For a $300 million movie starring widely known superheroes such as Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, the Flash, and Aquaman all in one place as a team, with Cyborg thrown in because sure, why not? The movie that was supposed to be the DCEU's answer to Marvel's Avengers, only to be beaten by the latest film in what was previously a less popular solo series in the MCU featuring only two members of the latter team? If anything, "disappointment" is putting an outcome like that mildly.
Idk. A lot of people walked out in my theater. But I guess WB still gets the moneySo, it's the opinion of those who didn't go and watch the movie that's more important. People who've seen it are liking it.
walk out walk out or just bathroom breaks?Idk. A lot of people walked out in my theater. But I guess WB still gets the money
Indeed.What happened to Blade Runner 2049 was criminal.
A film that doesn't get to coast by on mediocrity is what I would call justice.
I didn't see them come back
Indeed.
A mediocre piece of garbage tanking at the box office is the opposite of criminal. Criminal is Snyder somehow directing three of these fucking things.
I'm over watching Snyder movies in theaters.
I've seen it and most certainly did not like itSo, it's the opinion of those who didn't go and watch the movie that's more important. People who've seen it are liking it.
I'm not blaming Whedon. The movie, as is, is stitched together from reshoots that don't demand anything from the actors or set design or even the cameras. The soundtrack stinks. There is a HIGH probablility, that regardless of your opinion of Snyder, there are scenes that were not reshoots where actors actually act and shots are decently composed and lit, as any film director could do. When I say something seems below Snyder's standards, I mean the shit that's on screen is probably not made by him. So why blame him?I really don't understand this deified glorification of Snyder by DCEU fans.
I mean, you don't ever see this with MCU or Fox fans. No one is calling the Russo Bros. or James Mangold their 'daddy'. No one is giving Bryan Singer or Alan Taylor untold levels of leeway for producing terribly received, underperforming adaptations of their childhood heroes. No one is pretending James Gunn or Matthew Vaughn are arthouse auteurs fighting the man and Hollywood. Even the way they talk about Snyder's style is oddly embellished. 'Critics don't like Snyder's style' - I don't get it, are shoddy storytelling flow and craftmanship directorial traits unique to Snyder now? Even his flaws, they manage to plaster over in some way with a bizarre form of praise. Right now, they're directing all the blame to Whedon and Warner Bros. - both of whom, admittedly, deserve a significant portion. But the film is at least half of Snyder's.
I have only seen complains about Snyder around here :PI really don't understand this deified glorification of Snyder by DCEU fans.
I mean, you don't ever see this with MCU or Fox fans. No one is calling the Russo Bros. or James Mangold their 'daddy'. No one is giving Bryan Singer or Alan Taylor untold levels of leeway for producing terribly received, underperforming adaptations of their childhood heroes. No one is pretending James Gunn or Matthew Vaughn are arthouse auteurs fighting the man and Hollywood. Even the way they talk about Snyder's style is oddly embellished. 'Critics don't like Snyder's style' - I don't get it, are shoddy storytelling flow and craftmanship directorial traits unique to Snyder now? Even his flaws, they manage to plaster over in some way with a bizarre form of praise. Right now, they're directing all the blame to Whedon and Warner Bros. - both of whom, admittedly, deserve a significant portion. But the film is at least half of Snyder's.
Honestly it's my even really a Snyder movie anymore. This thing was reworked by Whedon like crazy
Its called social media engineering. If it put Trump in the whitehouse it sure can sink a film.
Still if it gets good word of mouth it might not drop much by next week.
Make a gofundme for WB Execs?You know I was all about watching this in theaters because I'm a DC fan but hearing people's reactions makes me want to wait for a redbox haha. On one hand I want to support DC content but I also don't want to support shitty movies... hmm...
Maybe a kickstarter for "decent" DC movie
Saw it, liked it even less than BvS (extended cut, but still). If SS didn't exist I'd call it my least favorite comic book movie in the last two decades (didn't see any of the FF movies, and I would indeed rate Last Stand and all the Wolverine spinoffs above this)...So, it's the opinion of those who didn't go and watch the movie that's more important. People who've seen it are liking it.
But on the flipside, when they miss the mark, they're get creamed. Meanwhile, MCU gets a pass:
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/iron_man_3/ (79%)
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/avengers_age_of_ultron/ (75%)
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/thor_the_dark_world/ (66%)
I saw it and it sucked. 3 people clapped in a decently full theater for 2 seconds until they realized everyone else was dead silent. AMASo, it's the opinion of those who didn't go and watch the movie that's more important. People who've seen it are liking it.
I hope I'm reading this wrong and you're not suggesting a conspiracy to get this trash to fail. As for the last bit, I don't see that happening, do you? Gotta have mostly positive reviews/impressions to get good WOM.Its called social media engineering. If it put Trump in the whitehouse it sure can sink a film.
Still if it gets good word of mouth it might not drop much by next week.
I wasn't trying to say there's this grand DCU conspiracy among reviewers, but rather, that everyone loves a dumpster fire, and so the bad reviews will pile on. JL doesn't deserve a 38%. That's harsh. Granted, there's some flaws, but it's competent, fun, and it's a stop-gap for future DCU movies.
Let's use Ultron as an example because it's similar - a stop-gap for Civil War. Here we don't have any real stakes, the protagonist chooses the most convoluted plan ever to destroy mankind (even though at one point he controlled all our nukes), and Hulk has this weird love interest in Black Widow. Whedon even admits it's a mess. But it gets a 75%?
And I've enjoyed a bunch of MCU movies (Thor 2, Guardians, Civil War), but let's be honest - there were some stinkers too. And JL doesn't even compare to the Marvel's worst? I find that strange.
These are all your opinions.
Why would everyone fall in line with your opinions?
So, it's the opinion of those who didn't go and watch the movie that's more important. People who've seen it are liking it.
Just saw it, I liked BvS, I liked this one way better, could not unsee Clarks cgi mouth. and Supes was well done this time, I really hope thatvthey dont Complete reset DCU and recast Carvill, I think he can do a good Superman if handled by the correct hands.
Wow Paramount comes off like a bunch of assholes in that story.
Your ass isn't a good source friendo.I'm not saying everyone liked it but I'd say 4 out of 5 people liked it.
He is signed for mission impossible, can't take it off for reshoots so they do a last second fix with cg. Worlds fastest documentary.I need an hour long documentary on the mustache, there are so many unanswered questions
That is what they want you to thinkHe is signed for mission impossible, can't take it off for reshoots so they do a last second fix with cg. Worlds fastest documentary.
I dunnoI'm not saying everyone liked it but I'd say 4 out of 5 people liked it.
Are you a real person?I'm not saying everyone liked it but I'd say 4 out of 5 people liked it.
In justice League 2 his fake lip starts to rot so he reveals he is actually bizarro!
Couldn't they just put a fake one on him? It would look 10x more convincing. Why the fuck were they gonna CGI it in the first place?Not sure I agree. Cavill was on "loan" to WB for reshoots when he was supposed to be working on MI6. If anything, Paramount did WB a favour. They don't owe WB anything and may not have had to let him go, depending on how the contracts were worded on both sides.
It would make sense they'd prioritize their movie above all else. Even if the CGI beard could be added back (this is such a hilarious subject) Paramount absolutely knew it could look wonky, and they didn't have to say yes.
Couldn't they just put a fake one on him? It would look 10x more convincing. Why the fuck were they gonna CGI it in the first place?
Really says all thats wrong with modern Hollywood SFX right there.
I dunno
The poor reviews and the very notably apathy with movie going audiences don't really paint a picture of 80% of people seeing it speaking well of it....much less 39% :P