? Will I be allowed weapons?
Liberals are authoritarian and believe in "law&order" along with worship of existing structures of power, no matter how inhuman. Since Trump took office, hell even before under Obama, there are many posters who slavishly bootlick the deep state here at ERA. Every topic about Snowden, Manning, the Patriot Act, etc. etc. you will find liberals coming out of the woodwork to boot-lick. Every time.
Don't show your cards this easily, it removes the fun.It would be really alarming if these people were more than spectators to politics. But it's still a frightening indication of where mainstream American thought is at across the bipartisan spectrum. Like all these people who believe in the Trump-Russia-Wikileaks conspiracy don't even notice the cognitive dissonance that they're cheering on President Trump's (with help from his buddy Mike Pompeo) aggressive effort to prosecute Assange.
What principle is this? Russia >>> US?
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
When your principles involve sending yourself to prison to protect an arm of Russian intelligence, they're pretty bad ones.
When your principles involve sending yourself to prison to protect an arm of Russian intelligence, they're pretty bad ones.